Coinfections are common in nature and include hosts simultaneously or sequentially exposed to different genotypes, which may shape evolutionary outcomes. Here, we investigated the potential for simultaneous and sequential exposures to impact host fitness by exposing Caenorhabditis elegans hosts to different bacterial strains of Serratia marcescens. We found that in simultaneous exposures a highly virulent strain induced high mortality regardless of coexposure. In sequential exposures, single strain virulence was not necessarily indicative of coexposure virulence. Overall, we find simultaneous and sequential infections can generate different mortality rates. Thus, host outcomes may dependend on particular genotype combinations and infection timing.
","acknowledgements":"We would like to acknowledge the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, University of Minnesota for providing worms strains used in these experiments.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Population Biology, Ecology, and Evolutionary Biology Graduate Program"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","dataCuration","methodology","project","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","investigation"],"email":"emily.smith@emory.edu","firstName":"Emily B.","lastName":"Smith","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, US","Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Biology","Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","project","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"jdg6200@psu.edu","firstName":"Jennifer D.","lastName":"Gresham","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Biology"],"credit":["dataCuration","conceptualization","methodology","investigation"],"email":"Andrewhuang33927@gmail.com","firstName":"Andrew","lastName":"Huang","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","fundingAcquisition","project","resources","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"levi.morran@emory.edu","firstName":"Levi T.","lastName":"Morran","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":null,"extendedData":[{"description":"Data Tables","doi":null,"resourceType":"Dataset","name":"Extended Data.docx","url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/0d2d7553673c46078c78d1c1b8e3eeaa.docx"}],"funding":"This work was funded by the National Science Foundation Division of Environmental Biology 1750553.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/7e5d7e38706157b9240b477ab206d5cb.png"},"imageCaption":"Estimated proportion of host mortality after 48 hours of simultaneous and sequential exposures to parasite strains with 95% bootstrap confidence intervals. Color corresponds to host genotype. The left subplot of each set of data shows hosts exposed to one bacterial Serratia strain, while the right subplot of each set of data shows hosts exposed to multiple bacterial Serratia strains.
","imageTitle":"Estimated proportional host mortality under simultaneous and sequential coexposures.
","methods":"Nematode Maintenance and Bacterial Strains
The C. elegans strain used for these experiments were all variants of the Hawaiian strain CB4856. The CF3-30 strain (referred to in Figure 1 as CF3) was created previously (Morran et al. 2009, 2011) from CB4856 C. elegans which contain the fog-2 (q71) mutant allele which prevents spermatogenesis in hermaphrodites (Schedl and Kimble 1988) making them obligately outcrossing. The CF3-30i strain (referred to in Figure 1 as CF3i) was created from backcrossing the wild-type fog-2 (q71) allele back into the CF3-30 background, restoring hermaphrodite spermatogenesis function. These populations were maintained on 100mm Petri dishes filled with Nematode Growth Medium-Lite (NGM-Lite, US Biological, Swampscott, MA, USA) and seeded with 200µl of Escherichia coli OP50 (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, University of Minnesota). Nematodes were allowed to grow, feed, and reproduce on these plates and were stored at 20°C.
The strains of S. marcescens and OP50 used for these experiments were grown in Luria Broth to carrying capacity, shaking overnight at 28°C. These liquid cultures were then used to seed Serratia Selection Plates (SSPs) as described previously (Morran et al. 2011). Strains used for both simultaneous and sequential infections included Sm2170 (Sue Katz, Rogers State University), Sm933 (Carolina Biological Supply), and SmDb11 (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, University of Minnesota). The C. elegans hosts show signs of infection with S. marcescens 24 hours after infection and interactions between Serratia and C. elegans have been previously characterized (Schulenburg and Ewbank 2004).
Exposure Assays
Serratia Selection Plates (SSPs), as described previously (Morran et al. 2011), were used to expose hosts to parasite strains. Briefly, the left third of the plate was seeded with the parasite strain of choice, the right third of the plate was seeded with a E. coli OP50 food, and the middle third was not seeded and contained a strip of Ampicillin to prevent the carry-over of the parasite into the food lawn. The worm hosts were placed on the parasite lawns at the start of the assay and were given 24 hours to interact with the parasite and crawl across the plate to the lawn of food. After the first 24 hours, the surviving worms on the lawn of food were liquid transferred with M9 to another SSP for another 24 hours. The number of worms alive on the lawn of food after the second SSP exposure was counted after a total of 48 hours of potential parasite exposure. Simultaneously infected hosts were exposed to proportionally equal mixtures of bacterial strains and moved to another replicate of the same mixture to control for movement of worms after 24 hours. Sequential exposures were conducted by exposing host populations to a single bacterial strain lawn for 24 hours and then surviving individuals were moved to a secondary bacterial lawn for another 24 hours before survival counts were collected. Simultaneous assays were run in triplicate with 200 worms per replicate population. Sequential assays were conducted with 300 worms per population and five replicates per treatment.
Statistical Analysis
Mortality was analyzed as a continuous proportion using generalized additive models (GAMLSS) implemented in the gamlss package in R (Rigby and Stasinopoulos 2005). Because the mortality data included both exact zeros and ones, we fit a zero- and one- inflated beta distribution (BEINF), which explicitly models the probability of observing structural zeros and ones in addition to variation in intermediate values. Treatment and host genotype were included as fixed effects on the mean parameter (μ), while scale (σ) was modeled as constant, and the zero/one inflation parameter (ν) was allowed to vary with both treatment and genotype to account for potential heterogeneity in the frequency of zeros/ones across experimental conditions. Model adequacy was assessed using randomized quantile residuals and visual inspection of fitted values, which indicated good model convergence and adequate fit. Uncertainty in predicted mortality estimates were quantified using nonparametric bootstrapping of the BEINF model (n = 1,000, resampling with replacement, random set seed for reproducibility). Predicted means and 95% confidence intervals were calculated from the resulting bootstrap distributions. While the model was fitted on the logit scale, all reported values and confidence intervals are back-transformed to the original 0–1 scale for interpretability and consistency with the figures. Pairwise comparisons between all treatments were then conducted post-hoc (Table 4, Table 6). All analyses were conducted in RStudio (RStudio Version 2025.05.1+513).
","reagents":"","patternDescription":"Coinfections, broadly defined as hosts experiencing two or more strain or species infections at once, are common in nature but can vary in their composition, order of exposure, duration of coexistence, and the amount of time between encounters with the initial and secondary infections (Petney and Andrews 1998; Cox 2001; Read and Taylor 2001; Fleming et al. 2006; Balmer and Tanner 2011; Rellstab et al. 2011; Thumbi et al. 2014; Rynkiewicz et al. 2015; Karvonen et al. 2019; Devi et al. 2021). Hosts can experience coinfections that are introduced at the same time (“simultaneous” coinfections), like the transmission of Borellia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum, the causative agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, in the bite of a single tick to a human host (Horowitz et al. 2013) or through trophic movement from a coinfected prey to a predator. Alternatively, hosts can experience coinfections that co-occur for some amount of time but are not introduced at the same time (“sequential” coinfections) such as influenza patients that secondarily experience respiratory system colonization with bacterial species that lead to pneumonia (Pasman 2012) or tomato plants infected with an avirulent strain of powdery mildew that then suppresses a secondary virulent strain (Seifi et al. 2012). The timing as well as the nature of the infecting parasites can have important consequences on host fitness, and ultimately, the evolutionary trajectories of the host and parasite populations (Telfer et al. 2008; Alizon et al. 2013; Karvonen et al. 2019; Zilio and Koella 2020; Schmid-Hempel 2021). Different strains of bacterial parasites might have additive or multiplicative effects on hosts relative to single strain infections when coexposed, but the way in which those effects might occur could encompass a variety of mechanisms.
First, coinfections differ from single infections because they create an environment in which competition between the coinfecting partners may exist. Competition between coinfections have been shown to either increase (Bell et al. 2006; Ben-Ami et al. 2008) or decrease (Gower and Webster 2005) virulence in host populations, emphasizing that the particular ecological context and specific interactions between players in coinfection scenarios may be important for predicting whether within-host competition will drive overall virulence up or down (Schjorring and Koella 2003; West and Buckling 2003; Alizon 2008; Ashby and King 2017; Karvonen et al. 2019). Another way coinfecting species may impact host-parasite dynamics is through immune priming. One coinfecting species or strain may trigger a host response that protects the host from other infections, effectively priming the host immune system to better tolerate other infections (Prigot-Maurice et al. 2022). Immune responses may alternatively be focused on a less virulent infection and could actually allow a more virulent coinfecting species to increase in frequency or select for increased virulence in the less-virulent coinfecting species, or competition among coinfecting strains may be to some degree mediated by the host immune system (Råberg et al. 2006). Coinfecting species or strains may also interact indirectly and potentially facilitate each other’s success. For example, mice infected with H. polygyrus, an intestinal helminth, endure damaged epithelial junctions that then allowed for increased bacterial translocation across the epithelium (Chen et al. 2005). This kind of facilitation could result in higher virulence. Therefore, more research on the impact of coinfections on hosts is needed to better understand how coinfections might interact with each other and with their hosts.
We conducted both simultaneous and sequential exposures of different strains of the bacterial species Serratia marcescens (strains SmDb11, Sm933, and Sm2170) in the model host system, Caenorhabditis elegans. Infection timing can impact how the overall dynamic of coinfection proceeds (Lello et al. 2004; Telfer et al. 2008) and by using this host-parasite system we were able to systematically probe differences in host mortality due to simultaneously or sequentially exposed coinfections. S. marcescens is a gram-negative bacterial parasite that occurs commonly in soil, water, composts, and is naturally encountered by C. elegans in the environment (Alegado et al. 2003; Kurz and Ewbank 2003). C. elegans are initially attracted to S. marcescens and eat the bacteria, after which the bacteria colonize the intestine, causing damage to the intestinal tissue and inducing host mortality (Pradel et al. 2007). We measured host mortality in populations of C.elegans that were subjected to either simultaneous coexposures, sequential coexposures, or single infections.
Single Strain Exposures
Our data show that hosts exposed to Serratia strains SmDb11, Sm933, and Sm2170 exhibit increasing levels of host mortality, respectively. Simultaneous exposures in single strain infections refers to hosts exposed just to one strain. Simultaneous exposures to an E. coli OP50 control resulted in low estimated proportional host mortality relative to other treatments, simultaneous exposures to SmDb11 resulted in higher estimated proportional host mortality, hosts simultaneously exposed to Sm933 had even higher levels of estimated proportional mortality, and hosts simultaneously exposed to Sm2170 had the highest levels of estimated proportional mortality (Figure 1, Table 1). Estimated proportional host mortality in the single strain sequential data follows the same trend with sequential exposure to E.coli OP50 inducing little mortality, sequential exposure to SmDb11 inducing a relatively low level of relative mortality, Sm933 inducing higher relative mortality, and Sm2170 inducing the highest level of relative host mortality (Figure 1, Table 2). This trend aligns with previous work categorizing the relative virulence of these strains in C. elegans (Lewis et al. 2022). In the simultaneous data, host genotype had a significant effect on mortality, with CF3-30 exhibiting significantly higher mortality than CB4856 across treatments (Figure 1, Table 3). There was no significant effect of genotype in the sequential single strain data.
Multi-strain Exposures
Simultaneous exposures including the most virulent strain, Sm2170, led to consistently high levels of relative host mortality regardless of coexposed strain identity (Figure 1, Table 1). However, this Sm2170 precedence was not supported in the sequential exposures (Figure 1, Table 2). While the relative mortality of sequential coexposures including Sm2170 hovered around roughly the same mortality range as Sm2170 in the single strain context, there was more variation in host mortality across these treatments than in the simultaneous context. Host genotype also had an effect on survival across the simultaneous dataset, with CF3-30 exhibiting significantly higher mortality than CB4856 across treatments (Figure 1, Table 3). There was no effect of genotype in the sequential multi-strain data.
There are several possible explanations for why sequential exposures may not follow the same pattern as simultaneous exposures. Strains in simultaneous exposures, while introduced at equal proportions, may end up with an over-representation of the more virulent strain after they have been in direct competition for some amount of time. Alternatively, exposing hosts to a sequence of strains may allow hosts to generate some level of tolerance or mount an immune response as a result of the first exposure before the introduction of a secondary exposure. It may also be the case that a lag in the time of parasite introduction could change the dynamic with which coexisting strains may interact with each other. A 24 hour lead time may also provide an otherwise out-competed strain to have a better chance of establishing and competing with a more virulent strain for longer. Overall, we see no clear additive or multiplicative effects of coexposed strains on host mortality, suggesting that the interactions between infecting strains and hosts are more complex than a simple competitive dominance hierarchy among strains or compounding effect on the host. Rather, we see mixed outcomes in which there are some differences in simultaneous and sequential exposures, but these differences are not consistent across the dataset. Therefore, we cannot conclude that the timing of strain exposure (simultaneously vs sequential) has simple, predicable effects on host mortality outcomes. These results were consistent across host genotypes CF3-30 and CF3-30i, but other host genotypes may vary in their response.
We conclude that the effect of coexposures on estimated proportional host mortality does not have a clear additive or multiplicative effect in the Serratia/C. elegans system, and particular strain interactions may dictate the outcome rather than the order or timing of exposure (simultaneous vs. sequential).
