Escherichia albertii is a zoonotic pathogen frequently misidentified as diarrheagenic E. coli due to shared phenotypic and genetic traits, yet functional genomic studies in this species have been limited by the inefficiency of traditional genetic tools. To address this, we developed a bipartite CRISPR/Cas9-assisted lambda red (𝛌-Red) recombineering system for efficient, markerless genome editing in E. albertii. As proof of principle, we targeted the nonessential lacZ gene for negative selection by using Cas9 to generate lethal double stranded breaks in unedited cells. Using a recombinogenic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) oligonucleotide to introduce a premature stop codon and an NheI restriction site, we achieved a recombination efficiency of 53%. Extending the induction time of the 𝛌-Red recombinase genes enhanced recombineering efficiency to 80%. This optimized CRISPR-assisted platform, the first reported application of its kind in E. albertii, enables the rapid generation of scarless mutations and provides a robust tool for the systematic analysis of E. albertii virulence factors and regulatory networks.
","acknowledgements":"","authors":[{"affiliations":["Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA, US"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["investigation","writing_reviewEditing","methodology","formalAnalysis"],"email":"sk10883114@sju.edu","firstName":"Shahab Ahmad","lastName":"Khan","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA, US"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"tm10760521@sju.edu","firstName":"Tara Marie","lastName":"Miller","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA, US"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","resources","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"sbhatt@sju.edu","firstName":"Shantanu","lastName":"Bhatt","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA, US"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","project","resources","supervision","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"eli@sju.edu","firstName":"Edwin","lastName":"Li","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0006-8621-4625"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":null,"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided by SJU Summer Scholars Program, SJU John P. McNulty Program for Leadership in Science and Mathematics, and SJU Department of Biology
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/93033dccf4d07f7242109a3c2584ba0e.jpg"},"imageCaption":"(A) A two-plasmid system was used to deliver the components necessary to create a double stranded break (DSB) in the lacZ gene. Following electroporation of E. albertii LMG20976 with pEcCas and induction of the lambda red genes, cells were transformed with pgRNA_Ealbertii, encoding an sgRNA complementary to the 5’ end of the lacZ ORF of E. albertii (underlined). A pgRNA expressing a noncomplementary sgRNA, pgRNA_Ecoli, was used as a control. For recombination, a recombinogenic ssDNA oligonucleotide with a premature stop codon and an NheI restriction site was used. Electroporation and recombination efficiencies were measured in cells after (B) 4-hr or (C) 24-hr induction of lambda red genes. Electroporation efficiency was measured as the total number of colonies forming units (CFU) per microgram of pgRNA_Ecoli or pgRNA_Ealbertii. Recombination efficiency was measured as the percentage of colonies with the NheI restriction site in cells co-electroporated with a recombinogenic (E. albertii) or nonrecombinogenic (E. coli) ssDNA oligonucleotide. A total of 36 colonies (12 colonies from each independent experiment) were tested for each co-electroporation experiment. Recombination efficiencies were not determined (ND) when cells were electroporated without a ssDNA oligonucleotide. (D) Colony PCR and NheI digestion were used to identify successful recombinants. PCR amplification with EL251106b and EL251106c primers yielded a 1,478 bp product (top gel). Successful oligonucleotide recombination generated products of 996 bp and 482 bp upon NheI digestion (bottom gel). Agarose gels from a representative 12 colonies from a co-electroporation experiment with pgRNA_Ealbertii and the recombinogenic ssDNA is shown. Lane 1: ladder; lane 2: wild type E. albertii colony; lanes 7, 9, 10: escapers; lanes 3, 5, 6, 8, 11-15: recombination-positive colonies. (E) Sanger sequencing using primer EL251106a confirmed that Cas9 targeted the lacZ segment in wild type E. albertii and lambda red recombinase introduced a stop codon and an NheI restriction site (boxes). (F) Blue-white screening on X-Gal plates confirmed the successful disruption of the lacZ gene. Representative colonies are shown for all the five different pgRNA electroporation experiments. Plate 1: pgRNA_Ecoli only; Plate 2: pgRNA_Ecoli + recombinogenic ssDNA; Plate 3: pgRNA_Ealbertii only; Plate 4: pgRNA_Ealbertii + nonrecombinogenic ssDNA; Plate 5: pgRNA_Ealbertii + recombinogenic ssDNA.
","imageTitle":"CRISPR/Cas9-assisted lambda red recombination in E. albertii
","methods":"Bacterial strains, plasmids, primers, oligonucleotides, and growth conditions
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and oligonucleotides used in this work are listed in Tables 1 and 2. E. coli DH5α (New England Biolabs) was used to maintain and propagate the plasmid pEcCas (Addgene #73227), pgRNA-bacteria (Addgene #44251) and its derivatives. pEcCas carries the cas9, lambda red, and kanamycin resistance genes. The pgRNA-bacteria backbone was used to synthesize (Genscript) pgRNA_Ealbertii, encoding a specific sgRNA targeting the lacZ gene in E. albertii; conversely, a non-targeting control pgRNA was constructed using a spacer sequence corresponding to the E. coli lacZ gene (pgRNA_Ecoli). All the oligonucleotides were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) at the 25-nm scale using standard desalting.
Bacterial strains were first streaked onto Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates supplemented with or without antibiotics and then grown aerobically in LB broth culture tubes at 37°C and 180 rpm for ~16-20 hours. The recombinant strains carrying plasmids pEcCas and pgRNA were selected on kanamycin and ampicillin at concentrations of 50 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL, respectively.
TABLE 1 Strains and plasmids used in this study | ||
Strains | Relevant Characteristics | Source or Reference |
DH5α | E. coli F− endA1 glnV44 thi-1 recA1 relA1 gyrA96 deoR nupG ϕ80dlacZΔM15 Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169, hsdR17(rK− mK+) λ− | New England Biolabs #C2988J |
LMG20976 | E. albertii wild-type strain | Dr. Bhatt’s lab |
EL1001 | LMG20976 transformed with pEcCas, KmR | This study |
EL1101 | EL1001 transformed with pgRNA_Ealbertii, KmR ApR | This study |
EL1102 | EL1101 ΩlacZ::TAA31 (NheI) | This study |
Plasmids | ||
pEcCas | E. coli vector containing the S. pyogenes cas9 gene and tracrRNA (p15A ori; Cmr; cas9; tracrRNA) along with the lambda Red recombineering expression vector | Addgene ID #73227 |
pgRNA-bacteria | E. coli vector containing a crRNA expression cassette for Cas9 | Addgene ID #44251 |
pgRNA_Ecoli (control) | Single guide RNA targeting the E. coli lacZ gene (spacer sequence: TCGCACAGCGTGTACCACAGCGG) | This study |
pgRNA_Ealbertii | Single guide RNA targeting the E. albertii lacZ gene (spacer sequence: CAGGGTTTTCCCAGTCGCGG) | This study |
TABLE 2 Oligonucleotides used in this study | |
Oligonucleotides | Sequences |
ssDNA (E. albertii) | ATGTTTACGGATTCGCTTGCTGTTGTACTTGCCTAACGCTAGCGCGACTGGGAAAACCCTGACGTTACACAACTCAATCGCCTTACAGCG |
ssDNA (E. coli) | CTTTAACGCCGTGCGCTGTTCGCATTATCCGAACCATCCGTAGATAGGCTAGCCTGTGGTACACGCTGTGCGACCGCTACGGCCTGTATG |
Primers | |
EL251106b forward/5’ primer | GGCGAACATATTGCGTAC |
EL251106c reverse/3’ primer | CGCTCAGGTCAAAGTCAG |
EL251106a sequencing forward/5’ primer | CGTTAGAGCGATAAGC |
Plasmid DNA isolation and purification
Plasmid purification and cleanup were performed using commercial spin column kits from Zymo Research according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Preparation of recombinogenic DNA
The ssDNA oligonucleotides for recombineering experiments, a recombinogenic ssDNA oligonucleotide (E. albertii) and a nonrecombinogenic ssDNA (control), were designed through SnapGene and A plasmid Editor (ApE). An inframe stop codon (TAA) followed by an NheI restriction site was inserted into the lacZ open reading frame to facilitate the screening of successful recombinants.
Preparation of electrocompetent cells
E. albertii LMG20976 wild-type strain was streaked on LB supplemented with tetracycline (15 µg/mL). A single colony was inoculated into 5 ml of LB and incubated overnight at 37°C under shaking (180 rpm) conditions . The following day, the culture was diluted 1:100 into 40 mL LB medium, and grown under the same conditions to an OD600 of 0.4-0.6. Cells were then washed four times with ice-cold 10% glycerol and resuspended in 530 μL of ice-cold 10% glycerol. Approximately 90 μL of electrocompetent cells were aliquoted into microcentrifuge tubes. Electroporation was performed at a voltage of ~1.8 kV. After electroporation the cells were recovered in 1 mL of LB for 2 hr at 37°C (180 rpm).
CRISPR/Cas9-assisted lambda red recombineering
Recombineering was performed using a two-step sequential electroporation protocol. In the first electroporation step, wild-type E. albertii LMG20976 was transformed with 400 ng of pEcCas. Resulting transformants were then prepared for a second electroporation to introduce pgRNA (pgRNA_Ealbertii or pgRNA_Ecoli) with or without a ssDNA template. Two induction strategies were used to induce the lambda red genes on pEcCas during the preparation of electrocompetent cells: 1) a long induction (~24 h) in which cells were cultured overnight (18-20 h) at 37°C (180 rpm) in LB broth supplemented with 10 mM arabinose, subcultured (1:100) the next day into 40 mL LB containing 10 mM arabinose, and grown to an OD600 of 0.6- 0.7(4 h); and 2) a short induction (~4 h) in which arabinose was present only during the subculture growth phase. Following the induction, cells were made electrocompetent as described above.
For recombineering, using ssDNA oligonucleotide, the second electroporation step consisted of 250 ng of targeting pgRNA_Ealbertii or non-targeting pgRNA_Ecoli, mixed with approximately 2 μg of recombinogenic (E. albertii) or non-recombinogenic oligonucleotide (E. coli). Following recovery, cell cultures were diluted, and 0.1-150 µL equivalents were plated onto selective LB agar plates containing kanamycin (50 µg/mL), ampicillin (100 µg/mL) , isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (100 mM), and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (X-Gal) (10 mM). Electroporation efficiency was determined by counting the total number of colonies forming units (CFU) generated per μg of pgRNA plasmid.
Recombinant screening and verification
Recombination of lacZ ssDNA oligonucleotides was screened by colony PCR followed by NheI digestion. Briefly, a 1,478 bp fragment of lacZ was amplified by colony PCR using the primers EL251106b and EL251106c with the Taq 5X Master Mix (New England Biolabs).. The amplified PCR product was restricted with NheI to screen for successful recombinants.. The integration of the ssDNA oligonucleotide introduces an NheI restriction site; consequently, successful recombinants were identified by the cleavage of the PCR product into two distinct fragments of 996 bp and 482 bp. Recombination efficiency was measured by enumerating the number of correctly edited colonies from the pool of total viable colonies electroporated with either the recombinogenic ssDNA (E. albertii) or nonrecombinogenic ssDNA (control). The PCR product was sequenced by Sanger sequencing (Genewiz) using the primer EL251106a to confirm the precision of the CRISPR-assisted recombineering and the absence of unintended mutations at the target site.
","reagents":"","patternDescription":"Escherichia albertii is a Gram-negative bacterium that was first identified as a distinct species in 2003, having been previously misclassified as Hafnia alvei (Albert et al., 1991; Bhatt et al., 2019). It is now recognized as a significant zoonotic pathogen with a host range that includes humans, poultry, wild birds, pigs, and other animal species. Despite its clinical importance, E. albertii is frequently underreported or misidentified as diarrheagenic E. coli because they share many phenotypic and genetic traits. Retrospective multilocus sequence typing (MLST) has revealed that approximately 15% of clinical isolates, that were implicated in prior outbreaks and originally classified as enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) or enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), were actually E. albertii, highlighting the persistent challenges in diagnostic accuracy (Ooka et al., 2015).
E. albertii, EPEC, and EHEC belong to the attaching and effacing (A/E) group of bacterial pathogens. A/E pathogens are defined by the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE), a chromosomal pathogenicity island essential for the formation of A/E lesions on the intestinal epithelium (Posfai et al., 1997). Much of our knowledge on the genetic organization, regulation, and function of the LEE has been the result of studies conducted on EPEC and EHEC (Mellies et al., 2007; Wong et al, 2011; Franzin and Sircili, 2015; Bhatt et al., 2016). The LEE encodes a type III secretion system (T3SS) that directly links the cytoplasm of the bacterium with that of the host. Thereafter, the bacterium injects an assortment of effector proteins into the host cell that subvert signal transduction pathways to reorganize the host cytoskeleton that ultimately results in microvillar disintegration (effacement) and intimate bacterial adherence (attachment) to the infected cell (Gomes et al., 2020). The LEE is indispensable for the virulence of A/E bacteria, which has prompted intense investigations into understanding the molecular mechanisms that regulate this morphogenetic element in EPEC and EHEC. Research has revealed that most environmental signals regulate the LEE via the three LEE-encoded transcriptional factors - Ler, GrlR, and GrlA (Platenkamp and Mellies, 2018).