","references":[{"reference":"Alegado RA, Campbell MC, Chen WC, Slutz SS, Tan MW. 2003. Characterization of Mediators of Microbial Virulence and Innate Immunity. Cellular Microbiology. 5: 435-444.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.00287.x"},{"reference":"Alizon S. 2008. Decreased Overall Virulence in Coinfected Hosts Leads to the Persistence. The American Naturalist. 172: E67-E79.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/588077"},{"reference":"Alizon S, De Roode JC, Michalakis Y. 2013. Multiple Infections and the Evolution of Virulence. Ecology Letters. 16: 556-567.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/ele.12076"},{"reference":"Alizon S. 2013. Parasite Co-Transmission and the Evolutionary Epidemiology of Virulence. Evolution. 67: 921-933.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01827.x"},{"reference":"Ashby B, King KC. 2017. Friendly Foes: The Evolution of Host Protection by a Parasite. Evolution Letters. 1: 211-221.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1002/evl3.19"},{"reference":"Balmer O, Tanner M. 2011. Prevalence and Implications of Multiple-Strain Infections. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 11: 868-878.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70241-9"},{"reference":"Bell AS, De Roode JC, Sim D, Read AF. 2006. Within-Host Competition in Genetically Diverse Malaria Infections: Parsite. Evolution. 60: 1358-1371.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01215.x"},{"reference":"Ben Ami F, Mouton L, Ebert D. 2008. The Effects of Multiple Infections on the Expression and Evolution of. Evolution. 62: 1700-1711.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00391.x"},{"reference":"Brown SP, Hochberg ME, Grenfell BT. 2002. Does Multiple Infection Select for Raised Virulence?. Trends in Microbiology. 10: 401-405.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0966-842X(02)02413-7"},{"reference":"Chen CC, Louie S, Mc Cormick B, Walker WA, Shi HN. 2005. Concurrent Infection with an Intestinal Helminth Parasite Impairs Host. Infection and Immunity. 73: 5468-5481.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/iai.73.9.5468-5481.2005"},{"reference":"Cox FEG. 2001. Concomitant Infections, Parasites and Immune Responses. Parasitology. 122: S23-S38.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/S003118200001698X"},{"reference":"Devi P, Khan A, Chattopadhyay P, Mehta P, Sahni S, Sharma S, Pandey R. 2021. Co-Infections as Modulators of Disease Outcome: Minor Players or Major. Frontiers in Microbiology. 12","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2021.664386"},{"reference":"Fleming FM, Brooker S, Geiger SM, Caldas IR, Correa Oliveira R, Hotez PJ, Bethony JM. 2006. Synergistic Associations between Hookworm and Other Helminth Species in a. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 11: 56-64.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01541.x"},{"reference":"Ghosh E, Wallace M, Hufbauer RA. . `Disease-smart' Outcrossing Can Enhance Individual Fitness and Increase. Insect Conservation and Diversity. n/a","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/icad.12842"},{"reference":"Gower CM, Webster JP. 2005. Intraspecific Competition and the Evolution of Virulence in a Parasitic. Evolution. 59: 544-553.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01014.x"},{"reference":"Horowitz HW, Aguero Rosenfeld ME, Holmgren D, Mc Kenna D, Schwartz I, Cox ME, Wormser GP. 2013. Lyme Disease and Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis Coinfection: Impact of. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 56: 93-99.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/cid/cis852"},{"reference":"Karvonen A, Jokela J, Laine AL. 2019. Importance of Sequence and Timing in Parasite Coinfections. Trends in Parasitology. 35: 109-118.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pt.2018.11.007"},{"reference":"Kumar N, Sharma S, Barua S, Tripathi BN, Rouse BT. 2018. Virological and Immunological Outcomes of Coinfections. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 31: e00111-17.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/CMR.00111-17"},{"reference":"Kurz CL, Ewbank JJ. 2000. Caenorhabditis Elegans for the Study of Host--Pathogen Interactions. Trends in Microbiology. 8: 142-144.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01691-1"},{"reference":"Lello J, Boag B, Fenton A, Stevenson IR, Hudson PJ. 2004. Competition and Mutualism among the Gut Helminths of a Mammalian Host. Nature. 428: 840-844.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nature02490"},{"reference":"Levin BR, Bull JJ. 1994. Short-Sighted Evolution and the Virulence of Pathogenic Microorganisms. Trends in Microbiology. 2: 76-81.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0966-842X(94)90538-X"},{"reference":"Lewis JA, Penley MJ, Sylla H, Ahumada SD, Morran LT. 2022. Antagonistic Coevolution Limits the Range of Host Defense in C. Elegans. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 12","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fcimb.2022.758745"},{"reference":"May RM, Nowak MA. 1997. Coinfection and the Evolution of Parasite Virulence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 261: 209-215.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.1995.0138"},{"reference":"Morran LT, Parmenter MD, Phillips PC. 2009. Mutation Load and Rapid Adaptation Favour Outcrossing over. Nature. 462: 350-352.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nature08496"},{"reference":"Morran LT, Schmidt OG, Gelarden IA, Parrish RC, Lively CM. 2011. Running with the Red Queen: Host-parasite Coevolution Selects for. Science (New York, N. y. ). 333: 216-218.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1206360"},{"reference":"O Keeffe FE, Pendleton RC, Holland CV, Luijckx P. 2023. Increased Virulence Due to Multiple Infection in Daphnia Leads to Limited. Parasitology. 151: 58-67.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/S0031182023001130"},{"reference":"O Keeffe KR, Simha A, Mitchell CE. . Indirect Interactions among Co-Infecting Parasites and a Microbial. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 288: 20211313.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2021.1313"},{"reference":"Pasman L. 2012. The Complication of Coinfection. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 85: 127-132.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01465.x"},{"reference":"Petney TN, Andrews RH. 1998. Multiparasite Communities in Animals and Humans: Frequency, Structure and. International Journal for Parasitology. 28: 377-393.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0020-7519(97)00189-6"},{"reference":"Pradel E, Zhang Y, Pujol N, Matsuyama T, Bargmann CI, Ewbank JJ. 2007. Detection and Avoidance of a Natural Product from the Pathogenic Bacterium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of. 104: 2295-2300.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0610281104"},{"reference":"Prigot Maurice C, Beltran Bech S, Braquart Varnier C. 2022. Why and How Do Protective Symbionts Impact Immune Priming with Pathogens. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 126: 104245.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.dci.2021.104245"},{"reference":"Raberg L, De Roode JC, Bell AS, Stamou P, Gray D, Read AF. 2006. The Role of Immune-Mediated Apparent Competition in Genetically Diverse. The American Naturalist. 168: 41-53.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/505160"},{"reference":"Read AF, Taylor LH. 2001. The Ecology of Genetically Diverse Infections. Science (New York, N. Y. ). 292: 1099-1102.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1059410"},{"reference":"Rellstab C, Louhi KR, Karvonen A, Jokela J. 2011. Analysis of Trematode Parasite Communities in Fish Eye Lenses by. Infection, Genetics and Evolution: Journal of Molecular Epidemiology and. 11: 1276-1286.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.meegid.2011.04.018"},{"reference":"Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. 2005. Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape. Applied Statistics. 54: 507-554.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x"},{"reference":"Rovenolt FH, Tate AT. 2022. The Impact of Coinfection Dynamics on Host Competition and Coexistence. The American Naturalist. 199: 91-107.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/717180"},{"reference":"Rynkiewicz EC, Pedersen AB, Fenton A. 2015. An Ecosystem Approach to Understanding and Managing Within-Host Parasite. Trends in Parasitology. 31: 212-221.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pt.2015.02.005"},{"reference":"Schedl T, Kimble J. 1988. Fog-2, a Germ-Line-Specific Sex Determination Gene Required for. Genetics. 119: 43-61.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/genetics/119.1.43"},{"reference":"Schjorring S, Koella JC. 2003. Sub-Lethal Effects of Pathogens Can Lead to the Evolution of Lower. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 270: 189-193.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2002.2233"},{"reference":"Schmid Hempel P. 2021. Evolutionary Parasitology: The Integrated Study of Infections, Immunology,.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Schulenburg H, Ewbank JJ. 2004. Diversity and Specificity in the Interaction between Caenorhabditis. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 4: 49.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/1471-2148-4-49"},{"reference":"Seifi A, Nonomura T, Matsuda Y, Toyoda H, Bai Y. 2012. An Avirulent Tomato Powdery Mildew Isolate Induces Localized Acquired. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. 25: 372-378.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1094/MPMI-06-11-0171"},{"reference":"Slowinski SP, Morran LT, Parrish RC, Cui ER, Bhattacharya A, Lively CM, Phillips PC. 2016. Coevolutionary Interactions with Parasites Constrain the Spread of. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution. 70: 2632-2639.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/evo.13048"},{"reference":"Susi H, Vale PF, Laine AL. 2015. Host Genotype and Coinfection Modify the Relationship of within and. The American Naturalist. 186: 252-263.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/682069"},{"reference":"Telfer S, Birtles R, Bennett M, Lambin X, Paterson S, Begon M. 2008. Parasite Interactions in Natural Populations: Insights from Longitudinal. Parasitology. 135: 767-781.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/S0031182008000395"},{"reference":"Telfer S, Lambin X, Birtles R, Beldomenico P, Burthe S, Paterson S, Begon M. 2010. Species Interactions in a Parasite Community Drive Infection Risk in a. Science. 330: 243-246.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1190333"},{"reference":"Thumbi SM, Bronsvoort BMC, Poole EJ, Kiara H, Toye PG, Mbole Kariuki MN, et al., Woolhouse MEJ. 2014. Parasite Co-Infections and Their Impact on Survival of Indigenous Cattle. PLOS ONE. 9: e76324.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0076324"},{"reference":"West SA, Buckling A. 2003. Cooperation, Virulence and Siderophore Production in Bacterial Parasites. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 270: 37-44.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2002.2209"},{"reference":"Zilio G, Koella JC. 2020. Sequential Co-Infections Drive Parasite Competition and the Outcome of. Journal of Animal Ecology. 89: 2367-2377.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/1365-2656.13302"}],"title":"Simultaneous and Sequential Coexposures of Serratia marcescens in Caenorhabditis elegans
","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Robert Luallen"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"Gary Craig Schindelman"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"e446b0cc-42bb-474c-9f99-da630685d856","decision":"revise","abstract":"Coinfections are common in nature and include hosts simultaneously or sequentially exposed to different genotypes, which may shape evolutionary outcomes. Here, we investigated the potential for simultaneous and sequential exposures to impact host fitness by exposing Caenorhabditis elegans hosts to different bacterial strains of Serratia marcescens. We found that in simultaneous exposures a highly virulent strain induced high mortality regardless of coexposure. In sequential exposures, single strain virulence was not necessarily indicative of coexposure virulence. Overall, we find simultaneous and sequential infections can generate different mortality rates. Thus, host outcomes may depend on particular genotype combinations and infection timing.
","acknowledgements":"We would like to acknowledge the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, University of Minnesota for providing some of the worm strains used in these experiments.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Population Biology, Ecology, and Evolutionary Biology Graduate Program"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","dataCuration","methodology","project","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","investigation"],"email":"emily.smith@emory.edu","firstName":"Emily B.","lastName":"Smith","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, US","Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Biology","Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","project","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"jdg6200@psu.edu","firstName":"Jennifer D.","lastName":"Gresham","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Biology"],"credit":["dataCuration","conceptualization","methodology","investigation"],"email":"Andrewhuang33927@gmail.com","firstName":"Andrew","lastName":"Huang","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","fundingAcquisition","project","resources","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"levi.morran@emory.edu","firstName":"Levi T.","lastName":"Morran","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":null,"extendedData":[{"description":"Statical Analysis Tables for Figure 1 ","doi":null,"resourceType":"Dataset","name":"Extended Data.docx","url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/4b14dc53bc031f49a25af11e6634d4f8.docx"}],"funding":"This work was funded by the National Science Foundation Division of Environmental Biology 1750553.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/9e18c2b59fd67d876b38d8e3cd73db5e.png"},"imageCaption":"Estimated proportion of host mortality after 48 hours of simultaneous and sequential exposures to parasite strains with 95% bootstrap confidence intervals. Color corresponds to host genotype. The left subplot of each set of data shows hosts exposed to one bacterial Serratia strain, while the right subplot of each set of data shows hosts exposed to multiple bacterial Serratia strains.
","imageTitle":"Estimated proportional host mortality under simultaneous and sequential coexposures
","methods":"Nematode Maintenance and Bacterial Strains
The C. elegans strain used for these experiments were all variants of the Hawaiian strain CB4856. The CF3-30 strain (referred to in Figure 1 as CF3) was created previously (Morran et al. 2009, 2011) from CB4856 C. elegans which contain the fog-2 (q71) mutant allele which prevents spermatogenesis in hermaphrodites (Schedl and Kimble 1988) making them obligately outcrossing. The CF3-30i strain (referred to in Figure 1 as CF3i) was created from backcrossing the wild-type fog-2 (q71) allele back into the CF3-30 background, restoring hermaphrodite spermatogenesis function. These populations were maintained on 100mm Petri dishes filled with Nematode Growth Medium-Lite (NGM-Lite, US Biological, Swampscott, MA, USA) and seeded with 200µl of Escherichia coli OP50 (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, University of Minnesota). Nematodes were allowed to grow, feed, and reproduce on these plates and were stored at 20°C.
The strains of S. marcescens and OP50 used for these experiments were grown in Luria Broth to carrying capacity, shaking overnight at 28°C. These liquid cultures were then used to seed Serratia Selection Plates (SSPs) as described previously (Morran et al. 2011). Strains used for both simultaneous and sequential infections included Sm2170 (Sue Katz, Rogers State University), Sm933 (Carolina Biological Supply), and SmDb11 (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, University of Minnesota). The C. elegans hosts show signs of infection with S. marcescens 24 hours after infection and interactions between Serratia and C. elegans have been previously characterized (Schulenburg and Ewbank 2004).
Exposure Assays
Serratia Selection Plates (SSPs), as described previously (Morran et al. 2011), were used to expose hosts to parasite strains. Briefly, the left third of the plate was seeded with the parasite strain of choice, the right third of the plate was seeded with a E. coli OP50 food, and the middle third was not seeded and contained a strip of Ampicillin to prevent the carry-over of the parasite into the food lawn. The worm hosts were placed on the parasite lawns at the start of the assay and were given 24 hours to interact with the parasite and crawl across the plate to the lawn of food. After the first 24 hours, the surviving worms on the lawn of food were liquid transferred with M9 to another SSP for another 24 hours. The number of worms alive on the lawn of food after the second SSP exposure was counted after a total of 48 hours of potential parasite exposure. Simultaneously infected hosts were exposed to proportionally equal mixtures of bacterial strains and moved to another replicate of the same mixture to control for movement of worms after 24 hours. Sequential exposures were conducted by exposing host populations to a single bacterial strain lawn for 24 hours and then surviving individuals were moved to a secondary bacterial lawn for another 24 hours before survival counts were collected. Simultaneous assays were run in triplicate with 200 worms per replicate population. Sequential assays were conducted with 300 worms per population and five replicates per treatment.
Statistical Analysis
Mortality was analyzed as a continuous proportion using generalized additive models (GAMLSS) implemented in the gamlss package in R (Rigby and Stasinopoulos 2005). Because the mortality data included both exact zeros and ones, we fit a zero- and one- inflated beta distribution (BEINF), which explicitly models the probability of observing structural zeros and ones in addition to variation in intermediate values. Treatment and host genotype were included as fixed effects on the mean parameter (μ), while scale (σ) was modeled as constant, and the zero/one inflation parameter (ν) was allowed to vary with both treatment and genotype to account for potential heterogeneity in the frequency of zeros/ones across experimental conditions. Model adequacy was assessed using randomized quantile residuals and visual inspection of fitted values, which indicated good model convergence and adequate fit. Uncertainty in predicted mortality estimates were quantified using nonparametric bootstrapping of the BEINF model (n = 1,000, resampling with replacement, random set seed for reproducibility). Predicted means and 95% confidence intervals were calculated from the resulting bootstrap distributions. While the model was fitted on the logit scale, all reported values and confidence intervals are back-transformed to the original 0–1 scale for interpretability and consistency with the figures. Pairwise comparisons between all treatments were then conducted post-hoc (Extended Data Table 4, Extended Data Table 6). All analyses were conducted in RStudio (RStudio Version 2025.05.1+513).
","reagents":"","patternDescription":"Coinfections, broadly defined as hosts experiencing two or more strain or species infections at once, are common in nature but can vary in their composition, order of exposure, duration of coexistence, and the amount of time between encounters with the initial and secondary infections (Petney and Andrews 1998; Cox 2001; Read and Taylor 2001; Fleming et al. 2006; Balmer and Tanner 2011; Rellstab et al. 2011; Thumbi et al. 2014; Rynkiewicz et al. 2015; Karvonen et al. 2019; Devi et al. 2021). Hosts can experience coinfections that are introduced at the same time (“simultaneous” coinfections), like the transmission of Borellia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum, the causative agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, in the bite of a single tick to a human host (Horowitz et al. 2013) or through trophic movement from a coinfected prey to a predator. Alternatively, hosts can experience coinfections that co-occur for some amount of time but are not introduced at the same time (“sequential” coinfections) such as influenza patients that secondarily experience respiratory system colonization with bacterial species that lead to pneumonia (Pasman 2012) or tomato plants infected with an avirulent strain of powdery mildew that then suppresses a secondary virulent strain (Seifi et al. 2012). The timing as well as the nature of the infecting parasites can have important consequences on host fitness, and ultimately, the evolutionary trajectories of the host and parasite populations (Telfer et al. 2008; Alizon et al. 2013; Karvonen et al. 2019; Zilio and Koella 2020; Schmid-Hempel 2021). Different strains of bacterial parasites might have additive or multiplicative effects on hosts relative to single strain infections when coexposed, but the way in which those effects might occur could encompass a variety of mechanisms.
First, coinfections differ from single infections because they create an environment in which competition between the coinfecting partners may exist. Competition between coinfections have been shown to either increase (Bell et al. 2006; Ben-Ami et al. 2008) or decrease (Gower and Webster 2005) virulence in host populations, emphasizing that the particular ecological context and specific interactions between players in coinfection scenarios may be important for predicting whether within-host competition will drive overall virulence up or down (Schjorring and Koella 2003; West and Buckling 2003; Alizon 2008; Ashby and King 2017; Karvonen et al. 2019). Another way coinfecting species may impact host-parasite dynamics is through immune priming. One coinfecting species or strain may trigger a host response that protects the host from other infections, effectively priming the host immune system to better tolerate other infections (Prigot-Maurice et al. 2022). Immune responses may alternatively be focused on a less virulent infection and could actually allow a more virulent coinfecting species to increase in frequency or select for increased virulence in the less-virulent coinfecting species, or competition among coinfecting strains may be to some degree mediated by the host immune system (Råberg et al. 2006). Coinfecting species or strains may also interact indirectly and potentially facilitate each other’s success. For example, mice infected with H. polygyrus, an intestinal helminth, endure damaged epithelial junctions that then allowed for increased bacterial translocation across the epithelium (Chen et al. 2005). This kind of facilitation could result in higher virulence. Therefore, more research on the impact of coinfections on hosts is needed to better understand how coinfections might interact with each other and with their hosts.
We conducted both simultaneous and sequential exposures of different strains of the bacterial species Serratia marcescens (strains SmDb11, Sm933, and Sm2170) in the model host system, Caenorhabditis elegans. Infection timing can impact how the overall dynamic of coinfection proceeds (Lello et al. 2004; Telfer et al. 2008) and by using this host-parasite system we were able to systematically probe differences in host mortality due to simultaneously or sequentially exposed coinfections. S. marcescens is a gram-negative bacterial parasite that occurs commonly in soil, water, composts, and is naturally encountered by C. elegans in the environment (Alegado et al. 2003; Kurz and Ewbank 2003). C. elegans are initially attracted to S. marcescens and eat the bacteria, after which the bacteria colonize the intestine, causing damage to the intestinal tissue and inducing host mortality (Pradel et al. 2007). We measured host mortality in populations of C.elegans that were subjected to either simultaneous coexposures, sequential coexposures, or single infections.
Host strains used in these experiments include the Hawaiian strain CB4856, and two additional strains derived from this progenitor. Strain CF3-30 (CF3), which is an obligately outcrossing mutant of CB4856 that has been previously exposed to EMS mutagenesis, and CF3-30i (CF3i), which has the wild-type allele allowing for self-fertilization backcrossed back into the CF3 background. Because CB4856 exhibited reduced mortality rates in the simultaneous experiments and sequential infections were anticipated to be less virulent, we used CF3i in the sequential experiments as a better indicator of infection dynamics than CB4856.