Unlike EPEC and EHEC, the molecular pathogenesis of E. albertii remains largely a mystery, with studies restricted to comparative genomic analyses These studies revealed the conservation of the LEE, including the core transcriptional factors, Ler, GrlR, and GrlA, suggesting that the bacterium harbors the genetic capability to form A/E lesions with mechanistic similarity to EPEC and EHEC (Ooka et al., 2015, Egan et al., 2016). However, for many years, functional studies were restricted in E. albertii to extrapolation based on work conducted on other A/E bacteria. This was largely due to the absence of a reliable technique for targeted mutagenesis in the bacterium. Thus, even though its potential as an emerging pathogen has been globally recognized since its initial isolation almost 35 years ago, the molecular mechanisms and environmental signals that coordinate its virulence program have yet to be fully elucidated. Furthermore, the discovery of some strains harboring potent stx2a subtype Shiga toxin genes significantly enhances the virulence potential of E. albertii, yet the regulatory mechanisms governing such traits are not fully understood (Ooka et al., 2015). Consequently, there is a critical need to develop a functional genomics platform that enables the exploration of gene function in E. albertii and lays the foundation for further research.
A significant breakthrough was achieved with the development of a modified lambda red (𝛌-Red) recombineering protocol, which enabled the first site-specific deletions of both LEE-encoded (ler, grlRA) and non-LEE-encoded genes (hfq) (Egan et al., 2016). The ability to edit genes enabled researchers to test and experimentally validate longstanding predictions on the roles of these regulatory factors in modulating gene expression from the LEE and the resulting virulence of E. albertii. Despite the success, lambda red recombineering in E. albertii is technically inefficient, locus dependent, with restrictive output, in comparison to E. coli (Egan et al., 2016). These features limit the current use and scalability of the technique. Recent studies in other enteric bacteria have highlighted the utility and scalability of using CRISPR/Cas9 and lambda red synergistically with high recombination efficiencies (Pyne et al, 2016; Su et al., 2020; Tahir et al., 2022). However, the use of CRISPR/Cas9 technology has not yet been explored in E. albertii.
The integration of CRISPR/Cas9 with the lambda red system has revolutionized genome editing in other members of the Enterobacteriaceae. Initially adapted for Escherichia coli and CRISPRStreptococcus pneumoniae (Jiang et al., 2013), this combinatorial approach overcomes the primary limitation of lambda red alone—its reliance on selectable markers and the subsequent \"scars\" left behind after marker excision. In this bipartite system, lambda red facilitates the homologous recombination of donor DNA, while CRISPR/Cas9 serves as a programmable negative selection tool that induces lethal double-strand breaks in unedited cells, effectively killing the wild-type population (Pyne et al., 2015; Reisch and Prather 2015). This coupling facilitates the rapid generation of markerless, scarless mutations with near 100% efficiency. For example, in E. coli, CRISPR-assisted systems have been successfully used to perform large-scale chromosomal deletions of up to 19.4 kb and the simultaneous insertion of up to 3 kb of heterologous DNA without the need for extensive screening (Pyne et al., 2015). 𝛌-Red-assisted recombination with CRISPR/Cas9 has recently been used to integrate a 12 kb lycopene biosynthetic pathway into the E. coli chromosome in a single step (Su et al., 2020). Furthermore, this approach has been applied to target multiple virulence factors, such as the knockout of quorum-sensing (luxS) and adhesion genes (fimH, bolA), leading to significant reduction in biofilm formation and providing a more robust framework for systematic functional genomics over traditional recombineering methods alone (Alshammari et al., 2023).
To demonstrate chromosomal gene editing in the E. albertii strain LMG20976 with CRISPR/Cas9-assisted recombineering, the nonessential lacZ gene was targeted using a two-plasmid based system (Fig. 1A). The plasmid pEcCas coexpresses Cas9 and lambda red recombinase under the control of the native cas9 promoter and the arabinose-inducible PBAD promoter (Li et al., 2020), respectively, whereas derivatives of the plasmid pgRNA-bacteria express the single guide RNA (sgRNA) of interest from the minimal synthetic promoter J231119 (Lei et al., 2013). To direct the Cas9-dependent double stranded DNA cleavage, an sgRNA complementary to the 5’ end of the lacZ ORF of E. albertii was expressed from the plasmid pgRNA_Ealbertii. The control plasmid used, pgRNA_Ecoli, expresses an sgRNA complementary to the lacZ gene from E. coli but not E. albertii. This sgRNA is not expected to introduce a dsDNA break in the native lacZ gene of E. albertii but would serve to establish a baseline for transformation and recombination without Cas9 selection. A recombinogenic single stranded oligonucleotide was designed to incorporate a premature stop codon and an NheI restriction site for verification of recombinants. By contrast, a nonrecombinogenic ssDNA oligonucleotide with homology to the E. coli lacZ gene was used as a negative control (Fig. 1A).
Following a 4-h induction of the 𝛌-Red recombinase, E. albertii cells were electroporated with the plasmid pgRNA_Ecoli, either alone or in combination with the recombinogenic ssDNA oligonucleotide, yielding transformation efficiencies of ~1 x 106 CFU/µg of plasmid DNA. In contrast, electroporation of E. albertii with the plasmid pgRNA_Ealbertii, either alone or in combination with the nonrecombinogenic (E. coli) or recombinogenic (E. albertii) oligonucleotide, resulted in a comparable 3-log reduction in transformation efficiency (Fig. 1B). This significant decrease in cell viability is attributed to lethal CRISPR/Cas9-mediated cleavage of the unmodified lacZ locus. A small fraction of pgRNA_Ealbertii transformants survived Cas9-mediated cleavage in the absence of the ssDNA template (<0.1% relative to the pgRNA_Ecoli). These escapers likely arose from spontaneous mutations within the targeting spacer of the gRNA, loss-of-function mutations affecting the expression or activity of Cas9, alternative end-joining, or random recombination events with the 𝛌-Red system (Murphy and Campellone 2003; Chayot et al., 2010; Jiang et al., 2013; Cui and Bikard, 2016; Li et al., 2023). Notably, transformation efficiencies were comparable after extending the induction period to 24 h (Fig. 1C).
A subset of the observed transformants were genotyped using colony PCR followed by NheI digestion to identify successful edits (Fig. 1D). Across three independent experiments, screening a total of 36 colonies yielded a recombination efficiency of 53%, after inducing the lambda red genes for 4 hours (Fig. 1B). Extending the induction time to 24 hours further enhanced gene editing, yielding a 1.5-fold increase in recombination efficiency to ~80% (Fig. 1C). As expected, the NheI recognition site was absent in all 36 colonies screened from the control groups. Successful incorporation of both the premature stop codon and the NheI sequence was further confirmed by DNA sequencing (Fig. 1E). The disruption of the lacZ gene and successful incorporation of both the premature stop codon and the NheI sequence was verified by Sanger sequencing (Fig. 1E) and blue-white colony screening (Fig. 1F). Taken together, these results demonstrate the adaptability of the CRISPR/Cas-assisted recombineering as an effective tool for genome editing in E. albertii.
To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the first experimental demonstration of the CRISPR/Cas9-lambda red bipartite system for targeted gene editing in E. albertii. Although recombineering-based approaches for gene editing have been used before in E. albertii, the reported recombination frequencies were exceedingly low, resulting in limited gene editing and mutant engineering (Egan et al., 2016). By contrast, the CRISPR/Cas9-lambda red bipartite system described here overcomes this technical bottleneck, which will enable researchers to modify previously unalterable genetic loci. Another advantage of our system is that it facilitates markerless gene edits, thus enabling the construction of mutants without the reliance on selectable markers.
","references":[{"reference":"Albert MJ, Alam K, Islam M, Montanaro J, Rahaman AS, Haider K, et al., Tzipori. 1991. Hafnia alvei, a probable cause of diarrhea in humans. Infection and Immunity 59: 1507-1513.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/iai.59.4.1507-1513.1991"},{"reference":"Bhatt S, Egan M, Critelli B, Kouse A, Kalman D, Upreti C. 2019. The evasive enemy: Insights into the virulence and epidemiology of the emerging attaching and effacing pathogen escherichia albertii. Infection and Immunity. 87:e00254
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/IAI.00254-18"},{"reference":"Bhatt S, Egan M, Jenkins V, Muche S, El Fenej J. 2016. The tip of the iceberg: On the roles of regulatory small RNAs in the virulence of enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 6:105.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fcimb.2016.00105"},{"reference":"Egan M, Ramirez J, Xander C, Upreti C, Bhatt S. 2016. Lambda red-mediated recombineering in the attaching and effacing pathogen Escherichia albertii. Biological Procedures Online 18:3.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s12575-015-0032-8"},{"reference":"Franzin FM, Sircili MP. 2015. Locus of enterocyte effacement: A pathogenicity island involved in the virulence of enteropathogenic and enterohemorragic escherichia coli subjected to a complex network of gene regulation. BioMed Research International 2015:534738.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1155/2015/534738"},{"reference":"Gomes TAT, Ooka T, Hernandes RT, Yamamoto D, Hayashi T. 2020. Escherichia albertii pathogenesis. EcoSal Plus 9:10.1128.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0015-2019"},{"reference":"Pósfai G, Koob MD, Kirkpatrick HA, Blattner FR. 1997. Versatile insertion plasmids for targeted genome manipulations in bacteria: isolation, deletion, and rescue of the pathogenicity island LEE of the Escherichia coli O157:H7 genome. Journal of Bacteriology 179: 4426.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Jiang W, Bikard D, Cox D, Zhang F, Marraffini LA. 2013. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nature Biotechnology 31: 233.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nbt.2508"},{"reference":"Li Q, Sun B, Chen J, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Yang S. 2021. A modified pCas/pTargetF system for CRISPR-Cas9-assisted genome editing in Escherichia coli. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica 53: 620.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/abbs/gmab036"},{"reference":"Mellies JL, Barron AMS, Carmona AM. 2007. Enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli virulence gene regulation. Infection and Immunity 75: 4199.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/IAI.01927-06"},{"reference":"Murphy KC, Campellone KG. 2003. Lambda Red-mediated recombinogenic engineering of enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic E. coli. BMC Molecular Biology 4:11.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/1471-2199-4-11"},{"reference":"Ooka T, Ogura Y, Katsura K, Seto K, Kobayashi H, Kawano K, et al., Hayashi T. 2015. Defining the genome features of Escherichia albertii, an emerging enteropathogen closely related to Escherichia coli. Genome Biology and Evolution 7: 3170.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/gbe/evv211"},{"reference":"Platenkamp A, Mellies JL. 2018. Environment controls LEE regulation in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Frontiers in Microbiology. 9:1694.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2018.01694"},{"reference":"Pyne ME, Moo-Young M, Chung DA, Chou CP. 2015. Coupling the CRISPR/Cas9 system with lambda red recombineering enables simplified chromosomal gene replacement in Escherichia coli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 81: 5103.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/AEM.01248-15"},{"reference":"Qi LS, Larson MH, Gilbert LA, Doudna JA, Weissman JS, Arkin AP, Lim WA. 2013. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-γuided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 152: 1173.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022"},{"reference":"Reisch CR, Prather KLJ. 2015. The no-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) system for genome editing in Escherichia coli. Scientific Reports 5:15096.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/srep15096"},{"reference":"Su B, Song D, Zhu H. 2020. Homology-dependent recombination of large synthetic pathways into E. coli genome via λ-Red and CRISPR/Cas9 dependent selection methodology. Microbial Cell Factories 19:108.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s12934-020-01360-x"},{"reference":"Tahir H, Basit A, Tariq H, Haider Z, Ullah A, Hayat Z, Rehman SU. 2022. Coupling CRISPR/Cas9 and lambda Red recombineering system for genome editing of Salmonella Gallinarum and the effect of ssaU knock-out mutant on the virulence of bacteria. Biomedicines 10:3028.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/biomedicines10123028"},{"reference":"Wong ARC, Pearson JS, Bright MD, Munera D, Robinson KS, Lee SF, Frankel G, Hartland EL. 2011. Enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli: even more subversive elements. Molecular Microbiology 80: 1420.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07661.x"}],"title":"Development and Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9-Assisted Recombineering in Escherichia albertii
","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Christine White-Ziegler"},"openAcknowledgement":false,"status":{"submitted":true}}],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"a04ffacc-3c7d-4b49-b76b-bd82b903b52a","decision":"accept","abstract":"Escherichia albertii is a zoonotic pathogen frequently misidentified as diarrheagenic E. coli due to shared phenotypic and genetic traits, yet functional genomic studies in this species have been limited by the inefficiency of traditional genetic tools. To address this, we developed a bipartite CRISPR/Cas9-assisted lambda red (𝛌-Red) recombineering system for efficient, markerless genome editing in E. albertii. As proof of principle, we targeted the nonessential lacZ gene for negative selection by using Cas9 to generate lethal double stranded breaks in unedited cells. Using a recombinogenic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) oligonucleotide to introduce a premature stop codon and an NheI restriction site, we achieved a recombination efficiency of 53%. Extending the induction time of the 𝛌-Red recombinase genes enhanced recombineering efficiency to 80%. This optimized CRISPR-assisted platform, the first reported application of its kind in E. albertii, enables the rapid generation of scarless mutations and provides a robust tool for the systematic analysis of E. albertii virulence factors and regulatory networks.
","acknowledgements":"","authors":[{"affiliations":["Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA, US"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["investigation","writing_reviewEditing","methodology","formalAnalysis"],"email":"sk10883114@sju.edu","firstName":"Shahab Ahmad","lastName":"Khan","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA, US"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"tm10760521@sju.edu","firstName":"Tara Marie","lastName":"Miller","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA, US"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","resources","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"sbhatt@sju.edu","firstName":"Shantanu","lastName":"Bhatt","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA, US"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","project","resources","supervision","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"eli@sju.edu","firstName":"Edwin","lastName":"Li","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0006-8621-4625"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided by SJU Summer Scholars Program, SJU John P. McNulty Program for Leadership in Science and Mathematics, and SJU Department of Biology
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/1c01cd3cbcb0b62f6b7e3396893db1f0.jpg"},"imageCaption":"CRISPR/Cas9-assisted lambda red recombination in E. albertii. (A) A two-plasmid system was used to deliver the components necessary to create a double stranded break (DSB) in the lacZ gene. Following electroporation of E. albertii LMG20976 with pEcCas and induction of the lambda red genes, cells were transformed with pgRNA_Ealbertii, encoding an sgRNA complementary to the 5’ end of the lacZ ORF of E. albertii (underlined). A pgRNA expressing a noncomplementary sgRNA, pgRNA_Ecoli, was used as a control. For recombination, a recombinogenic ssDNA oligonucleotide with a premature stop codon and an NheI restriction site was used. Electroporation and recombination efficiencies were measured in cells after (B) 4-hr or (C) 24-hr induction of lambda red genes. Electroporation efficiency was measured as the total number of colonies forming units (CFU) per microgram of pgRNA_Ecoli or pgRNA_Ealbertii. Recombination efficiency was measured as the percentage of colonies with the NheI restriction site in cells co-electroporated with a recombinogenic (E. albertii) or nonrecombinogenic (E. coli) ssDNA oligonucleotide. A total of 36 colonies (12 colonies from each independent experiment) were tested for each co-electroporation experiment. Recombination efficiencies were not determined (ND) when cells were electroporated without a ssDNA oligonucleotide. (D) Colony PCR and NheI digestion were used to identify successful recombinants. PCR amplification with EL251106b and EL251106c primers yielded a 1,478 bp product (top gel). Successful oligonucleotide recombination generated products of 996 bp and 482 bp upon NheI digestion (bottom gel). Agarose gels from a representative 12 colonies from a co-electroporation experiment with pgRNA_Ealbertii and the recombinogenic ssDNA is shown. Lane 1: ladder; lane 2: wild type E. albertii colony; lanes 7, 9, 10: escapers; lanes 3, 5, 6, 8, 11-15: recombination-positive colonies. (E) Sanger sequencing using primer EL251106a confirmed that Cas9 targeted the lacZ segment in wild type E. albertii and lambda red recombinase introduced a stop codon and an NheI restriction site (boxes). (F) Blue-white screening on X-Gal plates confirmed the successful disruption of the lacZ gene. Representative colonies are shown for all the five different pgRNA electroporation experiments. Plate 1: pgRNA_Ecoli only, blue colonies; Plate 2: pgRNA_Ecoli + recombinogenic ssDNA, blue colonies; Plate 3: pgRNA_Ealbertii only, white colonies; Plate 4: pgRNA_Ealbertii + nonrecombinogenic ssDNA, white and blue colonies; Plate 5: pgRNA_Ealbertii + recombinogenic ssDNA, white colonies.
","imageTitle":"CRISPR/Cas9-assisted lambda red recombination in E. albertii
","methods":"Bacterial strains, plasmids, primers, oligonucleotides, and growth conditions
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and oligonucleotides used in this work are listed in Tables 1 and 2. E. coli DH5α (New England Biolabs) was used to maintain and propagate the plasmid pEcCas (Addgene #73227), pgRNA-bacteria (Addgene #44251) and its derivatives. pEcCas carries the cas9, lambda red, and kanamycin resistance genes. The pgRNA-bacteria backbone was used to synthesize (Genscript) pgRNA_Ealbertii, encoding a specific sgRNA targeting the lacZ gene in E. albertii; conversely, a non-targeting control pgRNA was constructed using a spacer sequence corresponding to the E. coli lacZ gene (pgRNA_Ecoli). All the oligonucleotides were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) at the 25-nm scale using standard desalting.
Bacterial strains were first streaked onto Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates supplemented with or without antibiotics and then grown aerobically in LB broth culture tubes at 37°C and 180 rpm for ~16-20 hours. The recombinant strains carrying plasmids pEcCas and pgRNA were selected on kanamycin and ampicillin at concentrations of 50 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL, respectively.
TABLE 1 Strains and plasmids used in this study | ||
Strains | Relevant Characteristics | Source or Reference |
DH5α | E. coli F− endA1 glnV44 thi-1 recA1 relA1 gyrA96 deoR nupG ϕ80dlacZΔM15 Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169, hsdR17(rK− mK+) λ− | New England Biolabs #C2988J |
LMG20976 | E. albertii wild-type strain | Dr. Bhatt’s lab |
EL1001 | LMG20976 transformed with pEcCas, KmR | This study |
EL1101 | EL1001 transformed with pgRNA_Ealbertii, KmR ApR | This study |
EL1102 | EL1101 ΩlacZ::TAA31 (NheI) | This study |
Plasmids | ||
pEcCas | E. coli vector containing the S. pyogenes cas9 gene and tracrRNA (p15A ori; Cmr; cas9; tracrRNA) along with the lambda Red recombineering expression vector | Addgene ID #73227 |
pgRNA-bacteria | E. coli vector containing a crRNA expression cassette for Cas9 | Addgene ID #44251 |
pgRNA_Ecoli (control) | Single guide RNA targeting the E. coli lacZ gene (spacer sequence: TCGCACAGCGTGTACCACAGCGG) | This study |
pgRNA_Ealbertii | Single guide RNA targeting the E. albertii lacZ gene (spacer sequence: CAGGGTTTTCCCAGTCGCGG) | This study |
TABLE 2 Oligonucleotides used in this study | |
Oligonucleotides | Sequences |
ssDNA (E. albertii) | ATGTTTACGGATTCGCTTGCTGTTGTACTTGCCTAACGCTAGCGCGACTGGGAAAACCCTGACGTTACACAACTCAATCGCCTTACAGCG |
ssDNA (E. coli) | CTTTAACGCCGTGCGCTGTTCGCATTATCCGAACCATCCGTAGATAGGCTAGCCTGTGGTACACGCTGTGCGACCGCTACGGCCTGTATG |
Primers | |
EL251106b forward/5’ primer | GGCGAACATATTGCGTAC |
EL251106c reverse/3’ primer | CGCTCAGGTCAAAGTCAG |
EL251106a sequencing forward/5’ primer | CGTTAGAGCGATAAGC |
Plasmid DNA isolation and purification
Plasmid purification and cleanup were performed using commercial spin column kits from Zymo Research according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Preparation of recombinogenic DNA
The ssDNA oligonucleotides for recombineering experiments, a recombinogenic ssDNA oligonucleotide (E. albertii) and a nonrecombinogenic ssDNA (control, E. coli), were designed through SnapGene and A plasmid Editor (ApE). An inframe stop codon (TAA) followed by an NheI restriction site was inserted into the lacZ open reading frame to facilitate the screening of successful recombinants.
Preparation of electrocompetent cells
E. albertii LMG20976 wild-type strain was streaked on LB supplemented with tetracycline (15 µg/mL). A single colony was inoculated into 5 ml of LB and incubated overnight at 37°C under shaking (180 rpm) conditions . The following day, the culture was diluted 1:100 into 40 mL LB medium, and grown under the same conditions to an OD600 of 0.4-0.6. Cells were then washed four times with ice-cold 10% glycerol and resuspended in 530 μL of ice-cold 10% glycerol. Approximately 90 μL of electrocompetent cells were aliquoted into microcentrifuge tubes. Electroporation was performed at a voltage of ~1.8 kV. After electroporation the cells were recovered in 1 mL of LB for 2 hr at 37°C (180 rpm).
CRISPR/Cas9-assisted lambda red recombineering
Recombineering was performed using a two-step sequential electroporation protocol. In the first electroporation step, wild-type E. albertii LMG20976 was transformed with 400 ng of pEcCas. Resulting transformants were then prepared for a second electroporation to introduce pgRNA (pgRNA_Ealbertii or pgRNA_Ecoli) with or without a ssDNA template. Two induction strategies were used to induce the lambda red genes on pEcCas during the preparation of electrocompetent cells: 1) a long induction (~24 h) in which cells were cultured overnight (18-20 h) at 37°C (180 rpm) in LB broth supplemented with 10 mM arabinose, subcultured (1:50) the next day into 40 mL LB containing 10 mM arabinose, and grown to an OD600 of 0.6- 0.7 (~4 h); and 2) a short induction (~4 h) in which arabinose was present only during the subculture growth phase. Following the induction, cells were made electrocompetent as described above.
For recombineering, using ssDNA oligonucleotide, the second electroporation step consisted of 250 ng of targeting pgRNA_Ealbertii or non-targeting pgRNA_Ecoli, mixed with approximately 2 μg of recombinogenic (E. albertii) or non-recombinogenic oligonucleotide (E. coli). Following recovery, cell cultures were diluted, and 0.1-150 µL equivalents were plated onto selective LB agar plates containing kanamycin (50 µg/mL), ampicillin (100 µg/mL) , isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (100 mM), and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (X-Gal) (10 mM). Electroporation efficiency was determined by counting the total number of colonies forming units (CFU) generated per μg of pgRNA plasmid.
Recombinant screening and verification
Recombination of lacZ ssDNA oligonucleotides was screened by colony PCR followed by NheI digestion. Briefly, a 1,478 bp fragment of lacZ was amplified by colony PCR using the primers EL251106b and EL251106c with the Taq 5X Master Mix (New England Biolabs). The amplified PCR product was restricted with NheI to screen for successful recombinants. The integration of the ssDNA oligonucleotide introduces an NheI restriction site; consequently, successful recombinants were identified by the cleavage of the PCR product into two distinct fragments of 996 bp and 482 bp. Recombination efficiency was measured by enumerating the number of correctly edited colonies from the pool of total viable colonies electroporated with either the recombinogenic ssDNA (E. albertii) or nonrecombinogenic ssDNA (E. coli). The PCR product was sequenced by Sanger sequencing (Genewiz) using the primer EL251106a to confirm the precision of the CRISPR-assisted recombineering and the absence of unintended mutations at the target site.
","reagents":"","patternDescription":"Escherichia albertii is a Gram-negative bacterium that was first identified as a distinct species in 2003, having been previously misclassified as Hafnia alvei (Albert et al., 1991; Bhatt et al., 2019). It is now recognized as a significant zoonotic pathogen with a host range that includes humans, poultry, wild birds, pigs, and other animal species. Despite its clinical importance, E. albertii is frequently underreported or misidentified as diarrheagenic E. coli because they share many phenotypic and genetic traits. Retrospective multilocus sequence typing (MLST) has revealed that approximately 15% of clinical isolates, that were implicated in prior outbreaks and originally classified as enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) or enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), were actually E. albertii, highlighting the persistent challenges in diagnostic accuracy (Ooka et al., 2015).
E. albertii, EPEC, and EHEC belong to the attaching and effacing (A/E) group of bacterial pathogens. A/E pathogens are defined by the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE), a chromosomal pathogenicity island essential for the formation of A/E lesions on the intestinal epithelium (Posfai et al., 1997). Much of our knowledge on the genetic organization, regulation, and function of the LEE has been the result of studies conducted on EPEC and EHEC (Mellies et al., 2007; Wong et al, 2011; Franzin and Sircili, 2015; Bhatt et al., 2016). The LEE encodes a type III secretion system (T3SS) that directly links the cytoplasm of the bacterium with that of the host. Thereafter, the bacterium injects an assortment of effector proteins into the host cell that subvert signal transduction pathways to reorganize the host cytoskeleton that ultimately results in microvillar disintegration (effacement) and intimate bacterial adherence (attachment) to the infected cell (Gomes et al., 2020). The LEE is indispensable for the virulence of A/E bacteria, which has prompted intense investigations into understanding the molecular mechanisms that regulate this morphogenetic element in EPEC and EHEC. Research has revealed that most environmental signals regulate the LEE via the three LEE-encoded transcriptional factors - Ler, GrlR, and GrlA (Platenkamp and Mellies, 2018).
Unlike EPEC and EHEC, the molecular pathogenesis of E. albertii remains largely a mystery, with studies restricted to comparative genomic analyses These studies revealed the conservation of the LEE, including the core transcriptional factors, Ler, GrlR, and GrlA, suggesting that the bacterium harbors the genetic capability to form A/E lesions with mechanistic similarity to EPEC and EHEC (Ooka et al., 2015, Egan et al., 2016). However, for many years, functional studies were restricted in E. albertii to extrapolation based on work conducted on other A/E bacteria. This was largely due to the absence of a reliable technique for targeted mutagenesis in the bacterium. Thus, even though its potential as an emerging pathogen has been globally recognized since its initial isolation almost 35 years ago, the molecular mechanisms and environmental signals that coordinate its virulence program have yet to be fully elucidated. Furthermore, the discovery of some strains harboring potent stx2a subtype Shiga toxin genes significantly enhances the virulence potential of E. albertii, yet the regulatory mechanisms governing such traits are not fully understood (Ooka et al., 2015). Consequently, there is a critical need to develop a functional genomics platform that enables the exploration of gene function in E. albertii and lays the foundation for further research.
A significant breakthrough was achieved with the development of a modified lambda red (𝛌-Red) recombineering protocol, which enabled the first site-specific deletions of both LEE-encoded (ler, grlRA) and non-LEE-encoded genes (hfq) (Egan et al., 2016). The ability to edit genes enabled researchers to test and experimentally validate longstanding predictions on the roles of these regulatory factors in modulating gene expression from the LEE and the resulting virulence of E. albertii. Despite the success, lambda red recombineering in E. albertii is technically inefficient, locus dependent, with restrictive output, in comparison to E. coli (Egan et al., 2016). These features limit the current use and scalability of the technique. Recent studies in other enteric bacteria have highlighted the utility and scalability of using CRISPR/Cas9 and lambda red synergistically with high recombination efficiencies (Pyne et al, 2016; Su et al., 2020; Tahir et al., 2022). However, the use of CRISPR/Cas9 technology has not yet been explored in E. albertii.