Single Strain Exposures
Our data show that hosts exposed to Serratia strains SmDb11, Sm933, and Sm2170 exhibit increasing levels of host mortality, respectively. Simultaneous exposures in single strain infections refers to hosts exposed just to one strain. Simultaneous exposures to an E. coli OP50 control resulted in low estimated proportional host mortality relative to other treatments, simultaneous exposures to SmDb11 resulted in higher estimated proportional host mortality, hosts simultaneously exposed to Sm933 had even higher levels of estimated proportional mortality, and hosts simultaneously exposed to Sm2170 had the highest levels of estimated proportional mortality (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 1). Estimated proportional host mortality in the single strain sequential data follows the same trend with sequential exposure to E.coli OP50 inducing little mortality, sequential exposure to SmDb11 inducing a relatively low level of relative mortality, Sm933 inducing higher relative mortality, and Sm2170 inducing the highest level of relative host mortality (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 2). This trend aligns with previous work categorizing the relative virulence of these strains in C. elegans (Lewis et al. 2022). In the simultaneous data, host genotype had a significant effect on mortality, with CF3-30 exhibiting significantly higher mortality than CB4856 across treatments (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 3). There was no significant effect of genotype in the sequential single strain data.
Multi-strain Exposures
Simultaneous exposures including the most virulent strain, Sm2170, led to consistently high levels of relative host mortality regardless of coexposed strain identity (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 1). However, this Sm2170 precedence was not supported in the sequential exposures (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 2). While the relative mortality of sequential coexposures including Sm2170 hovered around roughly the same mortality range as Sm2170 in the single strain context, there was more variation in host mortality across these treatments than in the simultaneous context. Host genotype also had an effect on survival across the simultaneous dataset, with CF3-30 exhibiting significantly higher mortality than CB4856 across treatments (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 3). There was no effect of genotype in the sequential multi-strain data.
There are several possible explanations for why sequential exposures may not follow the same pattern as simultaneous exposures. Strains in simultaneous exposures, while introduced at equal proportions, may end up with an over-representation of the more virulent strain after they have been in direct competition for some amount of time. Alternatively, exposing hosts to a sequence of strains may allow hosts to generate some level of tolerance or mount an immune response as a result of the first exposure before the introduction of a secondary exposure. It may also be the case that a lag in the time of parasite introduction could change the dynamic with which coexisting strains may interact with each other. A 24 hour lead time may also provide an otherwise out-competed strain to have a better chance of establishing and competing with a more virulent strain for longer. Overall, we see no clear additive or multiplicative effects of coexposed strains on host mortality, suggesting that the interactions between infecting strains and hosts are more complex than a simple competitive dominance hierarchy among strains or compounding effect on the host. Rather, we see mixed outcomes in which there are some differences in simultaneous and sequential exposures, but these differences are not consistent across the dataset. Therefore, we cannot conclude that the timing of strain exposure (simultaneously vs sequential) has simple, predicable effects on host mortality outcomes. These results were consistent across host genotypes CF3-30 and CF3-30i, but other host genotypes may vary in their response.
We conclude that the effect of coexposures on estimated proportional host mortality does not have a clear additive or multiplicative effect in the Serratia/C. elegans system, and particular strain interactions may dictate the outcome rather than the order or timing of exposure (simultaneous vs. sequential).
","references":[{"reference":"Alegado RA, Campbell MC, Chen WC, Slutz SS, Tan MW. 2003. Characterization of Mediators of Microbial Virulence and Innate Immunity. Cellular Microbiology. 5: 435-444.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.00287.x"},{"reference":"Alizon S. 2008. Decreased Overall Virulence in Coinfected Hosts Leads to the Persistence. The American Naturalist. 172: E67-E79.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/588077"},{"reference":"Alizon S, De Roode JC, Michalakis Y. 2013. Multiple Infections and the Evolution of Virulence. Ecology Letters. 16: 556-567.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/ele.12076"},{"reference":"Alizon S. 2013. Parasite Co-Transmission and the Evolutionary Epidemiology of Virulence. Evolution. 67: 921-933.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01827.x"},{"reference":"Ashby B, King KC. 2017. Friendly Foes: The Evolution of Host Protection by a Parasite. Evolution Letters. 1: 211-221.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1002/evl3.19"},{"reference":"Balmer O, Tanner M. 2011. Prevalence and Implications of Multiple-Strain Infections. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 11: 868-878.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70241-9"},{"reference":"Bell AS, De Roode JC, Sim D, Read AF. 2006. Within-Host Competition in Genetically Diverse Malaria Infections: Parsite. Evolution. 60: 1358-1371.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01215.x"},{"reference":"Ben Ami F, Mouton L, Ebert D. 2008. The Effects of Multiple Infections on the Expression and Evolution of. Evolution. 62: 1700-1711.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00391.x"},{"reference":"Brown SP, Hochberg ME, Grenfell BT. 2002. Does Multiple Infection Select for Raised Virulence?. Trends in Microbiology. 10: 401-405.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0966-842X(02)02413-7"},{"reference":"Chen CC, Louie S, Mc Cormick B, Walker WA, Shi HN. 2005. Concurrent Infection with an Intestinal Helminth Parasite Impairs Host. Infection and Immunity. 73: 5468-5481.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/iai.73.9.5468-5481.2005"},{"reference":"Cox FEG. 2001. Concomitant Infections, Parasites and Immune Responses. Parasitology. 122: S23-S38.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/S003118200001698X"},{"reference":"Devi P, Khan A, Chattopadhyay P, Mehta P, Sahni S, Sharma S, Pandey R. 2021. Co-Infections as Modulators of Disease Outcome: Minor Players or Major. Frontiers in Microbiology. 12","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2021.664386"},{"reference":"Fleming FM, Brooker S, Geiger SM, Caldas IR, Correa Oliveira R, Hotez PJ, Bethony JM. 2006. Synergistic Associations between Hookworm and Other Helminth Species in a. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 11: 56-64.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01541.x"},{"reference":"Ghosh E, Wallace M, Hufbauer RA. . `Disease-smart' Outcrossing Can Enhance Individual Fitness and Increase. Insect Conservation and Diversity. n/a","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/icad.12842"},{"reference":"Gower CM, Webster JP. 2005. Intraspecific Competition and the Evolution of Virulence in a Parasitic. Evolution. 59: 544-553.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01014.x"},{"reference":"Horowitz HW, Aguero Rosenfeld ME, Holmgren D, Mc Kenna D, Schwartz I, Cox ME, Wormser GP. 2013. Lyme Disease and Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis Coinfection: Impact of. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 56: 93-99.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/cid/cis852"},{"reference":"Karvonen A, Jokela J, Laine AL. 2019. Importance of Sequence and Timing in Parasite Coinfections. Trends in Parasitology. 35: 109-118.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pt.2018.11.007"},{"reference":"Kumar N, Sharma S, Barua S, Tripathi BN, Rouse BT. 2018. Virological and Immunological Outcomes of Coinfections. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 31: e00111-17.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/CMR.00111-17"},{"reference":"Kurz CL, Ewbank JJ. 2000. Caenorhabditis Elegans for the Study of Host--Pathogen Interactions. Trends in Microbiology. 8: 142-144.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01691-1"},{"reference":"Lello J, Boag B, Fenton A, Stevenson IR, Hudson PJ. 2004. Competition and Mutualism among the Gut Helminths of a Mammalian Host. Nature. 428: 840-844.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nature02490"},{"reference":"Levin BR, Bull JJ. 1994. Short-Sighted Evolution and the Virulence of Pathogenic Microorganisms. Trends in Microbiology. 2: 76-81.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0966-842X(94)90538-X"},{"reference":"Lewis JA, Penley MJ, Sylla H, Ahumada SD, Morran LT. 2022. Antagonistic Coevolution Limits the Range of Host Defense in C. Elegans. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 12","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fcimb.2022.758745"},{"reference":"May RM, Nowak MA. 1997. Coinfection and the Evolution of Parasite Virulence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 261: 209-215.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.1995.0138"},{"reference":"Morran LT, Parmenter MD, Phillips PC. 2009. Mutation Load and Rapid Adaptation Favour Outcrossing over. Nature. 462: 350-352.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nature08496"},{"reference":"Morran LT, Schmidt OG, Gelarden IA, Parrish RC, Lively CM. 2011. Running with the Red Queen: Host-parasite Coevolution Selects for. Science (New York, N. y. ). 333: 216-218.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1206360"},{"reference":"O Keeffe FE, Pendleton RC, Holland CV, Luijckx P. 2023. Increased Virulence Due to Multiple Infection in Daphnia Leads to Limited. Parasitology. 151: 58-67.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/S0031182023001130"},{"reference":"O Keeffe KR, Simha A, Mitchell CE. . Indirect Interactions among Co-Infecting Parasites and a Microbial. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 288: 20211313.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2021.1313"},{"reference":"Pasman L. 2012. The Complication of Coinfection. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 85: 127-132.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01465.x"},{"reference":"Petney TN, Andrews RH. 1998. Multiparasite Communities in Animals and Humans: Frequency, Structure and. International Journal for Parasitology. 28: 377-393.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0020-7519(97)00189-6"},{"reference":"Pradel E, Zhang Y, Pujol N, Matsuyama T, Bargmann CI, Ewbank JJ. 2007. Detection and Avoidance of a Natural Product from the Pathogenic Bacterium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of. 104: 2295-2300.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0610281104"},{"reference":"Prigot Maurice C, Beltran Bech S, Braquart Varnier C. 2022. Why and How Do Protective Symbionts Impact Immune Priming with Pathogens. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 126: 104245.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.dci.2021.104245"},{"reference":"Raberg L, De Roode JC, Bell AS, Stamou P, Gray D, Read AF. 2006. The Role of Immune-Mediated Apparent Competition in Genetically Diverse. The American Naturalist. 168: 41-53.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/505160"},{"reference":"Read AF, Taylor LH. 2001. The Ecology of Genetically Diverse Infections. Science (New York, N. Y. ). 292: 1099-1102.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1059410"},{"reference":"Rellstab C, Louhi KR, Karvonen A, Jokela J. 2011. Analysis of Trematode Parasite Communities in Fish Eye Lenses by. Infection, Genetics and Evolution: Journal of Molecular Epidemiology and. 11: 1276-1286.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.meegid.2011.04.018"},{"reference":"Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. 2005. Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape. Applied Statistics. 54: 507-554.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x"},{"reference":"Rovenolt FH, Tate AT. 2022. The Impact of Coinfection Dynamics on Host Competition and Coexistence. The American Naturalist. 199: 91-107.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/717180"},{"reference":"Rynkiewicz EC, Pedersen AB, Fenton A. 2015. An Ecosystem Approach to Understanding and Managing Within-Host Parasite. Trends in Parasitology. 31: 212-221.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pt.2015.02.005"},{"reference":"Schedl T, Kimble J. 1988. Fog-2, a Germ-Line-Specific Sex Determination Gene Required for. Genetics. 119: 43-61.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/genetics/119.1.43"},{"reference":"Schjorring S, Koella JC. 2003. Sub-Lethal Effects of Pathogens Can Lead to the Evolution of Lower. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 270: 189-193.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2002.2233"},{"reference":"Schmid Hempel P. 2021. Evolutionary Parasitology: The Integrated Study of Infections, Immunology,.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Schulenburg H, Ewbank JJ. 2004. Diversity and Specificity in the Interaction between Caenorhabditis. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 4: 49.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/1471-2148-4-49"},{"reference":"Seifi A, Nonomura T, Matsuda Y, Toyoda H, Bai Y. 2012. An Avirulent Tomato Powdery Mildew Isolate Induces Localized Acquired. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. 25: 372-378.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1094/MPMI-06-11-0171"},{"reference":"Slowinski SP, Morran LT, Parrish RC, Cui ER, Bhattacharya A, Lively CM, Phillips PC. 2016. Coevolutionary Interactions with Parasites Constrain the Spread of. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution. 70: 2632-2639.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/evo.13048"},{"reference":"Susi H, Vale PF, Laine AL. 2015. Host Genotype and Coinfection Modify the Relationship of within and. The American Naturalist. 186: 252-263.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/682069"},{"reference":"Telfer S, Birtles R, Bennett M, Lambin X, Paterson S, Begon M. 2008. Parasite Interactions in Natural Populations: Insights from Longitudinal. Parasitology. 135: 767-781.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/S0031182008000395"},{"reference":"Telfer S, Lambin X, Birtles R, Beldomenico P, Burthe S, Paterson S, Begon M. 2010. Species Interactions in a Parasite Community Drive Infection Risk in a. Science. 330: 243-246.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1190333"},{"reference":"Thumbi SM, Bronsvoort BMC, Poole EJ, Kiara H, Toye PG, Mbole Kariuki MN, et al., Woolhouse MEJ. 2014. Parasite Co-Infections and Their Impact on Survival of Indigenous Cattle. PLOS ONE. 9: e76324.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0076324"},{"reference":"West SA, Buckling A. 2003. Cooperation, Virulence and Siderophore Production in Bacterial Parasites. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 270: 37-44.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2002.2209"},{"reference":"Zilio G, Koella JC. 2020. Sequential Co-Infections Drive Parasite Competition and the Outcome of. Journal of Animal Ecology. 89: 2367-2377.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/1365-2656.13302"}],"title":"Simultaneous and Sequential Coexposures of Serratia marcescens in Caenorhabditis elegans
","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Robert Luallen"},"openAcknowledgement":true,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"Gary Craig Schindelman"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"5443b6ba-4d7e-4986-9433-08eefc95e9cd","decision":"accept","abstract":"Coinfections are common in nature and include hosts simultaneously or sequentially exposed to different genotypes. We investigated the potential for simultaneous and sequential exposures to impact host fitness by exposing Caenorhabditis elegans hosts to different bacterial strains of Serratia marcescens. We found that in simultaneous exposures a highly virulent strain induced high mortality regardless of coexposure. In sequential exposures, the same highly virulent strain induced high mortality if it was the first strain introduced in a coexposure. Overall, we find host outcomes after coinfections may depend on particular parasite genotype combinations and infection timing.
","acknowledgements":"We would like to acknowledge the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, University of Minnesota for providing some of the worm strains used in these experiments.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Population Biology, Ecology, and Evolutionary Biology Graduate Program"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","dataCuration","methodology","project","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","investigation"],"email":"emily.smith@emory.edu","firstName":"Emily B.","lastName":"Smith","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, US","Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Biology","Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","project","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"jdg6200@psu.edu","firstName":"Jennifer D.","lastName":"Gresham","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Biology"],"credit":["dataCuration","conceptualization","methodology","investigation"],"email":"Andrewhuang33927@gmail.com","firstName":"Andrew","lastName":"Huang","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","fundingAcquisition","project","resources","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"levi.morran@emory.edu","firstName":"Levi T.","lastName":"Morran","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[{"description":"","doi":null,"resourceType":"Dataset","name":"Extended_Data_Corrected.docx","url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/9e8629c8f6d7e758bce0593dfafb1449.docx"}],"funding":"This work was funded by the National Science Foundation Division of Environmental Biology 1750553.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/3dde3ff1c6ce63d1a2043f6a754aa3c4.png"},"imageCaption":"Estimated proportion of host mortality after 48 hours of simultaneous and sequential exposures to parasite strains with 95% bootstrap confidence intervals. Color corresponds to host genotype. The left subplot of each set of data shows hosts exposed to one bacterial Serratia strain, while the right subplot of each set of data shows hosts exposed to multiple bacterial Serratia strains.
","imageTitle":"Estimated proportional host mortality under simultaneous and sequential coexposures
","methods":"Nematode Maintenance and Bacterial Strains
The C. elegans strain used for these experiments were all variants of the Hawaiian strain CB4856. The CF3-30 strain (referred to in Figure 1 as CF3) was created previously (Morran et al. 2009, 2011) from CB4856 C. elegans which contain the fog-2 (q71) mutant allele which prevents spermatogenesis in hermaphrodites (Schedl and Kimble 1988) making them obligately outcrossing. The CF3-30i strain (referred to in Figure 1 as CF3i) was created from backcrossing the wild-type fog-2 (q71) allele back into the CF3-30 background, restoring hermaphrodite spermatogenesis function. These populations were maintained on 100mm Petri dishes filled with Nematode Growth Medium-Lite (NGM-Lite, US Biological, Swampscott, MA, USA) and seeded with 200µl of Escherichia coli OP50 (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, University of Minnesota). Nematodes were allowed to grow, feed, and reproduce on these plates and were stored at 20°C.
The strains of S. marcescens and OP50 used for these experiments were grown in Luria Broth to carrying capacity, shaking overnight at 28°C. These liquid cultures were then used to seed Serratia Selection Plates (SSPs) as described previously (Morran et al. 2011). Strains used for both simultaneous and sequential infections included Sm2170 (Sue Katz, Rogers State University), Sm933 (Carolina Biological Supply), and SmDb11 (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, University of Minnesota). The C. elegans hosts show signs of infection with S. marcescens 24 hours after infection and interactions between Serratia and C. elegans have been previously characterized (Schulenburg and Ewbank 2004).