The integration of CRISPR/Cas9 with the lambda red system has revolutionized genome editing in other members of the Enterobacteriaceae. Initially adapted for Escherichia coli and CRISPRStreptococcus pneumoniae (Jiang et al., 2013), this combinatorial approach overcomes the primary limitation of lambda red alone—its reliance on selectable markers and the subsequent \"scars\" left behind after marker excision. In this bipartite system, lambda red facilitates the homologous recombination of donor DNA, while CRISPR/Cas9 serves as a programmable negative selection tool that induces lethal double-strand breaks in unedited cells, effectively killing the wild-type population (Pyne et al., 2015; Reisch and Prather 2015). This coupling facilitates the rapid generation of markerless, scarless mutations with near 100% efficiency. For example, in E. coli, CRISPR-assisted systems have been successfully used to perform large-scale chromosomal deletions of up to 19.4 kb and the simultaneous insertion of up to 3 kb of heterologous DNA without the need for extensive screening (Pyne et al., 2015). 𝛌-Red-assisted recombination with CRISPR/Cas9 has recently been used to integrate a 12 kb lycopene biosynthetic pathway into the E. coli chromosome in a single step (Su et al., 2020). Furthermore, this approach has been applied to target multiple virulence factors, such as the knockout of quorum-sensing (luxS) and adhesion genes (fimH, bolA), leading to significant reduction in biofilm formation and providing a more robust framework for systematic functional genomics over traditional recombineering methods alone (Alshammari et al., 2023).
To demonstrate chromosomal gene editing in the E. albertii strain LMG20976 with CRISPR/Cas9-assisted recombineering, the nonessential lacZ gene was targeted using a two-plasmid based system (Fig. 1A). The plasmid pEcCas coexpresses Cas9 and lambda red recombinase under the control of the native cas9 promoter and the arabinose-inducible PBAD promoter (Li et al., 2020), respectively, whereas derivatives of the plasmid pgRNA-bacteria express the single guide RNA (sgRNA) of interest from the minimal synthetic promoter J231119 (Lei et al., 2013). To direct the Cas9-dependent double stranded DNA cleavage, an sgRNA complementary to the 5’ end of the lacZ ORF of E. albertii was expressed from the plasmid pgRNA_Ealbertii. The control plasmid used, pgRNA_Ecoli, expresses an sgRNA complementary to the lacZ gene from E. coli but not E. albertii. This sgRNA is not expected to introduce a dsDNA break in the native lacZ gene of E. albertii but would serve to establish a baseline for transformation and recombination without Cas9 selection. A recombinogenic single stranded oligonucleotide was designed to incorporate a premature stop codon and an NheI restriction site for verification of recombinants. By contrast, a nonrecombinogenic ssDNA oligonucleotide with homology to the E. coli lacZ gene was used as a negative control (Fig. 1A).
Following a 4-h induction of the 𝛌-Red recombinase, E. albertii cells were electroporated with the plasmid pgRNA_Ecoli, either alone or in combination with the recombinogenic ssDNA oligonucleotide, yielding transformation efficiencies of ~1 x 106 CFU/µg of plasmid DNA. In contrast, electroporation of E. albertii with the plasmid pgRNA_Ealbertii, either alone or in combination with the nonrecombinogenic (E. coli) or recombinogenic (E. albertii) oligonucleotide, resulted in a comparable 3-log reduction in transformation efficiency (Fig. 1B). This significant decrease in cell viability is attributed to lethal CRISPR/Cas9-mediated cleavage of the unmodified lacZ locus. A small fraction of pgRNA_Ealbertii transformants survived Cas9-mediated cleavage in the absence of the ssDNA template (<0.1% relative to the pgRNA_Ecoli). These escapers, also observed to a lesser extent in the presence of the ssDNA template, likely arose from spontaneous mutations within the targeting spacer of the gRNA or from loss-of-function mutations affecting the expression or activity of Cas9. Furthermore, some escapers possibly evaded death through random recombination mediated by the 𝛌-Red system or through the alternative-end joining DNA repair mechanism (Murphy and Campellone 2003; Chayot et al., 2010; Jiang et al., 2013; Cui and Bikard, 2016; Li et al., 2023). Notably, transformation efficiencies were comparable after extending the induction period to 24 h (Fig. 1C).
A subset of the observed transformants were genotyped using colony PCR followed by NheI digestion to identify successful edits (Fig. 1D). Across three independent experiments, screening a total of 36 colonies yielded a recombination efficiency of 53%, after inducing the lambda red genes for 4 hours (Fig. 1B). Extending the induction time to 24 hours further enhanced gene editing, yielding a 1.5-fold increase in recombination efficiency to ~80% (Fig. 1C). As expected, the NheI recognition site was absent in all 36 colonies screened from the control groups. Successful incorporation of both the premature stop codon and the NheI sequence was further confirmed by DNA sequencing (Fig. 1E). Additionally, blue-white screening identified transformants harboring either intended (recombinants) or random (escapers) lacZ mutations that appeared as white colonies (Fig. 1F, plates 3-5). Taken together, these results demonstrate the adaptability of the CRISPR/Cas-assisted recombineering as an effective tool for genome editing in E. albertii.
To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the first experimental demonstration of the CRISPR/Cas9-lambda red bipartite system for targeted gene editing in E. albertii. Although recombineering-based approaches for gene editing have been used before in E. albertii, the reported recombination frequencies were exceedingly low, resulting in limited gene editing and mutant engineering (Egan et al., 2016). By contrast, the CRISPR/Cas9-lambda red bipartite system described here overcomes this technical bottleneck, which will enable researchers to modify previously unalterable genetic loci. Another advantage of our system is that it facilitates markerless gene edits, thus enabling the construction of mutants without the reliance on selectable markers.
","references":[{"reference":"Albert MJ, Alam K, Islam M, Montanaro J, Rahaman AS, Haider K, et al., Tzipori. 1991. Hafnia alvei, a probable cause of diarrhea in humans. Infection and Immunity 59: 1507-1513.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/iai.59.4.1507-1513.1991"},{"reference":"Bhatt S, Egan M, Critelli B, Kouse A, Kalman D, Upreti C. 2019. The evasive enemy: Insights into the virulence and epidemiology of the emerging attaching and effacing pathogen escherichia albertii. Infection and Immunity. 87:e00254
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/IAI.00254-18"},{"reference":"Bhatt S, Egan M, Jenkins V, Muche S, El Fenej J. 2016. The tip of the iceberg: On the roles of regulatory small RNAs in the virulence of enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 6:105.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fcimb.2016.00105"},{"reference":"Egan M, Ramirez J, Xander C, Upreti C, Bhatt S. 2016. Lambda red-mediated recombineering in the attaching and effacing pathogen Escherichia albertii. Biological Procedures Online 18:3.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s12575-015-0032-8"},{"reference":"Franzin FM, Sircili MP. 2015. Locus of enterocyte effacement: A pathogenicity island involved in the virulence of enteropathogenic and enterohemorragic escherichia coli subjected to a complex network of gene regulation. BioMed Research International 2015:534738.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1155/2015/534738"},{"reference":"Gomes TAT, Ooka T, Hernandes RT, Yamamoto D, Hayashi T. 2020. Escherichia albertii pathogenesis. EcoSal Plus 9:10.1128.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0015-2019"},{"reference":"Pósfai G, Koob MD, Kirkpatrick HA, Blattner FR. 1997. Versatile insertion plasmids for targeted genome manipulations in bacteria: isolation, deletion, and rescue of the pathogenicity island LEE of the Escherichia coli O157:H7 genome. Journal of Bacteriology 179: 4426.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Jiang W, Bikard D, Cox D, Zhang F, Marraffini LA. 2013. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nature Biotechnology 31: 233.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nbt.2508"},{"reference":"Li Q, Sun B, Chen J, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Yang S. 2021. A modified pCas/pTargetF system for CRISPR-Cas9-assisted genome editing in Escherichia coli. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica 53: 620.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/abbs/gmab036"},{"reference":"Mellies JL, Barron AMS, Carmona AM. 2007. Enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli virulence gene regulation. Infection and Immunity 75: 4199.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/IAI.01927-06"},{"reference":"Murphy KC, Campellone KG. 2003. Lambda Red-mediated recombinogenic engineering of enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic E. coli. BMC Molecular Biology 4:11.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/1471-2199-4-11"},{"reference":"Ooka T, Ogura Y, Katsura K, Seto K, Kobayashi H, Kawano K, et al., Hayashi T. 2015. Defining the genome features of Escherichia albertii, an emerging enteropathogen closely related to Escherichia coli. Genome Biology and Evolution 7: 3170.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/gbe/evv211"},{"reference":"Platenkamp A, Mellies JL. 2018. Environment controls LEE regulation in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Frontiers in Microbiology. 9:1694.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2018.01694"},{"reference":"Pyne ME, Moo-Young M, Chung DA, Chou CP. 2015. Coupling the CRISPR/Cas9 system with lambda red recombineering enables simplified chromosomal gene replacement in Escherichia coli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 81: 5103.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/AEM.01248-15"},{"reference":"Qi LS, Larson MH, Gilbert LA, Doudna JA, Weissman JS, Arkin AP, Lim WA. 2013. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-γuided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 152: 1173.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022"},{"reference":"Reisch CR, Prather KLJ. 2015. The no-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) system for genome editing in Escherichia coli. Scientific Reports 5:15096.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/srep15096"},{"reference":"Su B, Song D, Zhu H. 2020. Homology-dependent recombination of large synthetic pathways into E. coli genome via λ-Red and CRISPR/Cas9 dependent selection methodology. Microbial Cell Factories 19:108.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s12934-020-01360-x"},{"reference":"Tahir H, Basit A, Tariq H, Haider Z, Ullah A, Hayat Z, Rehman SU. 2022. Coupling CRISPR/Cas9 and lambda Red recombineering system for genome editing of Salmonella Gallinarum and the effect of ssaU knock-out mutant on the virulence of bacteria. Biomedicines 10:3028.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/biomedicines10123028"},{"reference":"Wong ARC, Pearson JS, Bright MD, Munera D, Robinson KS, Lee SF, Frankel G, Hartland EL. 2011. Enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli: even more subversive elements. Molecular Microbiology 80: 1420.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07661.x"}],"title":"Development and Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9-Assisted Recombineering in Escherichia albertii
","reviews":[{"reviewer":{"displayName":"Christine White-Ziegler"},"openAcknowledgement":null,"status":{"submitted":false}}],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"06414f59-3020-45dd-96dc-375b253b7bc3","decision":"edit","abstract":"Escherichia albertii is a zoonotic pathogen frequently misidentified as diarrheagenic E. coli due to shared phenotypic and genetic traits, yet functional genomic studies in this species have been limited by the inefficiency of traditional genetic tools. To address this, we developed a bipartite CRISPR/Cas9-assisted lambda red (𝛌-Red) recombineering system for efficient, markerless genome editing in E. albertii. As proof of principle, we targeted the nonessential lacZ gene for negative selection by using Cas9 to generate lethal double stranded breaks in unedited cells. Using a recombinogenic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) oligonucleotide to introduce a premature stop codon and an NheI restriction site, we achieved a recombination efficiency of 53%. Extending the induction time of the 𝛌-Red recombinase genes enhanced recombineering efficiency to 80%. This optimized CRISPR-assisted platform, the first reported application of its kind in E. albertii, enables the rapid generation of scarless mutations and provides a robust tool for the systematic analysis of E. albertii virulence factors and regulatory networks.
","acknowledgements":"","authors":[{"affiliations":["Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA, US"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["investigation","writing_reviewEditing","methodology","formalAnalysis"],"email":"sk10883114@sju.edu","firstName":"Shahab Ahmad","lastName":"Khan","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA, US"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"tm10760521@sju.edu","firstName":"Tara Marie","lastName":"Miller","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA, US"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","resources","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"sbhatt@sju.edu","firstName":"Shantanu","lastName":"Bhatt","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA, US"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","project","resources","supervision","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"eli@sju.edu","firstName":"Edwin","lastName":"Li","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0006-8621-4625"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided by SJU Summer Scholars Program, SJU John P. McNulty Program for Leadership in Science and Mathematics, and SJU Department of Biology
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/1c01cd3cbcb0b62f6b7e3396893db1f0.jpg"},"imageCaption":"CRISPR/Cas9-assisted lambda red recombination in E. albertii. (A) A two-plasmid system was used to deliver the components necessary to create a double stranded break (DSB) in the lacZ gene. Following electroporation of E. albertii LMG20976 with pEcCas and induction of the lambda red genes, cells were transformed with pgRNA_Ealbertii, encoding an sgRNA complementary to the 5’ end of the lacZ ORF of E. albertii (underlined). A pgRNA expressing a noncomplementary sgRNA, pgRNA_Ecoli, was used as a control. For recombination, a recombinogenic ssDNA oligonucleotide with a premature stop codon and an NheI restriction site was used. Electroporation and recombination efficiencies were measured in cells after (B) 4-hr or (C) 24-hr induction of lambda red genes. Electroporation efficiency was measured as the total number of colonies forming units (CFU) per microgram of pgRNA_Ecoli or pgRNA_Ealbertii. Recombination efficiency was measured as the percentage of colonies with the NheI restriction site in cells co-electroporated with a recombinogenic (E. albertii) or nonrecombinogenic (E. coli) ssDNA oligonucleotide. A total of 36 colonies (12 colonies from each independent experiment) were tested for each co-electroporation experiment. Recombination efficiencies were not determined (ND) when cells were electroporated without a ssDNA oligonucleotide. (D) Colony PCR and NheI digestion were used to identify successful recombinants. PCR amplification with EL251106b and EL251106c primers yielded a 1,478 bp product (top gel). Successful oligonucleotide recombination generated products of 996 bp and 482 bp upon NheI digestion (bottom gel). Agarose gels from a representative 12 colonies from a co-electroporation experiment with pgRNA_Ealbertii and the recombinogenic ssDNA is shown. Lane 1: ladder; lane 2: wild type E. albertii colony; lanes 7, 9, 10: escapers; lanes 3, 5, 6, 8, 11-15: recombination-positive colonies. (E) Sanger sequencing using primer EL251106a confirmed that Cas9 targeted the lacZ segment in wild type E. albertii and lambda red recombinase introduced a stop codon and an NheI restriction site (boxes). (F) Blue-white screening on X-Gal plates confirmed the successful disruption of the lacZ gene. Representative colonies are shown for all the five different pgRNA electroporation experiments. Plate 1: pgRNA_Ecoli only, blue colonies; Plate 2: pgRNA_Ecoli + recombinogenic ssDNA, blue colonies; Plate 3: pgRNA_Ealbertii only, white colonies; Plate 4: pgRNA_Ealbertii + nonrecombinogenic ssDNA, white and blue colonies; Plate 5: pgRNA_Ealbertii + recombinogenic ssDNA, white colonies.
","imageTitle":"CRISPR/Cas9-assisted lambda red recombination in E. albertii
","methods":"Bacterial strains, plasmids, primers, oligonucleotides, and growth conditions
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and oligonucleotides used in this work are listed in Tables 1 and 2. E. coli DH5α (New England Biolabs) was used to maintain and propagate the plasmid pEcCas (Addgene #73227), pgRNA-bacteria (Addgene #44251) and its derivatives. pEcCas carries the cas9, lambda red, and kanamycin resistance genes. The pgRNA-bacteria backbone was used to synthesize (Genscript) pgRNA_Ealbertii, encoding a specific sgRNA targeting the lacZ gene in E. albertii; conversely, a non-targeting control pgRNA was constructed using a spacer sequence corresponding to the E. coli lacZ gene (pgRNA_Ecoli). All the oligonucleotides were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) at the 25-nm scale using standard desalting.
Bacterial strains were first streaked onto Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates supplemented with or without antibiotics and then grown aerobically in LB broth culture tubes at 37°C and 180 rpm for ~16-20 hours. The recombinant strains carrying plasmids pEcCas and pgRNA were selected on kanamycin and ampicillin at concentrations of 50 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL, respectively.
TABLE 1 Strains and plasmids used in this study | ||
Strains | Relevant Characteristics | Source or Reference |
DH5α | E. coli F− endA1 glnV44 thi-1 recA1 relA1 gyrA96 deoR nupG ϕ80dlacZΔM15 Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169, hsdR17(rK− mK+) λ− | New England Biolabs #C2988J |
LMG20976 | E. albertii wild-type strain | Bhatt’s lab |
EL1001 | LMG20976 transformed with pEcCas, KmR | This study |
EL1101 | EL1001 transformed with pgRNA_Ealbertii, KmR ApR | This study |
EL1102 | EL1101 ΩlacZ::TAA31 (NheI) | This study |
Plasmids | ||
pEcCas | Bacterial expression vector containing the S. pyogenes cas9 and Red recombinase genes (cas9; gam; exo; beta) | Addgene ID #73227 |
pgRNA-bacteria | Bacterial vector for the expression of a customizable guide RNA (gRNA) | Addgene ID #44251 |
pgRNA_Ecoli (control) | Single guide RNA targeting the E. coli lacZ gene (spacer sequence: TCGCACAGCGTGTACCACAGCGG) | This study |
pgRNA_Ealbertii | Single guide RNA targeting the E. albertii lacZ gene (spacer sequence: CAGGGTTTTCCCAGTCGCGG) | This study |
TABLE 2 Oligonucleotides used in this study | |
Oligonucleotides | Sequences |
ssDNA (E. albertii) | ATGTTTACGGATTCGCTTGCTGTTGTACTTGCCTAACGCTAGCGCGACTGGGAAAACCCTGACGTTACACAACTCAATCGCCTTACAGCG |
ssDNA (E. coli) | CTTTAACGCCGTGCGCTGTTCGCATTATCCGAACCATCCGTAGATAGGCTAGCCTGTGGTACACGCTGTGCGACCGCTACGGCCTGTATG |
Primers | |
EL251106b forward/5’ primer | GGCGAACATATTGCGTAC |
EL251106c reverse/3’ primer | CGCTCAGGTCAAAGTCAG |
EL251106a sequencing forward/5’ primer | CGTTAGAGCGATAAGC |
Plasmid DNA isolation and purification
Plasmid purification and cleanup were performed using commercial spin column kits from Zymo Research according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Preparation of recombinogenic DNA
The ssDNA oligonucleotides for recombineering experiments, a recombinogenic ssDNA oligonucleotide (E. albertii) and a nonrecombinogenic ssDNA (control, E. coli), were designed through SnapGene and A plasmid Editor (ApE). An inframe stop codon (TAA) followed by an NheI restriction site was inserted into the lacZ open reading frame to facilitate the screening of successful recombinants.
Preparation of electrocompetent cells
E. albertii LMG20976 wild-type strain was streaked on LB agar supplemented with tetracycline (15 µg/mL). A single colony was inoculated into 5 ml of LB and incubated overnight at 37°C under shaking (180 rpm) conditions . The following day, the culture was diluted 1:100 into 40 mL LB medium, and grown under the same conditions to an OD600 of 0.4-0.6. Cells were then washed four times with ice-cold 10% glycerol and resuspended in 530 μL of ice-cold 10% glycerol. Approximately 90 μL of electrocompetent cells were aliquoted into microcentrifuge tubes. Electroporation was performed at a voltage of ~1.8 kV. After electroporation the cells were recovered in 1 mL of LB for 2 hr at 37°C (180 rpm).
CRISPR/Cas9-assisted lambda red recombineering
Recombineering was performed using a two-step sequential electroporation protocol. In the first electroporation step, wild-type E. albertii LMG20976 was transformed with 400 ng of pEcCas. Resulting transformants were then prepared for a second electroporation to introduce pgRNA (pgRNA_Ealbertii or pgRNA_Ecoli) with or without a ssDNA template. Two induction strategies were used to induce the lambda red genes on pEcCas during the preparation of electrocompetent cells: 1) a long induction (~24 h) in which cells were cultured overnight (18-20 h) at 37°C (180 rpm) in LB broth supplemented with 10 mM arabinose, subcultured (1:50) the next day into 40 mL LB containing 10 mM arabinose, and grown to an OD600 of 0.6- 0.7 (~4 h); and 2) a short induction (~4 h) in which arabinose was present only during the subculture growth phase. Following the induction, cells were made electrocompetent as described above.
For recombineering, using ssDNA oligonucleotide, the second electroporation step consisted of 250 ng of targeting pgRNA_Ealbertii or non-targeting pgRNA_Ecoli, mixed with approximately 2 μg of recombinogenic (E. albertii) or non-recombinogenic oligonucleotide (E. coli). Following recovery, cell cultures were diluted, and 0.1-150 µL equivalents were plated onto selective LB agar plates containing kanamycin (50 µg/mL), ampicillin (100 µg/mL) , isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (100 mM), and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (X-Gal) (10 mM). Electroporation efficiency was determined by counting the total number of colonies forming units (CFU) generated per μg of pgRNA plasmid.
Recombinant screening and verification
Recombination of lacZ ssDNA oligonucleotides was screened by colony PCR followed by NheI digestion. Briefly, a 1,478 bp fragment of lacZ was amplified by colony PCR using the primers EL251106b and EL251106c with the Taq 5X Master Mix (New England Biolabs). The amplified PCR product was restricted with NheI to screen for successful recombinants. The integration of the ssDNA oligonucleotide introduces an NheI restriction site; consequently, successful recombinants were identified by the cleavage of the PCR product into two distinct fragments of 996 bp and 482 bp. Recombination efficiency was measured by enumerating the number of correctly edited colonies from the pool of total viable colonies electroporated with either the recombinogenic ssDNA (E. albertii) or nonrecombinogenic ssDNA (E. coli). The PCR product was sequenced by Sanger sequencing (Genewiz) using the primer EL251106a to confirm the precision of the CRISPR-assisted recombineering and the absence of unintended mutations at the target site.
","reagents":"","patternDescription":"Escherichia albertii is a Gram-negative bacterium that was first identified as a distinct species in 2003, having been previously misclassified as Hafnia alvei (Albert et al., 1991; Bhatt et al., 2019). It is now recognized as a significant zoonotic pathogen with a host range that includes humans, poultry, wild birds, pigs, and other animal species. Despite its clinical importance, E. albertii is frequently underreported or misidentified as diarrheagenic E. coli because they share many phenotypic and genetic traits. Retrospective multilocus sequence typing (MLST) has revealed that approximately 15% of clinical isolates, that were implicated in prior outbreaks and originally classified as enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) or enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), were actually E. albertii, highlighting the persistent challenges in diagnostic accuracy (Ooka et al., 2015).
E. albertii, EPEC, and EHEC belong to the attaching and effacing (A/E) group of bacterial pathogens. A/E pathogens are defined by the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE), a chromosomal pathogenicity island essential for the formation of A/E lesions on the intestinal epithelium (Posfai et al., 1997). Much of our knowledge on the genetic organization, regulation, and function of the LEE has been the result of studies conducted on EPEC and EHEC (Mellies et al., 2007; Wong et al, 2011; Franzin and Sircili, 2015; Bhatt et al., 2016). The LEE encodes a type III secretion system (T3SS) that directly links the cytoplasm of the bacterium with that of the host. Thereafter, the bacterium injects an assortment of effector proteins into the host cell that subvert signal transduction pathways to reorganize the host cytoskeleton that ultimately results in microvillar disintegration (effacement) and intimate bacterial adherence (attachment) to the infected cell (Gomes et al., 2020). The LEE is indispensable for the virulence of A/E bacteria, which has prompted intense investigations into understanding the molecular mechanisms that regulate this morphogenetic element in EPEC and EHEC. Research has revealed that most environmental signals regulate the LEE via the three LEE-encoded transcriptional factors - Ler, GrlR, and GrlA (Platenkamp and Mellies, 2018).
Unlike EPEC and EHEC, the molecular pathogenesis of E. albertii remains largely a mystery, with studies restricted to comparative genomic analyses These studies revealed the conservation of the LEE, including the core transcriptional factors, Ler, GrlR, and GrlA, suggesting that the bacterium harbors the genetic capability to form A/E lesions with mechanistic similarity to EPEC and EHEC (Ooka et al., 2015, Egan et al., 2016). However, for many years, functional studies were restricted in E. albertii to extrapolation based on work conducted on other A/E bacteria. This was largely due to the absence of a reliable technique for targeted mutagenesis in the bacterium. Thus, even though its potential as an emerging pathogen has been globally recognized since its initial isolation almost 35 years ago, the molecular mechanisms and environmental signals that coordinate its virulence program have yet to be fully elucidated. Furthermore, the discovery of some strains harboring potent stx2a subtype Shiga toxin genes significantly enhances the virulence potential of E. albertii, yet the regulatory mechanisms governing such traits are not fully understood (Ooka et al., 2015). Consequently, there is a critical need to develop a functional genomics platform that enables the exploration of gene function in E. albertii and lays the foundation for further research.
A significant breakthrough was achieved with the development of a modified lambda red (𝛌-Red) recombineering protocol, which enabled the first site-specific deletions of both LEE-encoded (ler, grlRA) and non-LEE-encoded genes (hfq) (Egan et al., 2016). The ability to edit genes enabled researchers to test and experimentally validate longstanding predictions on the roles of these regulatory factors in modulating gene expression from the LEE and the resulting virulence of E. albertii. Despite the success, lambda red recombineering in E. albertii is technically inefficient, locus dependent, with restrictive output, in comparison to E. coli (Egan et al., 2016). These features limit the current use and scalability of the technique. Recent studies in other enteric bacteria have highlighted the utility and scalability of using CRISPR/Cas9 and lambda red synergistically with high recombination efficiencies (Pyne et al, 2016; Su et al., 2020; Tahir et al., 2022). However, the use of CRISPR/Cas9 technology has not yet been explored in E. albertii.
The integration of CRISPR/Cas9 with the lambda red system has revolutionized genome editing in other members of the Enterobacteriaceae. Initially adapted for Escherichia coli and CRISPR Streptococcus pneumoniae (Jiang et al., 2013), this combinatorial approach overcomes the primary limitation of lambda red alone—its reliance on selectable markers and the subsequent \"scars\" left behind after marker excision. In this bipartite system, lambda red facilitates the homologous recombination of donor DNA, while CRISPR/Cas9 serves as a programmable negative selection tool that induces lethal double-strand breaks in unedited cells, effectively killing the wild-type population (Pyne et al., 2015; Reisch and Prather 2015). This coupling facilitates the rapid generation of markerless, scarless mutations with near 100% efficiency. For example, in E. coli, CRISPR-assisted systems have been successfully used to perform large-scale chromosomal deletions of up to 19.4 kb and the insertion of up to 3 kb of heterologous DNA without the need for extensive screening (Pyne et al., 2015). 𝛌-Red-assisted recombination with CRISPR/Cas9 has recently been used to integrate a 12 kb lycopene biosynthetic pathway into the E. coli chromosome in a single step (Su et al., 2020). Furthermore, this approach has been applied to target multiple virulence factors, such as the knockout of quorum-sensing (luxS) and adhesion genes (fimH, bolA), leading to significant reduction in biofilm formation and providing a more robust framework for systematic functional genomics over traditional recombineering methods alone (Alshammari et al., 2023).