Exposure Assays
Serratia Selection Plates (SSPs), as described previously (Morran et al. 2011), were used to expose hosts to parasite strains. Briefly, the left third of the plate was seeded with the parasite strain of choice, the right third of the plate was seeded with a E. coli OP50 food, and the middle third was not seeded and contained a strip of Ampicillin to prevent the carry-over of the parasite into the food lawn. The worm hosts were placed on the parasite lawns at the start of the assay and were given 24 hours to interact with the parasite and crawl across the plate to the lawn of food. After the first 24 hours, the surviving worms on the lawn of food were liquid transferred with M9 to another SSP for another 24 hours. The number of worms alive on the lawn of food after the second SSP exposure was counted after a total of 48 hours of potential parasite exposure. Simultaneously infected hosts were exposed to proportionally equal mixtures of bacterial strains and moved to another replicate of the same mixture to control for movement of worms after 24 hours. Sequential exposures were conducted by exposing host populations to a single bacterial strain lawn for 24 hours and then surviving individuals were moved to a secondary bacterial lawn for another 24 hours before survival counts were collected. Simultaneous assays were run in triplicate with 200 worms per replicate population. Sequential assays were conducted with 300 worms per population and five replicates per treatment.
Statistical Analysis
Mortality was analyzed as a continuous proportion using generalized additive models (GAMLSS) implemented in the gamlss package in R (Rigby and Stasinopoulos 2005). Because the mortality data included both exact zeros and ones, we fit a zero- and one- inflated beta distribution (BEINF), which explicitly models the probability of observing structural zeros and ones in addition to variation in intermediate values. Treatment and host genotype were included as fixed effects on the mean parameter (μ), while scale (σ) was modeled as constant, and the zero/one inflation parameter (ν) was allowed to vary with both treatment and genotype to account for potential heterogeneity in the frequency of zeros/ones across experimental conditions. Model adequacy was assessed using randomized quantile residuals and visual inspection of fitted values, which indicated good model convergence and adequate fit. Uncertainty in predicted mortality estimates were quantified using nonparametric bootstrapping of the BEINF model (n = 1,000, resampling with replacement, random set seed for reproducibility). Predicted means and 95% confidence intervals were calculated from the resulting bootstrap distributions. While the model was fitted on the logit scale, all reported values and confidence intervals are back-transformed to the original 0–1 scale for interpretability and consistency with the figures. Pairwise comparisons between all treatments were then conducted post-hoc (Extended Data Table 4, Extended Data Table 6). All analyses were conducted in RStudio (RStudio Version 2025.05.1+513).
","reagents":"","patternDescription":"Coinfections, broadly defined as hosts experiencing two or more strain or species infections at once, are common in nature but can vary in their composition, order of exposure, duration of coexistence, and the amount of time between encounters with the initial and secondary infections (Petney and Andrews 1998; Cox 2001; Read and Taylor 2001; Fleming et al. 2006; Balmer and Tanner 2011; Rellstab et al. 2011; Thumbi et al. 2014; Rynkiewicz et al. 2015; Karvonen et al. 2019; Devi et al. 2021). Hosts can experience coinfections that are introduced at the same time (“simultaneous” coinfections), like the transmission of Borellia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum, the causative agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, in the bite of a single tick to a human host (Horowitz et al. 2013) or through trophic movement from a coinfected prey to a predator. Alternatively, hosts can experience coinfections that co-occur for some amount of time but are not introduced at the same time (“sequential” coinfections) such as influenza patients that secondarily experience respiratory system colonization with bacterial species that lead to pneumonia (Pasman 2012) or tomato plants infected with an avirulent strain of powdery mildew that then suppresses a secondary virulent strain (Seifi et al. 2012). The timing as well as the nature of the infecting parasites can have important consequences on host fitness, and ultimately, the evolutionary trajectories of the host and parasite populations (Telfer et al. 2008; Alizon et al. 2013; Karvonen et al. 2019; Zilio and Koella 2020; Schmid-Hempel 2021). Different strains of bacterial parasites might have additive or multiplicative effects on hosts relative to single strain infections when coexposed, but the way in which those effects might occur could encompass a variety of mechanisms.
First, coinfections differ from single infections because they create an environment in which competition between the coinfecting partners may exist. Competition between coinfections have been shown to either increase (Bell et al. 2006; Ben-Ami et al. 2008) or decrease (Gower and Webster 2005) virulence in host populations, emphasizing that the particular ecological context and specific interactions between players in coinfection scenarios may be important for predicting whether within-host competition will drive overall virulence up or down (Schjorring and Koella 2003; West and Buckling 2003; Alizon 2008; Ashby and King 2017; Karvonen et al. 2019). Another way coinfecting species may impact host-parasite dynamics is through immune priming. One coinfecting species or strain may trigger a host response that protects the host from other infections, effectively priming the host immune system to better tolerate other infections (Prigot-Maurice et al. 2022). Immune responses may alternatively be focused on a less virulent infection and could actually allow a more virulent coinfecting species to increase in frequency or select for increased virulence in the less-virulent coinfecting species, or competition among coinfecting strains may be to some degree mediated by the host immune system (Råberg et al. 2006). Coinfecting species or strains may also interact indirectly and potentially facilitate each other's success. For example, mice infected with H. polygyrus, an intestinal helminth, endure damaged epithelial junctions that then allowed for increased bacterial translocation across the epithelium (Chen et al. 2005). This kind of facilitation could result in higher virulence. Therefore, more research on the impact of coinfections on hosts is needed to better understand how coinfections might interact with each other and with their hosts.
We conducted both simultaneous and sequential exposures of different strains of the bacterial species Serratia marcescens (strains SmDb11, Sm933, and Sm2170) in the model host system, Caenorhabditis elegans. Infection timing can impact how the overall dynamic of coinfection proceeds (Lello et al. 2004; Telfer et al. 2008) and by using this host-parasite system we were able to systematically probe differences in host mortality due to simultaneously or sequentially exposed coinfections. S. marcescens is a gram-negative bacterial parasite that occurs commonly in soil, water, composts, and is naturally encountered by C. elegans in the environment (Alegado et al. 2003; Kurz and Ewbank 2003). C. elegans are initially attracted to S. marcescens and eat the bacteria, after which the bacteria colonize the intestine, causing damage to the intestinal tissue and inducing host mortality (Pradel et al. 2007). We measured host mortality in populations of C.elegans that were subjected to either simultaneous coexposures, sequential coexposures, or single infections.
Host strains used in these experiments include the Hawaiian strain CB4856, and two additional strains derived from this progenitor. Strain CF3-30 (CF3), which is an obligately outcrossing mutant of CB4856 that has been previously exposed to EMS mutagenesis, and CF3-30i (CF3i), which has the wild-type allele allowing for self-fertilization backcrossed back into the CF3 background. Because CB4856 exhibited reduced mortality rates in the simultaneous experiments and sequential infections were anticipated to be less virulent, we used CF3i in the sequential experiments as a better indicator of infection dynamics than CB4856.
Single Strain Exposures
Our data show that hosts exposed to Serratia strains SmDb11, Sm933, and Sm2170 exhibit increasing levels of host mortality, respectively. Simultaneous exposures in single strain infections refers to hosts exposed just to one strain. Simultaneous exposures to an E. coli OP50 control resulted in low estimated proportional host mortality relative to other treatments, simultaneous exposures to SmDb11 resulted in higher estimated proportional host mortality, hosts simultaneously exposed to Sm933 had even higher levels of estimated proportional mortality, and hosts simultaneously exposed to Sm2170 had the highest levels of estimated proportional mortality (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 1). Estimated proportional host mortality in the single strain sequential data follows the same trend with sequential exposure to E.coli OP50 inducing little mortality, sequential exposure to SmDb11 inducing a relatively low level of relative mortality, Sm933 inducing higher relative mortality, and Sm2170 inducing the highest level of relative host mortality (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 2). This trend aligns with previous work categorizing the relative virulence of these strains in C. elegans (Lewis et al. 2022). In the simultaneous data, host genotype had a significant effect on mortality, with CF3-30 exhibiting significantly higher mortality than CB4856 across treatments (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 3). There was no significant effect of genotype in the sequential single strain data.
Multi-strain Exposures
Simultaneous exposures including the most virulent strain, Sm2170, led to consistently high levels of relative host mortality regardless of coexposed strain identity (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 1). This Sm2170 precedence was supported in the sequential exposures when Sm2170 was the first of the coexposed strains in the sequence (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 2). The relative mortality of sequential coexposures that introduced Sm2170 first hovered around roughly the same mortality range as Sm2170 in the single strain context, whereas coexposures in which Sm2170 was the secondary exposure had lower mortality (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 2). Coexposures of SmDb11 and Sm933 generated host mortality rates that were not statistically different than either single strain (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 4).
There are several possible explanations for why sequential exposures follow the same pattern as simultaneous exposures when Sm2170 is first in the sequence of exposures, but not the second. Strains in simultaneous exposures, while introduced at equal proportions, may end up with an over-representation of the more virulent strain after they have been in direct competition for some amount of time. Alternatively, exposing hosts to a sequence of strains may allow hosts to generate some level of tolerance or mount an immune response as a result of the first exposure before the introduction of a secondary exposure. It may also be the case that a lag in the time of parasite introduction could change the dynamic with which coexisting strains may interact with each other. A 24 hour lead time may also provide an otherwise out-competed strain to have a better chance of establishing and competing with a more virulent strain for longer. Further, the introduction of a highly virulent strain for 24 hours may provide an opportunity for that strain to dominate the gut environment before a second strain is introduced. This may explain why sequential coexposures in which hosts saw Sm2170 first had higher mortalities that were very similar to hosts exposed to single infections of Sm2170. Overall, we see no clear additive or multiplicative effects of coexposed strains on host mortality. Instead, our data, at least in the case of the most virulent bacterial strain, are consistent with simple competitive dominance hierarchy among strains that may determine the virulence of the interaction with the host. It's plausible that bacterial virulence may be directly associated with competitive ability or growth rate inside the host, thus allowing Sm2170 to be the dominant strain. Nonetheless, it appears that priority effects, or exposure order, also play a role in determining the outcome of these coexposures. These results were consistent across host genotypes CF3-30 and CF3-30i, but other host genotypes may vary in their response.
Overall, we conclude that the effect of coexposures on estimated proportional host mortality does not have a clear additive or multiplicative effect in the Serratia/C. elegans system, but priority effects, or exposure order, may influence virulence outcomes. Therefore, particular strain interactions in addition to timing of exposure may be important for determining the outcome of coexposures.
","references":[{"reference":"Alegado RA, Campbell MC, Chen WC, Slutz SS, Tan MW. 2003. Characterization of Mediators of Microbial Virulence and Innate Immunity. Cellular Microbiology. 5: 435-444.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.00287.x"},{"reference":"Alizon S. 2008. Decreased Overall Virulence in Coinfected Hosts Leads to the Persistence. The American Naturalist. 172: E67-E79.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/588077"},{"reference":"Alizon S, De Roode JC, Michalakis Y. 2013. Multiple Infections and the Evolution of Virulence. Ecology Letters. 16: 556-567.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/ele.12076"},{"reference":"Alizon S. 2013. Parasite Co-Transmission and the Evolutionary Epidemiology of Virulence. Evolution. 67: 921-933.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01827.x"},{"reference":"Ashby B, King KC. 2017. Friendly Foes: The Evolution of Host Protection by a Parasite. Evolution Letters. 1: 211-221.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1002/evl3.19"},{"reference":"Balmer O, Tanner M. 2011. Prevalence and Implications of Multiple-Strain Infections. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 11: 868-878.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70241-9"},{"reference":"Bell AS, De Roode JC, Sim D, Read AF. 2006. Within-Host Competition in Genetically Diverse Malaria Infections: Parsite. Evolution. 60: 1358-1371.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01215.x"},{"reference":"Ben Ami F, Mouton L, Ebert D. 2008. The Effects of Multiple Infections on the Expression and Evolution of. Evolution. 62: 1700-1711.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00391.x"},{"reference":"Brown SP, Hochberg ME, Grenfell BT. 2002. Does Multiple Infection Select for Raised Virulence?. Trends in Microbiology. 10: 401-405.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0966-842X(02)02413-7"},{"reference":"Chen CC, Louie S, Mc Cormick B, Walker WA, Shi HN. 2005. Concurrent Infection with an Intestinal Helminth Parasite Impairs Host. Infection and Immunity. 73: 5468-5481.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/iai.73.9.5468-5481.2005"},{"reference":"Cox FEG. 2001. Concomitant Infections, Parasites and Immune Responses. Parasitology. 122: S23-S38.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/S003118200001698X"},{"reference":"Devi P, Khan A, Chattopadhyay P, Mehta P, Sahni S, Sharma S, Pandey R. 2021. Co-Infections as Modulators of Disease Outcome: Minor Players or Major. Frontiers in Microbiology. 12","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2021.664386"},{"reference":"Fleming FM, Brooker S, Geiger SM, Caldas IR, Correa Oliveira R, Hotez PJ, Bethony JM. 2006. Synergistic Associations between Hookworm and Other Helminth Species in a. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 11: 56-64.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01541.x"},{"reference":"Ghosh E, Wallace M, Hufbauer RA. . `Disease-smart' Outcrossing Can Enhance Individual Fitness and Increase. Insect Conservation and Diversity. n/a","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/icad.12842"},{"reference":"Gower CM, Webster JP. 2005. Intraspecific Competition and the Evolution of Virulence in a Parasitic. Evolution. 59: 544-553.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01014.x"},{"reference":"Horowitz HW, Aguero Rosenfeld ME, Holmgren D, Mc Kenna D, Schwartz I, Cox ME, Wormser GP. 2013. Lyme Disease and Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis Coinfection: Impact of. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 56: 93-99.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/cid/cis852"},{"reference":"Karvonen A, Jokela J, Laine AL. 2019. Importance of Sequence and Timing in Parasite Coinfections. Trends in Parasitology. 35: 109-118.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pt.2018.11.007"},{"reference":"Kumar N, Sharma S, Barua S, Tripathi BN, Rouse BT. 2018. Virological and Immunological Outcomes of Coinfections. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 31: e00111-17.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/CMR.00111-17"},{"reference":"Kurz CL, Ewbank JJ. 2000. Caenorhabditis Elegans for the Study of Host--Pathogen Interactions. Trends in Microbiology. 8: 142-144.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01691-1"},{"reference":"Lello J, Boag B, Fenton A, Stevenson IR, Hudson PJ. 2004. Competition and Mutualism among the Gut Helminths of a Mammalian Host. Nature. 428: 840-844.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nature02490"},{"reference":"Levin BR, Bull JJ. 1994. Short-Sighted Evolution and the Virulence of Pathogenic Microorganisms. Trends in Microbiology. 2: 76-81.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0966-842X(94)90538-X"},{"reference":"Lewis JA, Penley MJ, Sylla H, Ahumada SD, Morran LT. 2022. Antagonistic Coevolution Limits the Range of Host Defense in C. Elegans. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 12","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fcimb.2022.758745"},{"reference":"May RM, Nowak MA. 1997. Coinfection and the Evolution of Parasite Virulence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 261: 209-215.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.1995.0138"},{"reference":"Morran LT, Parmenter MD, Phillips PC. 2009. Mutation Load and Rapid Adaptation Favour Outcrossing over. Nature. 462: 350-352.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nature08496"},{"reference":"Morran LT, Schmidt OG, Gelarden IA, Parrish RC, Lively CM. 2011. Running with the Red Queen: Host-parasite Coevolution Selects for. Science (New York, N. y. ). 333: 216-218.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1206360"},{"reference":"O Keeffe FE, Pendleton RC, Holland CV, Luijckx P. 2023. Increased Virulence Due to Multiple Infection in Daphnia Leads to Limited. Parasitology. 151: 58-67.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/S0031182023001130"},{"reference":"O Keeffe KR, Simha A, Mitchell CE. . Indirect Interactions among Co-Infecting Parasites and a Microbial. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 288: 20211313.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2021.1313"},{"reference":"Pasman L. 2012. The Complication of Coinfection. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 85: 127-132.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01465.x"},{"reference":"Petney TN, Andrews RH. 1998. Multiparasite Communities in Animals and Humans: Frequency, Structure and. International Journal for Parasitology. 28: 377-393.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0020-7519(97)00189-6"},{"reference":"Pradel E, Zhang Y, Pujol N, Matsuyama T, Bargmann CI, Ewbank JJ. 2007. Detection and Avoidance of a Natural Product from the Pathogenic Bacterium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of. 104: 2295-2300.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0610281104"},{"reference":"Prigot Maurice C, Beltran Bech S, Braquart Varnier C. 2022. Why and How Do Protective Symbionts Impact Immune Priming with Pathogens. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 126: 104245.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.dci.2021.104245"},{"reference":"Raberg L, De Roode JC, Bell AS, Stamou P, Gray D, Read AF. 2006. The Role of Immune-Mediated Apparent Competition in Genetically Diverse. The American Naturalist. 168: 41-53.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/505160"},{"reference":"Read AF, Taylor LH. 2001. The Ecology of Genetically Diverse Infections. Science (New York, N. Y. ). 292: 1099-1102.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1059410"},{"reference":"Rellstab C, Louhi KR, Karvonen A, Jokela J. 2011. Analysis of Trematode Parasite Communities in Fish Eye Lenses by. Infection, Genetics and Evolution: Journal of Molecular Epidemiology and. 11: 1276-1286.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.meegid.2011.04.018"},{"reference":"Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. 2005. Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape. Applied Statistics. 54: 507-554.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x"},{"reference":"Rovenolt FH, Tate AT. 2022. The Impact of Coinfection Dynamics on Host Competition and Coexistence. The American Naturalist. 199: 91-107.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/717180"},{"reference":"Rynkiewicz EC, Pedersen AB, Fenton A. 2015. An Ecosystem Approach to Understanding and Managing Within-Host Parasite. Trends in Parasitology. 31: 212-221.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pt.2015.02.005"},{"reference":"Schedl T, Kimble J. 1988. Fog-2, a Germ-Line-Specific Sex Determination Gene Required for. Genetics. 119: 43-61.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/genetics/119.1.43"},{"reference":"Schjorring S, Koella JC. 2003. Sub-Lethal Effects of Pathogens Can Lead to the Evolution of Lower. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 270: 189-193.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2002.2233"},{"reference":"Schmid Hempel P. 2021. Evolutionary Parasitology: The Integrated Study of Infections, Immunology,.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Schulenburg H, Ewbank JJ. 2004. Diversity and Specificity in the Interaction between Caenorhabditis. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 4: 49.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/1471-2148-4-49"},{"reference":"Seifi A, Nonomura T, Matsuda Y, Toyoda H, Bai Y. 2012. An Avirulent Tomato Powdery Mildew Isolate Induces Localized Acquired. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. 25: 372-378.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1094/MPMI-06-11-0171"},{"reference":"Slowinski SP, Morran LT, Parrish RC, Cui ER, Bhattacharya A, Lively CM, Phillips PC. 2016. Coevolutionary Interactions with Parasites Constrain the Spread of. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution. 70: 2632-2639.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/evo.13048"},{"reference":"Susi H, Vale PF, Laine AL. 2015. Host Genotype and Coinfection Modify the Relationship of within and. The American Naturalist. 186: 252-263.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/682069"},{"reference":"Telfer S, Birtles R, Bennett M, Lambin X, Paterson S, Begon M. 2008. Parasite Interactions in Natural Populations: Insights from Longitudinal. Parasitology. 135: 767-781.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/S0031182008000395"},{"reference":"Telfer S, Lambin X, Birtles R, Beldomenico P, Burthe S, Paterson S, Begon M. 2010. Species Interactions in a Parasite Community Drive Infection Risk in a. Science. 330: 243-246.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1190333"},{"reference":"Thumbi SM, Bronsvoort BMC, Poole EJ, Kiara H, Toye PG, Mbole Kariuki MN, et al., Woolhouse MEJ. 2014. Parasite Co-Infections and Their Impact on Survival of Indigenous Cattle. PLOS ONE. 9: e76324.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0076324"},{"reference":"West SA, Buckling A. 2003. Cooperation, Virulence and Siderophore Production in Bacterial Parasites. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 270: 37-44.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2002.2209"},{"reference":"Zilio G, Koella JC. 2020. Sequential Co-Infections Drive Parasite Competition and the Outcome of. Journal of Animal Ecology. 89: 2367-2377.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/1365-2656.13302"}],"title":"Simultaneous and Sequential Coexposures of Serratia marcescens in Caenorhabditis elegans
","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Robert Luallen"},"openAcknowledgement":true,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"Gary Craig Schindelman"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":"1776561816510"}]},{"id":"e1628b88-b116-4f7f-9277-933f54cee6fd","decision":"edit","abstract":"Coinfections are common in nature and include hosts simultaneously or sequentially exposed to different genotypes. We investigated the potential for simultaneous and sequential exposures to impact host fitness by exposing Caenorhabditis elegans hosts to different bacterial strains of Serratia marcescens. We found that in simultaneous exposures a highly virulent strain induced high mortality regardless of coexposure. In sequential exposures, the same highly virulent strain induced high mortality if it was the first strain introduced in a coexposure. Overall, we find host outcomes after coinfections may depend on particular parasite genotype combinations and infection timing.