To demonstrate chromosomal gene editing in the E. albertii strain LMG20976 with CRISPR/Cas9-assisted recombineering, the nonessential lacZ gene was targeted using a two-plasmid based system (Fig. 1A). The plasmid pEcCas coexpresses Cas9 and lambda red recombinase under the control of the native cas9 promoter and the arabinose-inducible PBAD promoter (Li et al., 2020), respectively, whereas derivatives of the plasmid pgRNA-bacteria express the single guide RNA (sgRNA) of interest from the minimal synthetic promoter J231119 (Lei et al., 2013). To direct the Cas9-dependent double stranded DNA cleavage, an sgRNA complementary to the 5’ end of the lacZ ORF of E. albertii was expressed from the plasmid pgRNA_Ealbertii. The control plasmid used, pgRNA_Ecoli, expresses an sgRNA complementary to the lacZ gene from E. coli but not E. albertii. This sgRNA is not expected to introduce a dsDNA break in the native lacZ gene of E. albertii but would serve to establish a baseline for transformation and recombination without Cas9 selection. A recombinogenic single stranded oligonucleotide was designed to incorporate a premature stop codon and an NheI restriction site for verification of recombinants. By contrast, a nonrecombinogenic ssDNA oligonucleotide with homology to the E. coli lacZ gene was used as a negative control (Fig. 1A).
Following a 4-h induction of the 𝛌-Red recombinase, E. albertii cells were electroporated with the plasmid pgRNA_Ecoli, either alone or in combination with the recombinogenic ssDNA oligonucleotide, yielding transformation efficiencies of ~1 x 106 CFU/µg of plasmid DNA. In contrast, electroporation of E. albertii with the plasmid pgRNA_Ealbertii, either alone or in combination with the nonrecombinogenic (E. coli) or recombinogenic (E. albertii) oligonucleotide, resulted in a comparable 3-log reduction in transformation efficiency (Fig. 1B). This significant decrease in cell viability is attributed to lethal CRISPR/Cas9-mediated cleavage of the unmodified lacZ locus. A small fraction of pgRNA_Ealbertii transformants survived Cas9-mediated cleavage in the absence of the ssDNA template (<0.1% relative to the pgRNA_Ecoli). These escapers, also observed to a lesser extent in the presence of the ssDNA template, likely arose from spontaneous mutations within the targeting spacer of the gRNA or from loss-of-function mutations affecting the expression or activity of Cas9. Furthermore, some escapers possibly evaded death through random recombination mediated by the 𝛌-Red system or through the alternative-end joining DNA repair mechanism (Murphy and Campellone 2003; Chayot et al., 2010; Jiang et al., 2013; Cui and Bikard, 2016; Li et al., 2023). Notably, transformation efficiencies were comparable after extending the induction period to 24 h (Fig. 1C).
A subset of the observed transformants were genotyped using colony PCR followed by NheI digestion to identify successful edits (Fig. 1D). Across three independent experiments, screening a total of 36 colonies yielded a recombination efficiency of 53%, after inducing the lambda red genes for 4 hours (Fig. 1B). Extending the induction time to 24 hours further enhanced gene editing, yielding a 1.5-fold increase in recombination efficiency to ~80% (Fig. 1C). As expected, the NheI recognition site was absent in all 36 colonies screened from the control groups. Successful incorporation of both the premature stop codon and the NheI sequence was further confirmed by DNA sequencing (Fig. 1E). Additionally, blue-white screening identified transformants harboring either intended (recombinants) or random (escapers) lacZ mutations that appeared as white colonies (Fig. 1F, plates 3-5). Taken together, these results demonstrate the adaptability of the CRISPR/Cas-assisted recombineering as an effective tool for genome editing in E. albertii.
To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the first experimental demonstration of the CRISPR/Cas9-lambda red bipartite system for targeted gene editing in E. albertii. Although recombineering-based approaches for gene editing have been used before in E. albertii, the reported recombination frequencies were exceedingly low, resulting in limited gene editing and mutant engineering (Egan et al., 2016). By contrast, the CRISPR/Cas9-lambda red bipartite system described here overcomes this technical bottleneck, which will enable researchers to modify previously unalterable genetic loci. Another advantage of our system is that it facilitates markerless gene edits, thus enabling the construction of mutants without the reliance on selectable markers.
","references":[{"reference":"Albert MJ, Alam K, Islam M, Montanaro J, Rahaman AS, Haider K, et al., Tzipori. 1991. Hafnia alvei, a probable cause of diarrhea in humans. Infection and Immunity 59: 1507-1513.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/iai.59.4.1507-1513.1991"},{"reference":"Bhatt S, Egan M, Critelli B, Kouse A, Kalman D, Upreti C. 2019. The evasive enemy: Insights into the virulence and epidemiology of the emerging attaching and effacing pathogen escherichia albertii. Infection and Immunity. 87:e00254
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/IAI.00254-18"},{"reference":"Bhatt S, Egan M, Jenkins V, Muche S, El Fenej J. 2016. The tip of the iceberg: On the roles of regulatory small RNAs in the virulence of enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 6:105.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fcimb.2016.00105"},{"reference":"Egan M, Ramirez J, Xander C, Upreti C, Bhatt S. 2016. Lambda red-mediated recombineering in the attaching and effacing pathogen Escherichia albertii. Biological Procedures Online 18:3.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s12575-015-0032-8"},{"reference":"Franzin FM, Sircili MP. 2015. Locus of enterocyte effacement: A pathogenicity island involved in the virulence of enteropathogenic and enterohemorragic escherichia coli subjected to a complex network of gene regulation. BioMed Research International 2015:534738.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1155/2015/534738"},{"reference":"Gomes TAT, Ooka T, Hernandes RT, Yamamoto D, Hayashi T. 2020. Escherichia albertii pathogenesis. EcoSal Plus 9:10.1128.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0015-2019"},{"reference":"Pósfai G, Koob MD, Kirkpatrick HA, Blattner FR. 1997. Versatile insertion plasmids for targeted genome manipulations in bacteria: isolation, deletion, and rescue of the pathogenicity island LEE of the Escherichia coli O157:H7 genome. Journal of Bacteriology 179: 4426.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Jiang W, Bikard D, Cox D, Zhang F, Marraffini LA. 2013. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nature Biotechnology 31: 233.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nbt.2508"},{"reference":"Li Q, Sun B, Chen J, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Yang S. 2021. A modified pCas/pTargetF system for CRISPR-Cas9-assisted genome editing in Escherichia coli. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica 53: 620.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/abbs/gmab036"},{"reference":"Mellies JL, Barron AMS, Carmona AM. 2007. Enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli virulence gene regulation. Infection and Immunity 75: 4199.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/IAI.01927-06"},{"reference":"Murphy KC, Campellone KG. 2003. Lambda Red-mediated recombinogenic engineering of enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic E. coli. BMC Molecular Biology 4:11.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/1471-2199-4-11"},{"reference":"Ooka T, Ogura Y, Katsura K, Seto K, Kobayashi H, Kawano K, et al., Hayashi T. 2015. Defining the genome features of Escherichia albertii, an emerging enteropathogen closely related to Escherichia coli. Genome Biology and Evolution 7: 3170.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/gbe/evv211"},{"reference":"Platenkamp A, Mellies JL. 2018. Environment controls LEE regulation in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Frontiers in Microbiology. 9:1694.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2018.01694"},{"reference":"Pyne ME, Moo-Young M, Chung DA, Chou CP. 2015. Coupling the CRISPR/Cas9 system with lambda red recombineering enables simplified chromosomal gene replacement in Escherichia coli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 81: 5103.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/AEM.01248-15"},{"reference":"Qi LS, Larson MH, Gilbert LA, Doudna JA, Weissman JS, Arkin AP, Lim WA. 2013. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-γuided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 152: 1173.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022"},{"reference":"Reisch CR, Prather KLJ. 2015. The no-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) system for genome editing in Escherichia coli. Scientific Reports 5:15096.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/srep15096"},{"reference":"Su B, Song D, Zhu H. 2020. Homology-dependent recombination of large synthetic pathways into E. coli genome via λ-Red and CRISPR/Cas9 dependent selection methodology. Microbial Cell Factories 19:108.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s12934-020-01360-x"},{"reference":"Tahir H, Basit A, Tariq H, Haider Z, Ullah A, Hayat Z, Rehman SU. 2022. Coupling CRISPR/Cas9 and lambda Red recombineering system for genome editing of Salmonella Gallinarum and the effect of ssaU knock-out mutant on the virulence of bacteria. Biomedicines 10:3028.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/biomedicines10123028"},{"reference":"Wong ARC, Pearson JS, Bright MD, Munera D, Robinson KS, Lee SF, Frankel G, Hartland EL. 2011. Enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli: even more subversive elements. Molecular Microbiology 80: 1420.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07661.x"}],"title":"Development and Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9-Assisted Recombineering in Escherichia albertii
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]},{"id":"01f22806-3d39-4b92-8c0c-36c5aa0693cd","decision":"publish","abstract":"Escherichia albertii is a zoonotic pathogen frequently misidentified as diarrheagenic E. coli due to shared phenotypic and genetic traits, yet functional genomic studies in this species have been limited by the inefficiency of traditional genetic tools. To address this, we developed a bipartite CRISPR/Cas9-assisted lambda red (𝛌-Red) recombineering system for efficient, markerless genome editing in E. albertii. As proof of principle, we targeted the nonessential lacZ gene for negative selection by using Cas9 to generate lethal double stranded breaks in unedited cells. Using a recombinogenic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) oligonucleotide to introduce a premature stop codon and an NheI restriction site, we achieved a recombination efficiency of 53%. Extending the induction time of the 𝛌-Red recombinase genes enhanced recombineering efficiency to 80%. This optimized CRISPR-assisted platform, the first reported application of its kind in E. albertii, enables the rapid generation of scarless mutations and provides a robust tool for the systematic analysis of E. albertii virulence factors and regulatory networks.
","acknowledgements":"","authors":[{"affiliations":["Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA, US"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["investigation","writing_reviewEditing","methodology","formalAnalysis"],"email":"sk10883114@sju.edu","firstName":"Shahab Ahmad","lastName":"Khan","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA, US"],"departments":[""],"credit":["investigation"],"email":"tm10760521@sju.edu","firstName":"Tara Marie","lastName":"Miller","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA, US"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","methodology","resources","writing_reviewEditing"],"email":"sbhatt@sju.edu","firstName":"Shantanu","lastName":"Bhatt","submittingAuthor":false,"correspondingAuthor":false,"equalContribution":true,"WBId":null,"orcid":null},{"affiliations":["Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA, US"],"departments":["Department of Biology"],"credit":["conceptualization","formalAnalysis","investigation","methodology","project","resources","supervision","writing_originalDraft"],"email":"eli@sju.edu","firstName":"Edwin","lastName":"Li","submittingAuthor":true,"correspondingAuthor":true,"equalContribution":false,"WBId":null,"orcid":"0009-0006-8621-4625"}],"awards":[],"conflictsOfInterest":"The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.
","dataTable":{"url":null},"extendedData":[],"funding":"Funding was provided by SJU Summer Scholars Program, SJU John P. McNulty Program for Leadership in Science and Mathematics, and SJU Department of Biology
","image":{"url":"https://portal.micropublication.org/uploads/1c01cd3cbcb0b62f6b7e3396893db1f0.jpg"},"imageCaption":"(A) A two-plasmid system was used to deliver the components necessary to create a double stranded break (DSB) in the lacZ gene. Following electroporation of E. albertii LMG20976 with pEcCas and induction of the lambda red genes, cells were transformed with pgRNA_Ealbertii, encoding an sgRNA complementary to the 5’ end of the lacZ ORF of E. albertii (underlined). A pgRNA expressing a noncomplementary sgRNA, pgRNA_Ecoli, was used as a control. For recombination, a recombinogenic ssDNA oligonucleotide with a premature stop codon and an NheI restriction site was used. Electroporation and recombination efficiencies were measured in cells after (B) 4-hr or (C) 24-hr induction of lambda red genes. Electroporation efficiency was measured as the total number of colonies forming units (CFU) per microgram of pgRNA_Ecoli or pgRNA_Ealbertii. Recombination efficiency was measured as the percentage of colonies with the NheI restriction site in cells co-electroporated with a recombinogenic (E. albertii) or nonrecombinogenic (E. coli) ssDNA oligonucleotide. A total of 36 colonies (12 colonies from each independent experiment) were tested for each co-electroporation experiment. Recombination efficiencies were not determined (ND) when cells were electroporated without a ssDNA oligonucleotide. (D) Colony PCR and NheI digestion were used to identify successful recombinants. PCR amplification with EL251106b and EL251106c primers yielded a 1,478 bp product (top gel). Successful oligonucleotide recombination generated products of 996 bp and 482 bp upon NheI digestion (bottom gel). Agarose gels from a representative 12 colonies from a co-electroporation experiment with pgRNA_Ealbertii and the recombinogenic ssDNA is shown. Lane 1: ladder; lane 2: wild type E. albertii colony; lanes 7, 9, 10: escapers; lanes 3, 5, 6, 8, 11-15: recombination-positive colonies. (E) Sanger sequencing using primer EL251106a confirmed that Cas9 targeted the lacZ segment in wild type E. albertii and lambda red recombinase introduced a stop codon and an NheI restriction site (boxes). (F) Blue-white screening on X-Gal plates confirmed the successful disruption of the lacZ gene. Representative colonies are shown for all the five different pgRNA electroporation experiments. Plate 1: pgRNA_Ecoli only, blue colonies; Plate 2: pgRNA_Ecoli + recombinogenic ssDNA, blue colonies; Plate 3: pgRNA_Ealbertii only, white colonies; Plate 4: pgRNA_Ealbertii + nonrecombinogenic ssDNA, white and blue colonies; Plate 5: pgRNA_Ealbertii + recombinogenic ssDNA, white colonies.