","acknowledgements":"We would like to acknowledge the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, University of Minnesota for providing some of the worm strains used in these experiments.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Population Biology, Ecology, and Evolutionary Biology Graduate Program"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","dataCuration","methodology","project","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","investigation"],"email":"emily.smith@emory.edu","firstName":"Emily B.","lastName":"Smith","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, US","Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Biology","Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","project","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"jdg6200@psu.edu","firstName":"Jennifer D.","lastName":"Gresham","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Biology"],"credit":["dataCuration","conceptualization","methodology","investigation"],"email":"Andrewhuang33927@gmail.com","firstName":"Andrew","lastName":"Huang","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","fundingAcquisition","project","resources","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"levi.morran@emory.edu","firstName":"Levi T.","lastName":"Morran","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[{"description":"","doi":null,"resourceType":"Dataset","name":"Extended_Data_Corrected.docx","url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/9e8629c8f6d7e758bce0593dfafb1449.docx"}],"funding":"This work was funded by the National Science Foundation Division of Environmental Biology 1750553.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/3dde3ff1c6ce63d1a2043f6a754aa3c4.png"},"imageCaption":"Estimated proportion of host mortality after 48 hours of simultaneous and sequential exposures to parasite strains with 95% bootstrap confidence intervals. Color corresponds to host genotype. The left subplot of each set of data shows hosts exposed to one bacterial Serratia strain, while the right subplot of each set of data shows hosts exposed to multiple bacterial Serratia strains.
","imageTitle":"Estimated proportional host mortality under simultaneous and sequential coexposures
","methods":"Nematode Maintenance and Bacterial Strains
The C. elegans strain used for these experiments were all variants of the Hawaiian strain CB4856. The CF3-30 strain (referred to in Figure 1 as CF3) was created previously (Morran et al. 2009, 2011) from CB4856 C. elegans which contain the fog-2 (q71) mutant allele which prevents spermatogenesis in hermaphrodites (Schedl and Kimble 1988) making them obligately outcrossing. The CF3-30i strain (referred to in Figure 1 as CF3i) was created from backcrossing the wild-type fog-2 (q71) allele back into the CF3-30 background, restoring hermaphrodite spermatogenesis function. These populations were maintained on 100mm Petri dishes filled with Nematode Growth Medium-Lite (NGM-Lite, US Biological, Swampscott, MA, USA) and seeded with 200µl of Escherichia coli OP50 (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, University of Minnesota). Nematodes were allowed to grow, feed, and reproduce on these plates and were stored at 20°C.
The strains of S. marcescens and E. coli OP50 used for these experiments were grown in Luria Broth to carrying capacity, shaking overnight at 28°C. These liquid cultures were then used to seed Serratia Selection Plates (SSPs) as described previously (Morran et al. 2011). Strains used for both simultaneous and sequential infections included Sm2170 (Sue Katz, Rogers State University), Sm933 (Carolina Biological Supply), and SmDb11 (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, University of Minnesota). The C. elegans hosts show signs of infection with S. marcescens 24 hours after infection and interactions between S.marcescens and C. elegans have been previously characterized (Schulenburg and Ewbank 2004).
Exposure Assays
Serratia Selection Plates (SSPs), as described previously (Morran et al. 2011), were used to expose hosts to parasite strains. Briefly, the left third of the plate was seeded with the parasite strain of choice, the right third of the plate was seeded with E. coli OP50 food, and the middle third was not seeded and contained a strip of Ampicillin to prevent the carry-over of the parasite into the food lawn. The worm hosts were placed on the parasite lawns at the start of the assay and were given 24 hours to interact with the parasite and crawl across the plate to the lawn of food. After the first 24 hours, the surviving worms on the lawn of food were liquid transferred with M9 to another SSP for another 24 hours. The number of worms alive on the lawn of food after the second SSP exposure was counted after a total of 48 hours of potential parasite exposure. Simultaneously infected hosts were exposed to proportionally equal mixtures of bacterial strains and moved to another replicate of the same mixture to control for movement of worms after 24 hours. Sequential exposures were conducted by exposing host populations to a single bacterial strain lawn for 24 hours and then surviving individuals were moved to a secondary bacterial lawn for another 24 hours before survival counts were collected. Simultaneous assays were run in triplicate with 200 worms per replicate population. Sequential assays were conducted with 300 worms per population and five replicates per treatment.
Statistical Analysis
Mortality was analyzed as a continuous proportion using generalized additive models (GAMLSS) implemented in the gamlss package in R (Rigby and Stasinopoulos 2005). Because the mortality data included both exact zeros and ones, we fit a zero- and one- inflated beta distribution (BEINF), which explicitly models the probability of observing structural zeros and ones in addition to variation in intermediate values. Treatment and host genotype were included as fixed effects on the mean parameter (μ), while scale (σ) was modeled as constant, and the zero/one inflation parameter (ν) was allowed to vary with both treatment and genotype to account for potential heterogeneity in the frequency of zeros/ones across experimental conditions. Model adequacy was assessed using randomized quantile residuals and visual inspection of fitted values, which indicated good model convergence and adequate fit. Uncertainty in predicted mortality estimates were quantified using nonparametric bootstrapping of the BEINF model (n = 1,000, resampling with replacement, random set seed for reproducibility). Predicted means and 95% confidence intervals were calculated from the resulting bootstrap distributions. While the model was fit on the logit scale, all reported values and confidence intervals are back-transformed to the original 0–1 scale for interpretability and consistency with the figures. Pairwise comparisons between all treatments were then conducted post-hoc (Extended Data Table 4, Extended Data Table 6). All analyses were conducted in RStudio (RStudio Version 2025.05.1+513).
","reagents":"","patternDescription":"Coinfections, broadly defined as hosts experiencing two or more strain or species infections at once, are common in nature but can vary in their composition, order of exposure, duration of coexistence, and the amount of time between encounters with the initial and secondary infections (Petney and Andrews 1998; Cox 2001; Read and Taylor 2001; Fleming et al. 2006; Balmer and Tanner 2011; Rellstab et al. 2011; Thumbi et al. 2014; Rynkiewicz et al. 2015; Karvonen et al. 2019; Devi et al. 2021). Hosts can experience coinfections that are introduced at the same time (“simultaneous” coinfections), like the transmission of Borellia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum, the causative agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, in the bite of a single tick to a human host (Horowitz et al. 2013) or through trophic movement from a coinfected prey to a predator. Alternatively, hosts can experience coinfections that co-occur for some amount of time but are not introduced at the same time (“sequential” coinfections) such as influenza patients that secondarily experience respiratory system colonization with bacterial species that lead to pneumonia (Pasman 2012) or tomato plants infected with an avirulent strain of powdery mildew that then suppresses a secondary virulent strain (Seifi et al. 2012). The timing as well as the nature of the infecting parasites can have important consequences on host fitness, and ultimately, the evolutionary trajectories of the host and parasite populations (Telfer et al. 2008; Alizon et al. 2013; Karvonen et al. 2019; Zilio and Koella 2020; Schmid-Hempel 2021). Different strains of bacterial parasites might have additive or multiplicative effects on hosts relative to single strain infections when coexposed, but the way in which those effects might occur could encompass a variety of mechanisms.
First, coinfections differ from single infections because they create an environment in which competition between the coinfecting partners may exist. Competition between coinfections have been shown to either increase (Bell et al. 2006; Ben-Ami et al. 2008) or decrease (Gower and Webster 2005) virulence in host populations, emphasizing that the particular ecological context and specific interactions between players in coinfection scenarios may be important for predicting whether within-host competition will drive overall virulence up or down (Schjorring and Koella 2003; West and Buckling 2003; Alizon 2008; Ashby and King 2017; Karvonen et al. 2019). Another way coinfecting species may impact host-parasite dynamics is through immune priming. One coinfecting species or strain may trigger a host response that protects the host from other infections, effectively priming the host immune system to better tolerate other infections (Prigot-Maurice et al. 2022). Immune responses may alternatively be focused on a less virulent infection and could actually allow a more virulent coinfecting species to increase in frequency or select for increased virulence in the less-virulent coinfecting species, or competition among coinfecting strains may be to some degree mediated by the host immune system (Råberg et al. 2006). Coinfecting species or strains may also interact indirectly and potentially facilitate each other's success. For example, mice infected with Heligomosomoides polygyrus, an intestinal helminth, endure damaged epithelial junctions that then allowed for increased bacterial translocation across the epithelium (Chen et al. 2005). This kind of facilitation could result in higher virulence. Therefore, more research on the impact of coinfections on hosts is needed to better understand how coinfections might interact with each other and with their hosts.
We conducted both simultaneous and sequential exposures of different strains of the bacterial species Serratia marcescens (strains SmDb11, Sm933, and Sm2170) in the model host system, Caenorhabditis elegans. Infection timing can impact how the overall dynamic of coinfection proceeds (Lello et al. 2004; Telfer et al. 2008) and by using this host-parasite system we were able to systematically probe differences in host mortality due to simultaneously or sequentially exposed coinfections. S. marcescens is a gram-negative bacterial parasite that occurs commonly in soil, water, composts, and is naturally encountered by C. elegans in the environment (Alegado et al. 2003; Kurz and Ewbank 2003). C. elegans are initially attracted to S. marcescens and eat the bacteria, after which the bacteria colonize the intestine, causing damage to the intestinal tissue and inducing host mortality (Pradel et al. 2007). We measured host mortality in populations of C. elegans that were subjected to either simultaneous coexposures, sequential coexposures, or single infections.
Host strains used in these experiments include the Hawaiian strain CB4856, and two additional strains derived from this progenitor. Strain CF3-30 (CF3), which is an obligately outcrossing mutant of CB4856 that has been previously exposed to EMS mutagenesis, and CF3-30i (CF3i), which has the wild-type allele allowing for self-fertilization backcrossed back into the CF3 background. Because CB4856 exhibited reduced mortality rates in the simultaneous experiments and sequential infections were anticipated to be less virulent, we used CF3i in the sequential experiments as a better indicator of infection dynamics than CB4856.
Single Strain Exposures
Our data show that hosts exposed to S. marcescens strains SmDb11, Sm933, and Sm2170 exhibit increasing levels of host mortality, respectively. Simultaneous exposures in single strain infections refers to hosts exposed just to one strain. Simultaneous exposures to an Escherichia coli OP50 control resulted in low estimated proportional host mortality relative to other treatments, simultaneous exposures to SmDb11 resulted in higher estimated proportional host mortality, hosts simultaneously exposed to Sm933 had even higher levels of estimated proportional mortality, and hosts simultaneously exposed to Sm2170 had the highest levels of estimated proportional mortality (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 1). Estimated proportional host mortality in the single strain sequential data follows the same trend with sequential exposure to E. coli OP50 inducing little mortality, sequential exposure to SmDb11 inducing moderate relative mortality, Sm933 inducing higher relative mortality, and Sm2170 inducing the highest level of relative host mortality (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 2). This trend aligns with previous work categorizing the relative virulence of these strains in C. elegans (Lewis et al. 2022). In the simultaneous data, host genotype had a significant effect on mortality, with CF3-30 exhibiting significantly higher mortality than CB4856 across treatments (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 3). There was no significant effect of genotype in the sequential single strain data.
Multi-strain Exposures
Simultaneous exposures including the most virulent strain, Sm2170, led to consistently high levels of relative host mortality regardless of coexposed strain identity (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 1). This Sm2170 precedence was supported in the sequential exposures when Sm2170 was the first of the coexposed strains in the sequence (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 2). The relative mortality of sequential coexposures that introduced Sm2170 first hovered around roughly the same mortality range as Sm2170 in the single strain context, whereas coexposures in which Sm2170 was the secondary exposure had lower mortality (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 2). Coexposures of SmDb11 and Sm933 generated host mortality rates that were not statistically different than either single strain (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 4).
There are several possible explanations for why sequential exposures follow the same pattern as simultaneous exposures when Sm2170 is first in the sequence of exposures, but not the second. Strains in simultaneous exposures, while introduced at equal proportions, may end up with an over-representation of the more virulent strain after they have been in direct competition for some amount of time. Alternatively, exposing hosts to a sequence of strains may allow hosts to generate some level of tolerance or mount an immune response as a result of the first exposure before the introduction of a secondary exposure. It may also be the case that a lag in the time of parasite introduction could change the dynamic with which coexisting strains may interact with each other. A 24 hour lead time may also provide an otherwise out-competed strain to have a better chance of establishing and competing with a more virulent strain for longer. Further, the introduction of a highly virulent strain for 24 hours may provide an opportunity for that strain to dominate the gut environment before a second strain is introduced. This may explain why sequential coexposures in which hosts saw Sm2170 first had higher mortalities that were very similar to hosts exposed to single infections of Sm2170. Overall, we see no clear additive or multiplicative effects of coexposed strains on host mortality. Instead, our data, at least in the case of the most virulent bacterial strain, are consistent with simple competitive dominance hierarchy among strains that may determine the virulence of the interaction with the host. It's plausible that bacterial virulence may be directly associated with competitive ability or growth rate inside the host, thus allowing Sm2170 to be the dominant strain. Nonetheless, it appears that priority effects, or exposure order, also play a role in determining the outcome of these coexposures. These results were consistent across host genotypes CF3-30 and CF3-30i, but other host genotypes may vary in their response.
Overall, we conclude that the effect of coexposures on estimated proportional host mortality does not have a clear additive or multiplicative effect in the S. marcescens/C. elegans system, but priority effects, or exposure order, may influence virulence outcomes. Therefore, particular strain interactions in addition to timing of exposure may be important for determining the outcome of coexposures.
","references":[{"reference":"Alegado RA, Campbell MC, Chen WC, Slutz SS, Tan MW. 2003. Characterization of Mediators of Microbial Virulence and Innate Immunity. Cellular Microbiology. 5: 435-444.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.00287.x"},{"reference":"Alizon S. 2008. Decreased Overall Virulence in Coinfected Hosts Leads to the Persistence. The American Naturalist. 172: E67-E79.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/588077"},{"reference":"Alizon S, De Roode JC, Michalakis Y. 2013. Multiple Infections and the Evolution of Virulence. Ecology Letters. 16: 556-567.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/ele.12076"},{"reference":"Alizon S. 2013. Parasite Co-Transmission and the Evolutionary Epidemiology of Virulence. Evolution. 67: 921-933.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01827.x"},{"reference":"Ashby B, King KC. 2017. Friendly Foes: The Evolution of Host Protection by a Parasite. Evolution Letters. 1: 211-221.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1002/evl3.19"},{"reference":"Balmer O, Tanner M. 2011. Prevalence and Implications of Multiple-Strain Infections. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 11: 868-878.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70241-9"},{"reference":"Bell AS, De Roode JC, Sim D, Read AF. 2006. Within-Host Competition in Genetically Diverse Malaria Infections: Parsite. Evolution. 60: 1358-1371.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01215.x"},{"reference":"Ben Ami F, Mouton L, Ebert D. 2008. The Effects of Multiple Infections on the Expression and Evolution of. Evolution. 62: 1700-1711.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00391.x"},{"reference":"Brown SP, Hochberg ME, Grenfell BT. 2002. Does Multiple Infection Select for Raised Virulence?. Trends in Microbiology. 10: 401-405.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0966-842X(02)02413-7"},{"reference":"Chen CC, Louie S, Mc Cormick B, Walker WA, Shi HN. 2005. Concurrent Infection with an Intestinal Helminth Parasite Impairs Host. Infection and Immunity. 73: 5468-5481.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/iai.73.9.5468-5481.2005"},{"reference":"Cox FEG. 2001. Concomitant Infections, Parasites and Immune Responses. Parasitology. 122: S23-S38.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/S003118200001698X"},{"reference":"Devi P, Khan A, Chattopadhyay P, Mehta P, Sahni S, Sharma S, Pandey R. 2021. Co-Infections as Modulators of Disease Outcome: Minor Players or Major. Frontiers in Microbiology. 12","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2021.664386"},{"reference":"Fleming FM, Brooker S, Geiger SM, Caldas IR, Correa Oliveira R, Hotez PJ, Bethony JM. 2006. Synergistic Associations between Hookworm and Other Helminth Species in a. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 11: 56-64.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01541.x"},{"reference":"Ghosh E, Wallace M, Hufbauer RA. . `Disease-smart' Outcrossing Can Enhance Individual Fitness and Increase. Insect Conservation and Diversity. n/a","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/icad.12842"},{"reference":"Gower CM, Webster JP. 2005. Intraspecific Competition and the Evolution of Virulence in a Parasitic. Evolution. 59: 544-553.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01014.x"},{"reference":"Horowitz HW, Aguero Rosenfeld ME, Holmgren D, Mc Kenna D, Schwartz I, Cox ME, Wormser GP. 2013. Lyme Disease and Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis Coinfection: Impact of. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 56: 93-99.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/cid/cis852"},{"reference":"Karvonen A, Jokela J, Laine AL. 2019. Importance of Sequence and Timing in Parasite Coinfections. Trends in Parasitology. 35: 109-118.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pt.2018.11.007"},{"reference":"Kumar N, Sharma S, Barua S, Tripathi BN, Rouse BT. 2018. Virological and Immunological Outcomes of Coinfections. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 31: e00111-17.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/CMR.00111-17"},{"reference":"Kurz CL, Ewbank JJ. 2000. Caenorhabditis Elegans for the Study of Host--Pathogen Interactions. Trends in Microbiology. 8: 142-144.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01691-1"},{"reference":"Lello J, Boag B, Fenton A, Stevenson IR, Hudson PJ. 2004. Competition and Mutualism among the Gut Helminths of a Mammalian Host. Nature. 428: 840-844.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nature02490"},{"reference":"Levin BR, Bull JJ. 1994. Short-Sighted Evolution and the Virulence of Pathogenic Microorganisms. Trends in Microbiology. 2: 76-81.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0966-842X(94)90538-X"},{"reference":"Lewis JA, Penley MJ, Sylla H, Ahumada SD, Morran LT. 2022. Antagonistic Coevolution Limits the Range of Host Defense in C. Elegans. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 12","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fcimb.2022.758745"},{"reference":"May RM, Nowak MA. 1997. Coinfection and the Evolution of Parasite Virulence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 261: 209-215.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.1995.0138"},{"reference":"Morran LT, Parmenter MD, Phillips PC. 2009. Mutation Load and Rapid Adaptation Favour Outcrossing over. Nature. 462: 350-352.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nature08496"},{"reference":"Morran LT, Schmidt OG, Gelarden IA, Parrish RC, Lively CM. 2011. Running with the Red Queen: Host-parasite Coevolution Selects for. Science (New York, N. y. ). 333: 216-218.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1206360"},{"reference":"O Keeffe FE, Pendleton RC, Holland CV, Luijckx P. 2023. Increased Virulence Due to Multiple Infection in Daphnia Leads to Limited. Parasitology. 151: 58-67.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/S0031182023001130"},{"reference":"O Keeffe KR, Simha A, Mitchell CE. . Indirect Interactions among Co-Infecting Parasites and a Microbial. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 288: 20211313.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2021.1313"},{"reference":"Pasman L. 2012. The Complication of Coinfection. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 85: 127-132.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01465.x"},{"reference":"Petney TN, Andrews RH. 1998. Multiparasite Communities in Animals and Humans: Frequency, Structure and. International Journal for Parasitology. 28: 377-393.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0020-7519(97)00189-6"},{"reference":"Pradel E, Zhang Y, Pujol N, Matsuyama T, Bargmann CI, Ewbank JJ. 2007. Detection and Avoidance of a Natural Product from the Pathogenic Bacterium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of. 104: 2295-2300.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0610281104"},{"reference":"Prigot Maurice C, Beltran Bech S, Braquart Varnier C. 2022. Why and How Do Protective Symbionts Impact Immune Priming with Pathogens. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 126: 104245.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.dci.2021.104245"},{"reference":"Raberg L, De Roode JC, Bell AS, Stamou P, Gray D, Read AF. 2006. The Role of Immune-Mediated Apparent Competition in Genetically Diverse. The American Naturalist. 168: 41-53.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/505160"},{"reference":"Read AF, Taylor LH. 2001. The Ecology of Genetically Diverse Infections. Science (New York, N. Y. ). 292: 1099-1102.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1059410"},{"reference":"Rellstab C, Louhi KR, Karvonen A, Jokela J. 2011. Analysis of Trematode Parasite Communities in Fish Eye Lenses by. Infection, Genetics and Evolution: Journal of Molecular Epidemiology and. 11: 1276-1286.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.meegid.2011.04.018"},{"reference":"Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. 2005. Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape. Applied Statistics. 54: 507-554.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x"},{"reference":"Rovenolt FH, Tate AT. 2022. The Impact of Coinfection Dynamics on Host Competition and Coexistence. The American Naturalist. 199: 91-107.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/717180"},{"reference":"Rynkiewicz EC, Pedersen AB, Fenton A. 2015. An Ecosystem Approach to Understanding and Managing Within-Host Parasite. Trends in Parasitology. 31: 212-221.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pt.2015.02.005"},{"reference":"Schedl T, Kimble J. 1988. Fog-2, a Germ-Line-Specific Sex Determination Gene Required for. Genetics. 119: 43-61.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/genetics/119.1.43"},{"reference":"Schjorring S, Koella JC. 2003. Sub-Lethal Effects of Pathogens Can Lead to the Evolution of Lower. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 270: 189-193.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2002.2233"},{"reference":"Schmid Hempel P. 2021. Evolutionary Parasitology: The Integrated Study of Infections, Immunology,.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Schulenburg H, Ewbank JJ. 2004. Diversity and Specificity in the Interaction between Caenorhabditis. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 4: 49.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/1471-2148-4-49"},{"reference":"Seifi A, Nonomura T, Matsuda Y, Toyoda H, Bai Y. 2012. An Avirulent Tomato Powdery Mildew Isolate Induces Localized Acquired. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. 25: 372-378.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1094/MPMI-06-11-0171"},{"reference":"Slowinski SP, Morran LT, Parrish RC, Cui ER, Bhattacharya A, Lively CM, Phillips PC. 2016. Coevolutionary Interactions with Parasites Constrain the Spread of. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution. 70: 2632-2639.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/evo.13048"},{"reference":"Susi H, Vale PF, Laine AL. 2015. Host Genotype and Coinfection Modify the Relationship of within and. The American Naturalist. 186: 252-263.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/682069"},{"reference":"Telfer S, Birtles R, Bennett M, Lambin X, Paterson S, Begon M. 2008. Parasite Interactions in Natural Populations: Insights from Longitudinal. Parasitology. 135: 767-781.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/S0031182008000395"},{"reference":"Telfer S, Lambin X, Birtles R, Beldomenico P, Burthe S, Paterson S, Begon M. 2010. Species Interactions in a Parasite Community Drive Infection Risk in a. Science. 330: 243-246.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1190333"},{"reference":"Thumbi SM, Bronsvoort BMC, Poole EJ, Kiara H, Toye PG, Mbole Kariuki MN, et al., Woolhouse MEJ. 2014. Parasite Co-Infections and Their Impact on Survival of Indigenous Cattle. PLOS ONE. 9: e76324.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0076324"},{"reference":"West SA, Buckling A. 2003. Cooperation, Virulence and Siderophore Production in Bacterial Parasites. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 270: 37-44.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2002.2209"},{"reference":"Zilio G, Koella JC. 2020. Sequential Co-Infections Drive Parasite Competition and the Outcome of. Journal of Animal Ecology. 89: 2367-2377.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/1365-2656.13302"}],"title":"Simultaneous and Sequential Coexposures of Serratia marcescens in Caenorhabditis elegans
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"Gary Craig Schindelman"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]},{"id":"b7248423-d575-4ca1-ac6c-7e7497f86b51","decision":"publish","abstract":"Coinfections are common in nature and include hosts simultaneously or sequentially exposed to different genotypes. We investigated the potential for simultaneous and sequential exposures to impact host fitness by exposing Caenorhabditis elegans hosts to different bacterial strains of Serratia marcescens. We found that in simultaneous exposures a highly virulent strain induced high mortality regardless of coexposure. In sequential exposures, the same highly virulent strain induced high mortality if it was the first strain introduced in a coexposure. Overall, we find host outcomes after coinfections may depend on particular parasite genotype combinations and infection timing.
","acknowledgements":"We would like to acknowledge the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, University of Minnesota for providing some of the worm strains used in these experiments.
","authors":[{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Population Biology, Ecology, and Evolutionary Biology Graduate Program"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","dataCuration","methodology","project","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_originalDraft","writing_reviewEditing","investigation"],"email":"emily.smith@emory.edu","firstName":"Emily B.","lastName":"Smith","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, US","Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Biology","Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","dataCuration","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","project","supervision","validation","visualization","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"jdg6200@psu.edu","firstName":"Jennifer D.","lastName":"Gresham","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Biology"],"credit":["dataCuration","conceptualization","methodology","investigation"],"email":"Andrewhuang33927@gmail.com","firstName":"Andrew","lastName":"Huang","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Emory University, Atlanta, GA, US"],"departments":["Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","fundingAcquisition","project","resources","supervision","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"levi.morran@emory.edu","firstName":"Levi T.","lastName":"Morran","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[{"description":"Data Tables
","doi":"10.22002/q3f11-wwv74","resourceType":"Dataset","name":"Extended_Data_Corrected.docx","url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/9e8629c8f6d7e758bce0593dfafb1449.docx"}],"funding":"This work was funded by the National Science Foundation Division of Environmental Biology 1750553.
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/3dde3ff1c6ce63d1a2043f6a754aa3c4.png"},"imageCaption":"Estimated proportion of host mortality after 48 hours of simultaneous and sequential exposures to parasite strains with 95% bootstrap confidence intervals. Color corresponds to host genotype. The left subplot of each set of data shows hosts exposed to one bacterial Serratia strain, while the right subplot of each set of data shows hosts exposed to multiple bacterial Serratia strains.
","imageTitle":"Estimated proportional host mortality under simultaneous and sequential coexposures
","methods":"Nematode Maintenance and Bacterial Strains
The C. elegans strain used for these experiments were all variants of the Hawaiian strain CB4856. The CF3-30 strain (referred to in Figure 1 as CF3) was created previously (Morran et al. 2009, 2011) from CB4856 C. elegans which contain the fog-2 (q71) mutant allele which prevents spermatogenesis in hermaphrodites (Schedl and Kimble 1988) making them obligately outcrossing. The CF3-30i strain (referred to in Figure 1 as CF3i) was created from backcrossing the wild-type fog-2 (q71) allele back into the CF3-30 background, restoring hermaphrodite spermatogenesis function. These populations were maintained on 100mm Petri dishes filled with Nematode Growth Medium-Lite (NGM-Lite, US Biological, Swampscott, MA, USA) and seeded with 200µl of Escherichia coli OP50 (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, University of Minnesota). Nematodes were allowed to grow, feed, and reproduce on these plates and were stored at 20°C.
The strains of S. marcescens and E. coli OP50 used for these experiments were grown in Luria Broth to carrying capacity, shaking overnight at 28°C. These liquid cultures were then used to seed Serratia Selection Plates (SSPs) as described previously (Morran et al. 2011). Strains used for both simultaneous and sequential infections included Sm2170 (Sue Katz, Rogers State University), Sm933 (Carolina Biological Supply), and SmDb11 (Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, University of Minnesota). The C. elegans hosts show signs of infection with S. marcescens 24 hours after infection and interactions between S.marcescens and C. elegans have been previously characterized (Schulenburg and Ewbank 2004).
Exposure Assays
Serratia Selection Plates (SSPs), as described previously (Morran et al. 2011), were used to expose hosts to parasite strains. Briefly, the left third of the plate was seeded with the parasite strain of choice, the right third of the plate was seeded with E. coli OP50 food, and the middle third was not seeded and contained a strip of Ampicillin to prevent the carry-over of the parasite into the food lawn. The worm hosts were placed on the parasite lawns at the start of the assay and were given 24 hours to interact with the parasite and crawl across the plate to the lawn of food. After the first 24 hours, the surviving worms on the lawn of food were liquid transferred with M9 to another SSP for another 24 hours. The number of worms alive on the lawn of food after the second SSP exposure was counted after a total of 48 hours of potential parasite exposure. Simultaneously infected hosts were exposed to proportionally equal mixtures of bacterial strains and moved to another replicate of the same mixture to control for movement of worms after 24 hours. Sequential exposures were conducted by exposing host populations to a single bacterial strain lawn for 24 hours and then surviving individuals were moved to a secondary bacterial lawn for another 24 hours before survival counts were collected. Simultaneous assays were run in triplicate with 200 worms per replicate population. Sequential assays were conducted with 300 worms per population and five replicates per treatment.
Statistical Analysis
Mortality was analyzed as a continuous proportion using generalized additive models (GAMLSS) implemented in the gamlss package in R (Rigby and Stasinopoulos 2005). Because the mortality data included both exact zeros and ones, we fit a zero- and one- inflated beta distribution (BEINF), which explicitly models the probability of observing structural zeros and ones in addition to variation in intermediate values. Treatment and host genotype were included as fixed effects on the mean parameter (μ), while scale (σ) was modeled as constant, and the zero/one inflation parameter (ν) was allowed to vary with both treatment and genotype to account for potential heterogeneity in the frequency of zeros/ones across experimental conditions. Model adequacy was assessed using randomized quantile residuals and visual inspection of fitted values, which indicated good model convergence and adequate fit. Uncertainty in predicted mortality estimates were quantified using nonparametric bootstrapping of the BEINF model (n = 1,000, resampling with replacement, random set seed for reproducibility). Predicted means and 95% confidence intervals were calculated from the resulting bootstrap distributions. While the model was fit on the logit scale, all reported values and confidence intervals are back-transformed to the original 0–1 scale for interpretability and consistency with the figures. Pairwise comparisons between all treatments were then conducted post-hoc (Extended Data Table 4, Extended Data Table 6). All analyses were conducted in RStudio (RStudio Version 2025.05.1+513).