","imageTitle":"CRISPR/Cas9-assisted lambda red recombination in E. albertii
","methods":"Bacterial strains, plasmids, primers, oligonucleotides, and growth conditions
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and oligonucleotides used in this work are listed in Tables 1 and 2. E. coli DH5α (New England Biolabs) was used to maintain and propagate the plasmid pEcCas (Addgene #73227), pgRNA-bacteria (Addgene #44251) and its derivatives. pEcCas carries the cas9, lambda red, and kanamycin resistance genes. The pgRNA-bacteria backbone was used to synthesize (Genscript) pgRNA_Ealbertii, encoding a specific sgRNA targeting the lacZ gene in E. albertii; conversely, a non-targeting control pgRNA was constructed using a spacer sequence corresponding to the E. coli lacZ gene (pgRNA_Ecoli). All the oligonucleotides were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) at the 25-nm scale using standard desalting.
Bacterial strains were first streaked onto Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates supplemented with or without antibiotics and then grown aerobically in LB broth culture tubes at 37°C and 180 rpm for ~16-20 hours. The recombinant strains carrying plasmids pEcCas and pgRNA were selected on kanamycin and ampicillin at concentrations of 50 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL, respectively.
TABLE 1 Strains and plasmids used in this study | ||
Strains | Relevant Characteristics | Source or Reference |
DH5α | E. coli F− endA1 glnV44 thi-1 recA1 relA1 gyrA96 deoR nupG ϕ80dlacZΔM15 Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169, hsdR17(rK− mK+) λ− | New England Biolabs #C2988J |
LMG20976 | E. albertii wild-type strain | Bhatt’s lab |
EL1001 | LMG20976 transformed with pEcCas, KmR | This study |
EL1101 | EL1001 transformed with pgRNA_Ealbertii, KmR ApR | This study |
EL1102 | EL1101 ΩlacZ::TAA31 (NheI) | This study |
Plasmids | ||
pEcCas | Bacterial expression vector containing the S. pyogenes cas9 and Red recombinase genes (cas9; gam; exo; beta) | Addgene ID #73227 |
pgRNA-bacteria | Bacterial vector for the expression of a customizable guide RNA (gRNA) | Addgene ID #44251 |
pgRNA_Ecoli (control) | Single guide RNA targeting the E. coli lacZ gene (spacer sequence: TCGCACAGCGTGTACCACAGCGG) | This study |
pgRNA_Ealbertii | Single guide RNA targeting the E. albertii lacZ gene (spacer sequence: CAGGGTTTTCCCAGTCGCGG) | This study |
TABLE 2 Oligonucleotides used in this study | |
Oligonucleotides | Sequences |
ssDNA (E. albertii) | ATGTTTACGGATTCGCTTGCTGTTGTACTTGCCTAACGCTAGCGCGACTGGGAAAACCCTGACGTTACACAACTCAATCGCCTTACAGCG |
ssDNA (E. coli) | CTTTAACGCCGTGCGCTGTTCGCATTATCCGAACCATCCGTAGATAGGCTAGCCTGTGGTACACGCTGTGCGACCGCTACGGCCTGTATG |
Primers | |
EL251106b forward/5’ primer | GGCGAACATATTGCGTAC |
EL251106c reverse/3’ primer | CGCTCAGGTCAAAGTCAG |
EL251106a sequencing forward/5’ primer | CGTTAGAGCGATAAGC |
Plasmid DNA isolation and purification
Plasmid purification and cleanup were performed using commercial spin column kits from Zymo Research according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Preparation of recombinogenic DNA
The ssDNA oligonucleotides for recombineering experiments, a recombinogenic ssDNA oligonucleotide (E. albertii) and a nonrecombinogenic ssDNA (control, E. coli), were designed through SnapGene and A plasmid Editor (ApE). An inframe stop codon (TAA) followed by an NheI restriction site was inserted into the lacZ open reading frame to facilitate the screening of successful recombinants.
Preparation of electrocompetent cells
E. albertii LMG20976 wild-type strain was streaked on LB agar supplemented with tetracycline (15 µg/mL). A single colony was inoculated into 5 ml of LB and incubated overnight at 37°C under shaking (180 rpm) conditions . The following day, the culture was diluted 1:100 into 40 mL LB medium, and grown under the same conditions to an OD600 of 0.4-0.6. Cells were then washed four times with ice-cold 10% glycerol and resuspended in 530 μL of ice-cold 10% glycerol. Approximately 90 μL of electrocompetent cells were aliquoted into microcentrifuge tubes. Electroporation was performed at a voltage of ~1.8 kV. After electroporation the cells were recovered in 1 mL of LB for 2 hr at 37°C (180 rpm).
CRISPR/Cas9-assisted lambda red recombineering
Recombineering was performed using a two-step sequential electroporation protocol. In the first electroporation step, wild-type E. albertii LMG20976 was transformed with 400 ng of pEcCas. Resulting transformants were then prepared for a second electroporation to introduce pgRNA (pgRNA_Ealbertii or pgRNA_Ecoli) with or without a ssDNA template. Two induction strategies were used to induce the lambda red genes on pEcCas during the preparation of electrocompetent cells: 1) a long induction (~24 h) in which cells were cultured overnight (18-20 h) at 37°C (180 rpm) in LB broth supplemented with 10 mM arabinose, subcultured (1:50) the next day into 40 mL LB containing 10 mM arabinose, and grown to an OD600 of 0.6- 0.7 (~4 h); and 2) a short induction (~4 h) in which arabinose was present only during the subculture growth phase. Following the induction, cells were made electrocompetent as described above.
For recombineering, using ssDNA oligonucleotide, the second electroporation step consisted of 250 ng of targeting pgRNA_Ealbertii or non-targeting pgRNA_Ecoli, mixed with approximately 2 μg of recombinogenic (E. albertii) or non-recombinogenic oligonucleotide (E. coli). Following recovery, cell cultures were diluted, and 0.1-150 µL equivalents were plated onto selective LB agar plates containing kanamycin (50 µg/mL), ampicillin (100 µg/mL) , isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (100 mM), and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (X-Gal) (10 mM). Electroporation efficiency was determined by counting the total number of colonies forming units (CFU) generated per μg of pgRNA plasmid.
Recombinant screening and verification
Recombination of lacZ ssDNA oligonucleotides was screened by colony PCR followed by NheI digestion. Briefly, a 1,478 bp fragment of lacZ was amplified by colony PCR using the primers EL251106b and EL251106c with the Taq 5X Master Mix (New England Biolabs). The amplified PCR product was restricted with NheI to screen for successful recombinants. The integration of the ssDNA oligonucleotide introduces an NheI restriction site; consequently, successful recombinants were identified by the cleavage of the PCR product into two distinct fragments of 996 bp and 482 bp. Recombination efficiency was measured by enumerating the number of correctly edited colonies from the pool of total viable colonies electroporated with either the recombinogenic ssDNA (E. albertii) or nonrecombinogenic ssDNA (E. coli). The PCR product was sequenced by Sanger sequencing (Genewiz) using the primer EL251106a to confirm the precision of the CRISPR-assisted recombineering and the absence of unintended mutations at the target site.
","reagents":"","patternDescription":"Escherichia albertii is a Gram-negative bacterium that was first identified as a distinct species in 2003, having been previously misclassified as Hafnia alvei (Albert et al., 1991; Bhatt et al., 2019). It is now recognized as a significant zoonotic pathogen with a host range that includes humans, poultry, wild birds, pigs, and other animal species. Despite its clinical importance, E. albertii is frequently underreported or misidentified as diarrheagenic E. coli because they share many phenotypic and genetic traits. Retrospective multilocus sequence typing (MLST) has revealed that approximately 15% of clinical isolates, that were implicated in prior outbreaks and originally classified as enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) or enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), were actually E. albertii, highlighting the persistent challenges in diagnostic accuracy (Ooka et al., 2015).
E. albertii, EPEC, and EHEC belong to the attaching and effacing (A/E) group of bacterial pathogens. A/E pathogens are defined by the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE), a chromosomal pathogenicity island essential for the formation of A/E lesions on the intestinal epithelium (Posfai et al., 1997). Much of our knowledge on the genetic organization, regulation, and function of the LEE has been the result of studies conducted on EPEC and EHEC (Mellies et al., 2007; Wong et al, 2011; Franzin and Sircili, 2015; Bhatt et al., 2016). The LEE encodes a type III secretion system (T3SS) that directly links the cytoplasm of the bacterium with that of the host. Thereafter, the bacterium injects an assortment of effector proteins into the host cell that subvert signal transduction pathways to reorganize the host cytoskeleton that ultimately results in microvillar disintegration (effacement) and intimate bacterial adherence (attachment) to the infected cell (Gomes et al., 2020). The LEE is indispensable for the virulence of A/E bacteria, which has prompted intense investigations into understanding the molecular mechanisms that regulate this morphogenetic element in EPEC and EHEC. Research has revealed that most environmental signals regulate the LEE via the three LEE-encoded transcriptional factors - Ler, GrlR, and GrlA (Platenkamp and Mellies, 2018).
Unlike EPEC and EHEC, the molecular pathogenesis of E. albertii remains largely a mystery, with studies restricted to comparative genomic analyses These studies revealed the conservation of the LEE, including the core transcriptional factors, Ler, GrlR, and GrlA, suggesting that the bacterium harbors the genetic capability to form A/E lesions with mechanistic similarity to EPEC and EHEC (Ooka et al., 2015, Egan et al., 2016). However, for many years, functional studies were restricted in E. albertii to extrapolation based on work conducted on other A/E bacteria. This was largely due to the absence of a reliable technique for targeted mutagenesis in the bacterium. Thus, even though its potential as an emerging pathogen has been globally recognized since its initial isolation almost 35 years ago, the molecular mechanisms and environmental signals that coordinate its virulence program have yet to be fully elucidated. Furthermore, the discovery of some strains harboring potent stx2a subtype Shiga toxin genes significantly enhances the virulence potential of E. albertii, yet the regulatory mechanisms governing such traits are not fully understood (Ooka et al., 2015). Consequently, there is a critical need to develop a functional genomics platform that enables the exploration of gene function in E. albertii and lays the foundation for further research.
A significant breakthrough was achieved with the development of a modified lambda red (𝛌-Red) recombineering protocol, which enabled the first site-specific deletions of both LEE-encoded (ler, grlRA) and non-LEE-encoded genes (hfq) (Egan et al., 2016). The ability to edit genes enabled researchers to test and experimentally validate longstanding predictions on the roles of these regulatory factors in modulating gene expression from the LEE and the resulting virulence of E. albertii. Despite the success, lambda red recombineering in E. albertii is technically inefficient, locus dependent, with restrictive output, in comparison to E. coli (Egan et al., 2016). These features limit the current use and scalability of the technique. Recent studies in other enteric bacteria have highlighted the utility and scalability of using CRISPR/Cas9 and lambda red synergistically with high recombination efficiencies (Pyne et al, 2016; Su et al., 2020; Tahir et al., 2022). However, the use of CRISPR/Cas9 technology has not yet been explored in E. albertii.
The integration of CRISPR/Cas9 with the lambda red system has revolutionized genome editing in other members of the Enterobacteriaceae. Initially adapted for Escherichia coli and CRISPR Streptococcus pneumoniae (Jiang et al., 2013), this combinatorial approach overcomes the primary limitation of lambda red alone—its reliance on selectable markers and the subsequent \"scars\" left behind after marker excision. In this bipartite system, lambda red facilitates the homologous recombination of donor DNA, while CRISPR/Cas9 serves as a programmable negative selection tool that induces lethal double-strand breaks in unedited cells, effectively killing the wild-type population (Pyne et al., 2015; Reisch and Prather 2015). This coupling facilitates the rapid generation of markerless, scarless mutations with near 100% efficiency. For example, in E. coli, CRISPR-assisted systems have been successfully used to perform large-scale chromosomal deletions of up to 19.4 kb and the insertion of up to 3 kb of heterologous DNA without the need for extensive screening (Pyne et al., 2015). 𝛌-Red-assisted recombination with CRISPR/Cas9 has recently been used to integrate a 12 kb lycopene biosynthetic pathway into the E. coli chromosome in a single step (Su et al., 2020). Furthermore, this approach has been applied to target multiple virulence factors, such as the knockout of quorum-sensing (luxS) and adhesion genes (fimH, bolA), leading to significant reduction in biofilm formation and providing a more robust framework for systematic functional genomics over traditional recombineering methods alone (Alshammari et al., 2023).
To demonstrate chromosomal gene editing in the E. albertii strain LMG20976 with CRISPR/Cas9-assisted recombineering, the nonessential lacZ gene was targeted using a two-plasmid based system (Fig. 1A). The plasmid pEcCas coexpresses Cas9 and lambda red recombinase under the control of the native cas9 promoter and the arabinose-inducible PBAD promoter (Li et al., 2020), respectively, whereas derivatives of the plasmid pgRNA-bacteria express the single guide RNA (sgRNA) of interest from the minimal synthetic promoter J231119 (Lei et al., 2013). To direct the Cas9-dependent double stranded DNA cleavage, an sgRNA complementary to the 5’ end of the lacZ ORF of E. albertii was expressed from the plasmid pgRNA_Ealbertii. The control plasmid used, pgRNA_Ecoli, expresses an sgRNA complementary to the lacZ gene from E. coli but not E. albertii. This sgRNA is not expected to introduce a dsDNA break in the native lacZ gene of E. albertii but would serve to establish a baseline for transformation and recombination without Cas9 selection. A recombinogenic single stranded oligonucleotide was designed to incorporate a premature stop codon and an NheI restriction site for verification of recombinants. By contrast, a nonrecombinogenic ssDNA oligonucleotide with homology to the E. coli lacZ gene was used as a negative control (Fig. 1A).