","reagents":"","patternDescription":"Coinfections, broadly defined as hosts experiencing two or more strain or species infections at once, are common in nature but can vary in their composition, order of exposure, duration of coexistence, and the amount of time between encounters with the initial and secondary infections (Petney and Andrews 1998; Cox 2001; Read and Taylor 2001; Fleming et al. 2006; Balmer and Tanner 2011; Rellstab et al. 2011; Thumbi et al. 2014; Rynkiewicz et al. 2015; Karvonen et al. 2019; Devi et al. 2021). Hosts can experience coinfections that are introduced at the same time (“simultaneous” coinfections), like the transmission of Borellia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum, the causative agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, in the bite of a single tick to a human host (Horowitz et al. 2013) or through trophic movement from a coinfected prey to a predator. Alternatively, hosts can experience coinfections that co-occur for some amount of time but are not introduced at the same time (“sequential” coinfections) such as influenza patients that secondarily experience respiratory system colonization with bacterial species that lead to pneumonia (Pasman 2012) or tomato plants infected with an avirulent strain of powdery mildew that then suppresses a secondary virulent strain (Seifi et al. 2012). The timing as well as the nature of the infecting parasites can have important consequences on host fitness, and ultimately, the evolutionary trajectories of the host and parasite populations (Telfer et al. 2008; Alizon et al. 2013; Karvonen et al. 2019; Zilio and Koella 2020; Schmid-Hempel 2021). Different strains of bacterial parasites might have additive or multiplicative effects on hosts relative to single strain infections when coexposed, but the way in which those effects might occur could encompass a variety of mechanisms.
First, coinfections differ from single infections because they create an environment in which competition between the coinfecting partners may exist. Competition between coinfections have been shown to either increase (Bell et al. 2006; Ben-Ami et al. 2008) or decrease (Gower and Webster 2005) virulence in host populations, emphasizing that the particular ecological context and specific interactions between players in coinfection scenarios may be important for predicting whether within-host competition will drive overall virulence up or down (Schjorring and Koella 2003; West and Buckling 2003; Alizon 2008; Ashby and King 2017; Karvonen et al. 2019). Another way coinfecting species may impact host-parasite dynamics is through immune priming. One coinfecting species or strain may trigger a host response that protects the host from other infections, effectively priming the host immune system to better tolerate other infections (Prigot-Maurice et al. 2022). Immune responses may alternatively be focused on a less virulent infection and could actually allow a more virulent coinfecting species to increase in frequency or select for increased virulence in the less-virulent coinfecting species, or competition among coinfecting strains may be to some degree mediated by the host immune system (Råberg et al. 2006). Coinfecting species or strains may also interact indirectly and potentially facilitate each other's success. For example, mice infected with Heligomosomoides polygyrus, an intestinal helminth, endure damaged epithelial junctions that then allowed for increased bacterial translocation across the epithelium (Chen et al. 2005). This kind of facilitation could result in higher virulence. Therefore, more research on the impact of coinfections on hosts is needed to better understand how coinfections might interact with each other and with their hosts.
We conducted both simultaneous and sequential exposures of different strains of the bacterial species Serratia marcescens (strains SmDb11, Sm933, and Sm2170) in the model host system, Caenorhabditis elegans. Infection timing can impact how the overall dynamic of coinfection proceeds (Lello et al. 2004; Telfer et al. 2008) and by using this host-parasite system we were able to systematically probe differences in host mortality due to simultaneously or sequentially exposed coinfections. S. marcescens is a gram-negative bacterial parasite that occurs commonly in soil, water, composts, and is naturally encountered by C. elegans in the environment (Alegado et al. 2003; Kurz and Ewbank 2003). C. elegans are initially attracted to S. marcescens and eat the bacteria, after which the bacteria colonize the intestine, causing damage to the intestinal tissue and inducing host mortality (Pradel et al. 2007). We measured host mortality in populations of C. elegans that were subjected to either simultaneous coexposures, sequential coexposures, or single infections.
Host strains used in these experiments include the Hawaiian strain CB4856, and two additional strains derived from this progenitor. Strain CF3-30 (CF3), which is an obligately outcrossing mutant of CB4856 that has been previously exposed to EMS mutagenesis, and CF3-30i (CF3i), which has the wild-type allele allowing for self-fertilization backcrossed back into the CF3 background. Because CB4856 exhibited reduced mortality rates in the simultaneous experiments and sequential infections were anticipated to be less virulent, we used CF3i in the sequential experiments as a better indicator of infection dynamics than CB4856.
Single Strain Exposures
Our data show that hosts exposed to S. marcescens strains SmDb11, Sm933, and Sm2170 exhibit increasing levels of host mortality, respectively. Simultaneous exposures in single strain infections refers to hosts exposed just to one strain. Simultaneous exposures to an Escherichia coli OP50 control resulted in low estimated proportional host mortality relative to other treatments, simultaneous exposures to SmDb11 resulted in higher estimated proportional host mortality, hosts simultaneously exposed to Sm933 had even higher levels of estimated proportional mortality, and hosts simultaneously exposed to Sm2170 had the highest levels of estimated proportional mortality (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 1). Estimated proportional host mortality in the single strain sequential data follows the same trend with sequential exposure to E. coli OP50 inducing little mortality, sequential exposure to SmDb11 inducing moderate relative mortality, Sm933 inducing higher relative mortality, and Sm2170 inducing the highest level of relative host mortality (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 2). This trend aligns with previous work categorizing the relative virulence of these strains in C. elegans (Lewis et al. 2022). In the simultaneous data, host genotype had a significant effect on mortality, with CF3-30 exhibiting significantly higher mortality than CB4856 across treatments (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 3). There was no significant effect of genotype in the sequential single strain data.
Multi-strain Exposures
Simultaneous exposures including the most virulent strain, Sm2170, led to consistently high levels of relative host mortality regardless of coexposed strain identity (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 1). This Sm2170 precedence was supported in the sequential exposures when Sm2170 was the first of the coexposed strains in the sequence (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 2). The relative mortality of sequential coexposures that introduced Sm2170 first hovered around roughly the same mortality range as Sm2170 in the single strain context, whereas coexposures in which Sm2170 was the secondary exposure had lower mortality (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 2). Coexposures of SmDb11 and Sm933 generated host mortality rates that were not statistically different than either single strain (Figure 1, Extended Data Table 4).
There are several possible explanations for why sequential exposures follow the same pattern as simultaneous exposures when Sm2170 is first in the sequence of exposures, but not the second. Strains in simultaneous exposures, while introduced at equal proportions, may end up with an over-representation of the more virulent strain after they have been in direct competition for some amount of time. Alternatively, exposing hosts to a sequence of strains may allow hosts to generate some level of tolerance or mount an immune response as a result of the first exposure before the introduction of a secondary exposure. It may also be the case that a lag in the time of parasite introduction could change the dynamic with which coexisting strains may interact with each other. A 24 hour lead time may also provide an otherwise out-competed strain to have a better chance of establishing and competing with a more virulent strain for longer. Further, the introduction of a highly virulent strain for 24 hours may provide an opportunity for that strain to dominate the gut environment before a second strain is introduced. This may explain why sequential coexposures in which hosts saw Sm2170 first had higher mortalities that were very similar to hosts exposed to single infections of Sm2170. Overall, we see no clear additive or multiplicative effects of coexposed strains on host mortality. Instead, our data, at least in the case of the most virulent bacterial strain, are consistent with simple competitive dominance hierarchy among strains that may determine the virulence of the interaction with the host. It's plausible that bacterial virulence may be directly associated with competitive ability or growth rate inside the host, thus allowing Sm2170 to be the dominant strain. Nonetheless, it appears that priority effects, or exposure order, also play a role in determining the outcome of these coexposures. These results were consistent across host genotypes CF3-30 and CF3-30i, but other host genotypes may vary in their response.
Overall, we conclude that the effect of coexposures on estimated proportional host mortality does not have a clear additive or multiplicative effect in the S. marcescens/C. elegans system, but priority effects, or exposure order, may influence virulence outcomes. Therefore, particular strain interactions in addition to timing of exposure may be important for determining the outcome of coexposures.
","references":[{"reference":"Alegado RA, Campbell MC, Chen WC, Slutz SS, Tan MW. 2003. Characterization of Mediators of Microbial Virulence and Innate Immunity. Cellular Microbiology. 5: 435-444.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.00287.x"},{"reference":"Alizon S. 2008. Decreased Overall Virulence in Coinfected Hosts Leads to the Persistence. The American Naturalist. 172: E67-E79.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/588077"},{"reference":"Alizon S, De Roode JC, Michalakis Y. 2013. Multiple Infections and the Evolution of Virulence. Ecology Letters. 16: 556-567.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/ele.12076"},{"reference":"Alizon S. 2013. Parasite Co-Transmission and the Evolutionary Epidemiology of Virulence. Evolution. 67: 921-933.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01827.x"},{"reference":"Ashby B, King KC. 2017. Friendly Foes: The Evolution of Host Protection by a Parasite. Evolution Letters. 1: 211-221.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1002/evl3.19"},{"reference":"Balmer O, Tanner M. 2011. Prevalence and Implications of Multiple-Strain Infections. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 11: 868-878.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70241-9"},{"reference":"Bell AS, De Roode JC, Sim D, Read AF. 2006. Within-Host Competition in Genetically Diverse Malaria Infections: Parsite. Evolution. 60: 1358-1371.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01215.x"},{"reference":"Ben Ami F, Mouton L, Ebert D. 2008. The Effects of Multiple Infections on the Expression and Evolution of. Evolution. 62: 1700-1711.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00391.x"},{"reference":"Brown SP, Hochberg ME, Grenfell BT. 2002. Does Multiple Infection Select for Raised Virulence?. Trends in Microbiology. 10: 401-405.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0966-842X(02)02413-7"},{"reference":"Chen CC, Louie S, Mc Cormick B, Walker WA, Shi HN. 2005. Concurrent Infection with an Intestinal Helminth Parasite Impairs Host. Infection and Immunity. 73: 5468-5481.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/iai.73.9.5468-5481.2005"},{"reference":"Cox FEG. 2001. Concomitant Infections, Parasites and Immune Responses. Parasitology. 122: S23-S38.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/S003118200001698X"},{"reference":"Devi P, Khan A, Chattopadhyay P, Mehta P, Sahni S, Sharma S, Pandey R. 2021. Co-Infections as Modulators of Disease Outcome: Minor Players or Major. Frontiers in Microbiology. 12","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2021.664386"},{"reference":"Fleming FM, Brooker S, Geiger SM, Caldas IR, Correa Oliveira R, Hotez PJ, Bethony JM. 2006. Synergistic Associations between Hookworm and Other Helminth Species in a. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 11: 56-64.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01541.x"},{"reference":"Ghosh E, Wallace M, Hufbauer RA. . `Disease-smart' Outcrossing Can Enhance Individual Fitness and Increase. Insect Conservation and Diversity. n/a","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/icad.12842"},{"reference":"Gower CM, Webster JP. 2005. Intraspecific Competition and the Evolution of Virulence in a Parasitic. Evolution. 59: 544-553.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01014.x"},{"reference":"Horowitz HW, Aguero Rosenfeld ME, Holmgren D, Mc Kenna D, Schwartz I, Cox ME, Wormser GP. 2013. Lyme Disease and Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis Coinfection: Impact of. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 56: 93-99.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/cid/cis852"},{"reference":"Karvonen A, Jokela J, Laine AL. 2019. Importance of Sequence and Timing in Parasite Coinfections. Trends in Parasitology. 35: 109-118.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pt.2018.11.007"},{"reference":"Kumar N, Sharma S, Barua S, Tripathi BN, Rouse BT. 2018. Virological and Immunological Outcomes of Coinfections. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 31: e00111-17.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/CMR.00111-17"},{"reference":"Kurz CL, Ewbank JJ. 2000. Caenorhabditis Elegans for the Study of Host--Pathogen Interactions. Trends in Microbiology. 8: 142-144.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01691-1"},{"reference":"Lello J, Boag B, Fenton A, Stevenson IR, Hudson PJ. 2004. Competition and Mutualism among the Gut Helminths of a Mammalian Host. Nature. 428: 840-844.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nature02490"},{"reference":"Levin BR, Bull JJ. 1994. Short-Sighted Evolution and the Virulence of Pathogenic Microorganisms. Trends in Microbiology. 2: 76-81.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/0966-842X(94)90538-X"},{"reference":"Lewis JA, Penley MJ, Sylla H, Ahumada SD, Morran LT. 2022. Antagonistic Coevolution Limits the Range of Host Defense in C. Elegans. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 12","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fcimb.2022.758745"},{"reference":"May RM, Nowak MA. 1997. Coinfection and the Evolution of Parasite Virulence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 261: 209-215.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.1995.0138"},{"reference":"Morran LT, Parmenter MD, Phillips PC. 2009. Mutation Load and Rapid Adaptation Favour Outcrossing over. Nature. 462: 350-352.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nature08496"},{"reference":"Morran LT, Schmidt OG, Gelarden IA, Parrish RC, Lively CM. 2011. Running with the Red Queen: Host-parasite Coevolution Selects for. Science (New York, N. y. ). 333: 216-218.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1206360"},{"reference":"O Keeffe FE, Pendleton RC, Holland CV, Luijckx P. 2023. Increased Virulence Due to Multiple Infection in Daphnia Leads to Limited. Parasitology. 151: 58-67.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/S0031182023001130"},{"reference":"O Keeffe KR, Simha A, Mitchell CE. . Indirect Interactions among Co-Infecting Parasites and a Microbial. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 288: 20211313.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2021.1313"},{"reference":"Pasman L. 2012. The Complication of Coinfection. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 85: 127-132.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01465.x"},{"reference":"Petney TN, Andrews RH. 1998. Multiparasite Communities in Animals and Humans: Frequency, Structure and. International Journal for Parasitology. 28: 377-393.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/S0020-7519(97)00189-6"},{"reference":"Pradel E, Zhang Y, Pujol N, Matsuyama T, Bargmann CI, Ewbank JJ. 2007. Detection and Avoidance of a Natural Product from the Pathogenic Bacterium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of. 104: 2295-2300.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0610281104"},{"reference":"Prigot Maurice C, Beltran Bech S, Braquart Varnier C. 2022. Why and How Do Protective Symbionts Impact Immune Priming with Pathogens. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 126: 104245.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.dci.2021.104245"},{"reference":"Raberg L, De Roode JC, Bell AS, Stamou P, Gray D, Read AF. 2006. The Role of Immune-Mediated Apparent Competition in Genetically Diverse. The American Naturalist. 168: 41-53.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/505160"},{"reference":"Read AF, Taylor LH. 2001. The Ecology of Genetically Diverse Infections. Science (New York, N. Y. ). 292: 1099-1102.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1059410"},{"reference":"Rellstab C, Louhi KR, Karvonen A, Jokela J. 2011. Analysis of Trematode Parasite Communities in Fish Eye Lenses by. Infection, Genetics and Evolution: Journal of Molecular Epidemiology and. 11: 1276-1286.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.meegid.2011.04.018"},{"reference":"Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. 2005. Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape. Applied Statistics. 54: 507-554.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x"},{"reference":"Rovenolt FH, Tate AT. 2022. The Impact of Coinfection Dynamics on Host Competition and Coexistence. The American Naturalist. 199: 91-107.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/717180"},{"reference":"Rynkiewicz EC, Pedersen AB, Fenton A. 2015. An Ecosystem Approach to Understanding and Managing Within-Host Parasite. Trends in Parasitology. 31: 212-221.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pt.2015.02.005"},{"reference":"Schedl T, Kimble J. 1988. Fog-2, a Germ-Line-Specific Sex Determination Gene Required for. Genetics. 119: 43-61.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/genetics/119.1.43"},{"reference":"Schjorring S, Koella JC. 2003. Sub-Lethal Effects of Pathogens Can Lead to the Evolution of Lower. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 270: 189-193.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2002.2233"},{"reference":"Schmid Hempel P. 2021. Evolutionary Parasitology: The Integrated Study of Infections, Immunology,.","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Schulenburg H, Ewbank JJ. 2004. Diversity and Specificity in the Interaction between Caenorhabditis. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 4: 49.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/1471-2148-4-49"},{"reference":"Seifi A, Nonomura T, Matsuda Y, Toyoda H, Bai Y. 2012. An Avirulent Tomato Powdery Mildew Isolate Induces Localized Acquired. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. 25: 372-378.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1094/MPMI-06-11-0171"},{"reference":"Slowinski SP, Morran LT, Parrish RC, Cui ER, Bhattacharya A, Lively CM, Phillips PC. 2016. Coevolutionary Interactions with Parasites Constrain the Spread of. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution. 70: 2632-2639.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/evo.13048"},{"reference":"Susi H, Vale PF, Laine AL. 2015. Host Genotype and Coinfection Modify the Relationship of within and. The American Naturalist. 186: 252-263.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1086/682069"},{"reference":"Telfer S, Birtles R, Bennett M, Lambin X, Paterson S, Begon M. 2008. Parasite Interactions in Natural Populations: Insights from Longitudinal. Parasitology. 135: 767-781.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1017/S0031182008000395"},{"reference":"Telfer S, Lambin X, Birtles R, Beldomenico P, Burthe S, Paterson S, Begon M. 2010. Species Interactions in a Parasite Community Drive Infection Risk in a. Science. 330: 243-246.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1126/science.1190333"},{"reference":"Thumbi SM, Bronsvoort BMC, Poole EJ, Kiara H, Toye PG, Mbole Kariuki MN, et al., Woolhouse MEJ. 2014. Parasite Co-Infections and Their Impact on Survival of Indigenous Cattle. PLOS ONE. 9: e76324.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0076324"},{"reference":"West SA, Buckling A. 2003. Cooperation, Virulence and Siderophore Production in Bacterial Parasites. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 270: 37-44.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2002.2209"},{"reference":"Zilio G, Koella JC. 2020. Sequential Co-Infections Drive Parasite Competition and the Outcome of. Journal of Animal Ecology. 89: 2367-2377.","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/1365-2656.13302"}],"title":"Simultaneous and Sequential Coexposures of Serratia marcescens in Caenorhabditis elegans
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[{"curator":{"displayName":"Gary Craig Schindelman"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"submitted":null}]}]}},"species":{"species":[{"value":"acer saccharum","label":"Acer saccharum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"TreeGenes","modLink":"https://treegenesdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"achillea millefolium","label":"Achillea millefolium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"acinetobacter baylyi","label":"Acinetobacter baylyi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"actinobacteria bacterium","label":"Actinobacteria bacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adelges tsugae","label":"Adelges tsugae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adenocaulon chilense","label":"Adenocaulon chilense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aedes japonicus","label":"Aedes japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aegorhinus vitulus","label":"Aegorhinus vitulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alaimidae","label":"Alaimidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"allobates femoralis","label":"Allobates femoralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alnus glutinosa","label":"Alnus glutinosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa aestivalis","label":"Alosa aestivalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa pseudoharengus","label":"Alosa pseudoharengus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alternaria alternata","label":"Alternaria alternata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"amynthas agrestis","label":"Amynthas Agrestis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma caninum","label":"Ancylostoma caninum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma ceylanicum","label":"Ancylostoma ceylanicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anemone multifida","label":"Anemone multifida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anguilla rostrata","label":"Anguilla rostrata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anisakis simplex","label":"Anisakis simplex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anomala albopilosa","label":"Anomala albopilosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arabidopsis","label":"Arabidopsis","imageSrc":"arabidopsis.png","imageAlt":"Arabidopsis graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"TAIR","modLink":"https://arabidopsis.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"architeuthis dux","label":"Architeuthis dux","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arion vulgaris","label":"Arion vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"armeria","label":"Armeria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"artemia","label":"Artemia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arthrobacter sp.","label":"Arthrobacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia","label":"Ascaridia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia galli","label":"Ascaridia galli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"asparagopsis taxiformis","label":"Asparagopsis taxiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"astatotilapia burtoni","label":"Astatotilapia burtoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"avena sativa","label":"Avena sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aves","label":"Aves","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus","label":"Bacillus (firmicutes)","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus cereus","label":"Bacillus cereus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus mycoides","label":"Bacillus mycoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus subtilis","label":"Bacillus subtilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus thuringiensis","label":"Bacillus thuringiensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus toyonensis","label":"Bacillus toyonensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus wiedmannii","label":"Bacillus wiedmannii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteria","label":"Bacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteriophage","label":"Bacteriophage","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bactrocera","label":"Bactrocera sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"batrachospermum gelatinosum","label":"Batrachospermum gelatinosum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula lenta","label":"Betula lenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula nigra","label":"Betula nigra","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus dahlbohmii","label":"Bombus dahlbohmii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus terrestris","label":"Bombus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombyx mori","label":"Bombyx mori","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bos taurus","label":"Bos Taurus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brachygobius doriae","label":"Brachygobius doriae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica oleracea","label":"Brassica oleracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica rapa","label":"Brassica rapa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brugia malayi","label":"Brugia malayi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"burkholderia thailandensis","label":"Burkholderia thailandensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"buttiauxella","label":"Buttiauxella","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis brenneri","label":"Caenorhabditis brenneri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis briggsae","label":"Caenorhabditis briggsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"c. elegans","label":"Caenorhabditis elegans","imageSrc":"c-elegans.jpg","imageAlt":"C. elegans graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis inopinata","label":"Caenorhabditis inopinata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis japonica","label":"Caenorhabditis japonica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis nigoni","label":"Caenorhabditis nigoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis remanei","label":"Caenorhabditis remanei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis tropicalis","label":"Caenorhabditis tropicalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus","label":"Calidifontibacillus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","label":"Calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calliphora sp","label":"Calliphora sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caltha sagittata","label":"Caltha sagittata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cambarus latimanus","label":"Cambarus latimanus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"candida albicans","label":"Candida albicans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"canis familiaris","label":"Canis familiaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cannabis sativa","label":"Cannabis sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caretta caretta","label":"Caretta caretta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cassiopea xamachana","label":"Cassiopea xamachana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caulobacter vibrioides","label":"Caulobacter vibrioides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cephalopods","label":"Cephalopoda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cerastium arvense","label":"Cerastium arvense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceriodaphnia","label":"Ceriodaphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceroglossus suturalis","label":"Ceroglossus suturalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chaetoceros","label":"Chaetoceros","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chamaecrista fasciculata","label":"Chamaecrista fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chilicola chalcidiformis","label":"Chilicola chalcidiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chitinimonas","label":"Chitinimonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chlamydomonas reinhardtii","label":"Chlamydomonas reinhardtii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chromobacterium","label":"Chromobacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysemys picta","label":"Chrysemys picta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysoperla rufilabris","label":"Chrysoperla rufilabris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"citrus","label":"Citrus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"clavibacter sp.","label":"Clavibacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"colinus virginianus","label":"Colinus virginianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crassostrea virginica","label":"Crassostrea virginica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crithidia fasciculata","label":"Crithidia fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cutibacterium acnes","label":"Cutibacterium acnes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cyanobacteria","label":"Cyanobacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia","label":"Daphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia pulex","label":"Daphnia pulex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera","label":"Diabrotica virgifera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","label":"Diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"d. discoideum","label":"Dictyostelium discoideum","imageSrc":"dicty.png","imageAlt":"D. discoideum","mod":"dictyBase","modLink":"http://dictybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diptera","label":"Diptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dotocryptus bellicosus","label":"Dotocryptus bellicosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drechmeria coniospora","label":"Drechmeria coniospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drosophila","label":"Drosophila","imageSrc":"drosophila.png","imageAlt":"Drosophila graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"FlyBase","modLink":"https://flybase.org/doi/","linkVariable":"doi"},{"value":"dryopteris campyloptera","label":"Dryopteris campyloptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris expansa","label":"Dryopteris expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris intermedia","label":"Dryopteris intermedia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dugesia dorotocephala","label":"Dugesia dorotocephala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"elasmobranchii","label":"Elasmobranchii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"embryophyta","label":"Embryophyta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enoploteuthis chunii","label":"Enoploteuthis chunii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterobacter aerogenes","label":"Enterobacter aerogenes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterococcus raffinosus","label":"Enterococcus raffinosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"epichloë coenophiala","label":"Epichloë coenophiala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"equus caballus","label":"Equus caballus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erigeron sp","label":"Erigeron sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eristalis","label":"Eristalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eruca vesicaria","label":"Eruca vesicaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erwinia carotovora","label":"Erwinia carotovora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erythronium americanum","label":"Erythronium americanum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"escherichia coli","label":"Escherichia coli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eukaryota","label":"Eukaryotes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"felis catus","label":"Felis catus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella novicida","label":"Francisella novicida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella tularensis","label":"Francisella tularensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fraxinus americana","label":"Fraxinus americana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fucus distichus","label":"Fucus distichus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fungi","label":"Fungi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gasteropelecus sp.","label":"Gasteropelecus sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"geranium sp","label":"Geranium sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"girardia","label":"Girardia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glaucomys volans","label":"Glaucomys volans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glycine max","label":"Glycine max","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Soybase","modLink":"https://soybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glyptemys insculpta","label":"Glyptemys insculpta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gossypium hirsutum","label":"Gossypium hirsutum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"CottonGen","modLink":"https://www.cottongen.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gromphadorhina portentosa","label":"Gromphadorhina portentosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gryllodes sigillatus","label":"Gryllodes sigillatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"haliotis rufescens","label":"Haliotis rufescens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hepacivirus hominis","label":"Hepatitis C Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"herpes simplex virus type 1","label":"Herpes simplex virus type 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human","label":"Human","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human coronavirus oc43","label":"Human coronavirus OC43","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydra vulgaris","label":"Hydra vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydropsyche sp","label":"Hydropsyche sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hymenoptera","label":"Hymenoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Hymenoptera Genome Database","modLink":"https://hymenoptera.elsiklab.missouri.edu/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypochaeris radicata","label":"Hypochaeris radicata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypodynerus vespiformis","label":"Hypodynerus vespiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflaviridae","label":"Iflaviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflavuris","label":"Iflavirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ipomoea hederacea","label":"Ipomoea hederacea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera","label":"Ischnomera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera ruficollis","label":"Ischnomera ruficollis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"julidochromis marlieri","label":"Julidochromis marlieri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"juniperus virginiana","label":"Juniperus virginiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"kluyveromyces marxianus","label":"Kluyveromyces marxianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"l. casei","label":"L. casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lacticaseibacillus casei","label":"Lacticaseibacillus casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"larentiinae sp","label":"Larentiinae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"laurus nobilis","label":"Laurus nobilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lepidoptera","label":"Lepidoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"leucanthemum vulgare","label":"Leucanthemum vulgare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"linepithema humile","label":"Linepithema humile","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"liometopum occidentale","label":"Liometopum occidentale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lolium arundinaceum","label":"Lolium arundinaceum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbriculus variegatus","label":"Lumbriculus variegatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbricus terrestris","label":"Lumbricus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lupinus polyphyllus","label":"Lupinus polyphyllus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lycorma delicatula","label":"Lycorma delicatula","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lynx rufus","label":"Lynx rufus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"magnaporthe oryzae","label":"Magnaporthe oryzae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mammalia","label":"Mammalia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"manihot esculenta","label":"Manihot esculenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"medicago lupulina","label":"Medicago lupulina","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"meloidogyne","label":"Meloidogyne","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mimus polyglottos","label":"Mimus polyglottos","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bryophyta","label":"Mosses","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mouse","label":"Mouse","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MGI","modLink":"https://informatics.jax.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"m. minutoides","label":"Mus minutoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mycobacterium smegmatis","label":"Mycobacterium smegmatis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nakaseomyces glabratus","label":"Nakaseomyces glabratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nauphoeta cinerea","label":"Nauphoeta cinerea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"neurospora","label":"Neurospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"n. benthamiana","label":"Nicotiana benthamiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/Nicotiana_benthamiana/genome","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nicotiana tabacum","label":"Nicotiana tabacum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae","label":"Noctuidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae sp","label":"Noctuidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nothobranchius furzeri","label":"Nothobranchius furzeri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"onchocerca volvulus","label":"Onchocerca volvulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"orconectes virilis","label":"Orconectes virilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ormia ochracea","label":"Ormia ochracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"o. sativa","label":"Oryza sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Gramene","modLink":"https://www.gramene.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"other","label":"Other","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"oxalis enneaphylla","label":"Oxalis enneaphylla","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea","label":"Pantoea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea agglomerans","label":"Pantoea agglomerans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"papaver sp","label":"Papaver sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paramecium bursaria","label":"Paramecium bursaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"partitiviridae","label":"Partitiviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pelodiscus sinensis","label":"Pelodiscus sinensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"perezia recurvata","label":"Perezia recurvata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"petromyzon marinus","label":"Petromyzon marinus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis","label":"Photinus pyralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","label":"Photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","label":"Photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"physcomitrium patens","label":"Physcomitrium patens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus strobus","label":"Pinus strobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus taeda","label":"Pinus taeda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"platycheirus","label":"Platycheirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"plectus sambesii","label":"Plectus sambesii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pogonomyrmex occidentalis","label":"Pogonomyrmex occidentalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"poncirus trifoliata","label":"Poncirus trifoliata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"populus deltoides","label":"Populus deltoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"potato virus y","label":"Potato virus Y","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"primula magellanica","label":"Primula magellanica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pristionchus pacificus","label":"Pristionchus pacificus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"prunus persica","label":"Prunus persica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Genome Database for Rosaceae","modLink":"https://www.rosaceae.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"psalmopoeus iriminia","label":"Psalmopoeus iriminia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudanabaena sp.","label":"Pseudanabaena sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas","label":"Pseudomonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas aeruginosa","label":"Pseudomonas aeruginosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas glycinae","label":"Pseudomonas glycinae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas putida","label":"Pseudomonas putida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas syringae","label":"Pseudomonas syringae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pterophyllum scalare","label":"Pterophyllum scalare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"python regius","label":"Python regius","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"quercus macrocarpa","label":"Quercus macrocarpa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ralstonia solanacearum","label":"Ralstonia solanacearum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranitomeya imitator","label":"Ranitomeya imitator","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranunculus peduncularis","label":"Ranunculus peduncularis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rat","label":"Rat","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"RGD","modLink":"https://rgd.mcw.edu","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rheinheimera","label":"Rheinheimera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ribes rubrum","label":"Ribes rubrum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sars-cov-2","label":"SARS-CoV-2","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. cerevisiae","label":"Saccharomyces cerevisiae","imageSrc":"yeast.png","imageAlt":"Yeast graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"SGD","modLink":"https://yeastgenome.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"saccharomyces paradoxus","label":"Saccharomyces paradoxus ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. uvarum","label":"Saccharomyces uvarum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schistosoma","label":"Schistosoma","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schizosaccharomyces japonicus","label":"Schizosaccharomyces japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. pombe","label":"Schizosaccharomyces pombe","imageSrc":"pombe.png","imageAlt":"Pombe graphic by Zoe Zorn © Caltech","mod":"PomBase","modLink":"https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:","linkVariable":"pmId"},{"value":"schmidtea mediterranea","label":"Schmidtea mediterranea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"senecio sp","label":"Senecio sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"simocephalus","label":"Simocephalus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"siraitia grosvenorii","label":"Siraitia grosvenorii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"solanum lycopersicum","label":"Solanum lycopersicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/1/view/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sorghum","label":"Sorghum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"SorghumBase","modLink":"https://www.sorghumbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"spiroplasma eriocheiris","label":"Spiroplasma eriocheiris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus aureus","label":"Staphylococcus aureus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus epidermidis","label":"Staphylococcus epidermidis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema carpocapsae","label":"Steinernema carpocapsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema hermaphroditum","label":"Steinernema hermaphroditum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"stenotrophomonas geniculata","label":"Stenotrophomonas geniculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus gordonii ","label":"Streptococcus gordonii ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus mutans","label":"Streptococcus mutans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":" streptococcus pneumoniae","label":"Streptococcus pneumoniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. purpuratus","label":"Strongylocentrotus purpuratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Echinobase","modLink":"https://www.echinobase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"strongyloides ratti","label":"Strongyloides ratti","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sulfolobus","label":"Sulfolobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"symphoricarpos albus","label":"Symphoricarpos albus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syncirsodes","label":"Syncirsodes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"synechococcus elongatus","label":"Synechococcus elongatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syrphidae","label":"Syrphidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","label":"Tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"taraxacum officinale","label":"Taraxacum officinale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tatochila theodice","label":"Tatochila theodice","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetrahymena","label":"Tetrahymena","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetramorium immigrans","label":"Tetramorium immigrans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tomato brown rugose fruit virus","label":"ToBRFV","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trachemys scripta","label":"Trachemys scripta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tribolium castaneum","label":"Tribolium castaneum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichoptera","label":"Trichoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichuris muris","label":"Trichuris muris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trifolium repens","label":"Trifolium repens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trypoxylus dichotomus","label":"Trypoxylus dichotomus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tsuga canadensis","label":"Tsuga canadensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ulva expansa","label":"Ulva expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"universal","label":"Universal","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"vargula hilgendorfii","label":"Vargula hilgendorfii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"vespula vulgaris","label":"Vespula vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"virus","label":"Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"watasenia scintillans","label":"Watasenia scintillans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"wolbachia pipientis","label":"Wolbachia pipientis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenopus","label":"Xenopus","imageSrc":"xenopus.png","imageAlt":"Xenopus graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"XenBase","modLink":"https://xenbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenorhabdus griffiniae","label":"Xenorhabdus griffiniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"yramea cytheris","label":"Yramea cytheris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zaprionus indianus","label":"Zaprionus indianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zea mays","label":"Zea mays","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MaizeGDB","modLink":"https://www.maizegdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zebrafish","label":"Zebrafish","imageSrc":"zebrafish.png","imageAlt":"Zebrafish graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"ZFIN","modLink":"https://zfin.org","linkVariable":""}]}},"pageContext":{"id":"a42d8167-326a-4afc-85e1-d0b286d8b5c5","citedBy":[],"parsedCsv":{"csvHeader":[],"csvData":[]}}}, "staticQueryHashes": ["2114697108"]}