Following a 4-h induction of the 𝛌-Red recombinase, E. albertii cells were electroporated with the plasmid pgRNA_Ecoli, either alone or in combination with the recombinogenic ssDNA oligonucleotide, yielding transformation efficiencies of ~1 x 106 CFU/µg of plasmid DNA. In contrast, electroporation of E. albertii with the plasmid pgRNA_Ealbertii, either alone or in combination with the nonrecombinogenic (E. coli) or recombinogenic (E. albertii) oligonucleotide, resulted in a comparable 3-log reduction in transformation efficiency (Fig. 1B). This significant decrease in cell viability is attributed to lethal CRISPR/Cas9-mediated cleavage of the unmodified lacZ locus. A small fraction of pgRNA_Ealbertii transformants survived Cas9-mediated cleavage in the absence of the ssDNA template (<0.1% relative to the pgRNA_Ecoli). These escapers, also observed to a lesser extent in the presence of the ssDNA template, likely arose from spontaneous mutations within the targeting spacer of the gRNA or from loss-of-function mutations affecting the expression or activity of Cas9. Furthermore, some escapers possibly evaded death through random recombination mediated by the 𝛌-Red system or through the alternative-end joining DNA repair mechanism (Murphy and Campellone 2003; Chayot et al., 2010; Jiang et al., 2013; Cui and Bikard, 2016; Li et al., 2023). Notably, transformation efficiencies were comparable after extending the induction period to 24 h (Fig. 1C).
A subset of the observed transformants were genotyped using colony PCR followed by NheI digestion to identify successful edits (Fig. 1D). Across three independent experiments, screening a total of 36 colonies yielded a recombination efficiency of 53%, after inducing the lambda red genes for 4 hours (Fig. 1B). Extending the induction time to 24 hours further enhanced gene editing, yielding a 1.5-fold increase in recombination efficiency to ~80% (Fig. 1C). As expected, the NheI recognition site was absent in all 36 colonies screened from the control groups. Successful incorporation of both the premature stop codon and the NheI sequence was further confirmed by DNA sequencing (Fig. 1E). Additionally, blue-white screening identified transformants harboring either intended (recombinants) or random (escapers) lacZ mutations that appeared as white colonies (Fig. 1F, plates 3-5). Taken together, these results demonstrate the adaptability of the CRISPR/Cas-assisted recombineering as an effective tool for genome editing in E. albertii.
To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the first experimental demonstration of the CRISPR/Cas9-lambda red bipartite system for targeted gene editing in E. albertii. Although recombineering-based approaches for gene editing have been used before in E. albertii, the reported recombination frequencies were exceedingly low, resulting in limited gene editing and mutant engineering (Egan et al., 2016). By contrast, the CRISPR/Cas9-lambda red bipartite system described here overcomes this technical bottleneck, which will enable researchers to modify previously unalterable genetic loci. Another advantage of our system is that it facilitates markerless gene edits, thus enabling the construction of mutants without the reliance on selectable markers.
","references":[{"reference":"Albert MJ, Alam K, Islam M, Montanaro J, Rahaman AS, Haider K, et al., Tzipori. 1991. Hafnia alvei, a probable cause of diarrhea in humans. Infection and Immunity 59: 1507-1513.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/iai.59.4.1507-1513.1991"},{"reference":"Bhatt S, Egan M, Critelli B, Kouse A, Kalman D, Upreti C. 2019. The evasive enemy: Insights into the virulence and epidemiology of the emerging attaching and effacing pathogen escherichia albertii. Infection and Immunity. 87:e00254
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/IAI.00254-18"},{"reference":"Bhatt S, Egan M, Jenkins V, Muche S, El Fenej J. 2016. The tip of the iceberg: On the roles of regulatory small RNAs in the virulence of enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 6:105.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fcimb.2016.00105"},{"reference":"Egan M, Ramirez J, Xander C, Upreti C, Bhatt S. 2016. Lambda red-mediated recombineering in the attaching and effacing pathogen Escherichia albertii. Biological Procedures Online 18:3.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s12575-015-0032-8"},{"reference":"Franzin FM, Sircili MP. 2015. Locus of enterocyte effacement: A pathogenicity island involved in the virulence of enteropathogenic and enterohemorragic escherichia coli subjected to a complex network of gene regulation. BioMed Research International 2015:534738.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1155/2015/534738"},{"reference":"Gomes TAT, Ooka T, Hernandes RT, Yamamoto D, Hayashi T. 2020. Escherichia albertii pathogenesis. EcoSal Plus 9:10.1128.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0015-2019"},{"reference":"Pósfai G, Koob MD, Kirkpatrick HA, Blattner FR. 1997. Versatile insertion plasmids for targeted genome manipulations in bacteria: isolation, deletion, and rescue of the pathogenicity island LEE of the Escherichia coli O157:H7 genome. Journal of Bacteriology 179: 4426.
","pubmedId":"","doi":""},{"reference":"Jiang W, Bikard D, Cox D, Zhang F, Marraffini LA. 2013. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nature Biotechnology 31: 233.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/nbt.2508"},{"reference":"Li Q, Sun B, Chen J, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Yang S. 2021. A modified pCas/pTargetF system for CRISPR-Cas9-assisted genome editing in Escherichia coli. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica 53: 620.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/abbs/gmab036"},{"reference":"Mellies JL, Barron AMS, Carmona AM. 2007. Enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli virulence gene regulation. Infection and Immunity 75: 4199.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/IAI.01927-06"},{"reference":"Murphy KC, Campellone KG. 2003. Lambda Red-mediated recombinogenic engineering of enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic E. coli. BMC Molecular Biology 4:11.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/1471-2199-4-11"},{"reference":"Ooka T, Ogura Y, Katsura K, Seto K, Kobayashi H, Kawano K, et al., Hayashi T. 2015. Defining the genome features of Escherichia albertii, an emerging enteropathogen closely related to Escherichia coli. Genome Biology and Evolution 7: 3170.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1093/gbe/evv211"},{"reference":"Platenkamp A, Mellies JL. 2018. Environment controls LEE regulation in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Frontiers in Microbiology. 9:1694.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2018.01694"},{"reference":"Pyne ME, Moo-Young M, Chung DA, Chou CP. 2015. Coupling the CRISPR/Cas9 system with lambda red recombineering enables simplified chromosomal gene replacement in Escherichia coli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 81: 5103.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1128/AEM.01248-15"},{"reference":"Qi LS, Larson MH, Gilbert LA, Doudna JA, Weissman JS, Arkin AP, Lim WA. 2013. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-γuided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 152: 1173.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022"},{"reference":"Reisch CR, Prather KLJ. 2015. The no-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) system for genome editing in Escherichia coli. Scientific Reports 5:15096.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1038/srep15096"},{"reference":"Su B, Song D, Zhu H. 2020. Homology-dependent recombination of large synthetic pathways into E. coli genome via λ-Red and CRISPR/Cas9 dependent selection methodology. Microbial Cell Factories 19:108.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1186/s12934-020-01360-x"},{"reference":"Tahir H, Basit A, Tariq H, Haider Z, Ullah A, Hayat Z, Rehman SU. 2022. Coupling CRISPR/Cas9 and lambda Red recombineering system for genome editing of Salmonella Gallinarum and the effect of ssaU knock-out mutant on the virulence of bacteria. Biomedicines 10:3028.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.3390/biomedicines10123028"},{"reference":"Wong ARC, Pearson JS, Bright MD, Munera D, Robinson KS, Lee SF, Frankel G, Hartland EL. 2011. Enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli: even more subversive elements. Molecular Microbiology 80: 1420.
","pubmedId":"","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07661.x"}],"title":"Development and Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9-Assisted Recombineering in Escherichia albertii
","reviews":[],"curatorReviews":[]}]}},"species":{"species":[{"value":"acer saccharum","label":"Acer saccharum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"TreeGenes","modLink":"https://treegenesdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"achillea millefolium","label":"Achillea millefolium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"acinetobacter baylyi","label":"Acinetobacter baylyi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"actinobacteria bacterium","label":"Actinobacteria bacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adelges tsugae","label":"Adelges tsugae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"adenocaulon chilense","label":"Adenocaulon chilense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aedes japonicus","label":"Aedes japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aegorhinus vitulus","label":"Aegorhinus vitulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alaimidae","label":"Alaimidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"allobates femoralis","label":"Allobates femoralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alnus glutinosa","label":"Alnus glutinosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa aestivalis","label":"Alosa aestivalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alosa pseudoharengus","label":"Alosa pseudoharengus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"alternaria alternata","label":"Alternaria alternata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"amynthas agrestis","label":"Amynthas Agrestis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma caninum","label":"Ancylostoma caninum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ancylostoma ceylanicum","label":"Ancylostoma ceylanicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anemone multifida","label":"Anemone multifida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anguilla rostrata","label":"Anguilla rostrata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anisakis simplex","label":"Anisakis simplex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anomala albopilosa","label":"Anomala albopilosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"anthomyiidae sp","label":"Anthomyiidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arabidopsis","label":"Arabidopsis","imageSrc":"arabidopsis.png","imageAlt":"Arabidopsis graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"TAIR","modLink":"https://arabidopsis.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"architeuthis dux","label":"Architeuthis dux","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arion vulgaris","label":"Arion vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"armeria","label":"Armeria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"artemia","label":"Artemia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"arthrobacter sp.","label":"Arthrobacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia","label":"Ascaridia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ascaridia galli","label":"Ascaridia galli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"asparagopsis taxiformis","label":"Asparagopsis taxiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"astatotilapia burtoni","label":"Astatotilapia burtoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"avena sativa","label":"Avena sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"aves","label":"Aves","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus","label":"Bacillus (firmicutes)","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus cereus","label":"Bacillus cereus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus mycoides","label":"Bacillus mycoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus subtilis","label":"Bacillus subtilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus thuringiensis","label":"Bacillus thuringiensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus toyonensis","label":"Bacillus toyonensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacillus wiedmannii","label":"Bacillus wiedmannii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteria","label":"Bacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bacteriophage","label":"Bacteriophage","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bactrocera","label":"Bactrocera sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"batrachospermum gelatinosum","label":"Batrachospermum gelatinosum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula lenta","label":"Betula lenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"betula nigra","label":"Betula nigra","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus dahlbohmii","label":"Bombus dahlbohmii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombus terrestris","label":"Bombus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bombyx mori","label":"Bombyx mori","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bos taurus","label":"Bos Taurus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brachygobius doriae","label":"Brachygobius doriae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica oleracea","label":"Brassica oleracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brassica rapa","label":"Brassica rapa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"brugia malayi","label":"Brugia malayi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"burkholderia thailandensis","label":"Burkholderia thailandensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"buttiauxella","label":"Buttiauxella","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis brenneri","label":"Caenorhabditis brenneri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis briggsae","label":"Caenorhabditis briggsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"c. elegans","label":"Caenorhabditis elegans","imageSrc":"c-elegans.jpg","imageAlt":"C. elegans graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis inopinata","label":"Caenorhabditis inopinata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis japonica","label":"Caenorhabditis japonica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis nigoni","label":"Caenorhabditis nigoni","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis remanei","label":"Caenorhabditis remanei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caenorhabditis tropicalis","label":"Caenorhabditis tropicalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus","label":"Calidifontibacillus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","label":"Calidifontibacillus erzuremensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"calliphora sp","label":"Calliphora sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caltha sagittata","label":"Caltha sagittata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cambarus latimanus","label":"Cambarus latimanus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"candida albicans","label":"Candida albicans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"canis familiaris","label":"Canis familiaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cannabis sativa","label":"Cannabis sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caretta caretta","label":"Caretta caretta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cassiopea xamachana","label":"Cassiopea xamachana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"caulobacter vibrioides","label":"Caulobacter vibrioides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cephalopods","label":"Cephalopoda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cerastium arvense","label":"Cerastium arvense","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceriodaphnia","label":"Ceriodaphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ceroglossus suturalis","label":"Ceroglossus suturalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chaetoceros","label":"Chaetoceros","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chamaecrista fasciculata","label":"Chamaecrista fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chilicola chalcidiformis","label":"Chilicola chalcidiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chitinimonas","label":"Chitinimonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chlamydomonas reinhardtii","label":"Chlamydomonas reinhardtii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chromobacterium","label":"Chromobacterium","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysemys picta","label":"Chrysemys picta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"chrysoperla rufilabris","label":"Chrysoperla rufilabris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"citrus","label":"Citrus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"clavibacter sp.","label":"Clavibacter sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"colinus virginianus","label":"Colinus virginianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crassostrea virginica","label":"Crassostrea virginica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"crithidia fasciculata","label":"Crithidia fasciculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cutibacterium acnes","label":"Cutibacterium acnes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"cyanobacteria","label":"Cyanobacteria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia","label":"Daphnia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"daphnia pulex","label":"Daphnia pulex","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera","label":"Diabrotica virgifera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","label":"Diabrotica virgifera virgifera virus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"d. discoideum","label":"Dictyostelium discoideum","imageSrc":"dicty.png","imageAlt":"D. discoideum","mod":"dictyBase","modLink":"http://dictybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"diptera","label":"Diptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dotocryptus bellicosus","label":"Dotocryptus bellicosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drechmeria coniospora","label":"Drechmeria coniospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"drosophila","label":"Drosophila","imageSrc":"drosophila.png","imageAlt":"Drosophila graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"FlyBase","modLink":"https://flybase.org/doi/","linkVariable":"doi"},{"value":"dryopteris campyloptera","label":"Dryopteris campyloptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris expansa","label":"Dryopteris expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dryopteris intermedia","label":"Dryopteris intermedia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"dugesia dorotocephala","label":"Dugesia dorotocephala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"elasmobranchii","label":"Elasmobranchii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"embryophyta","label":"Embryophyta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enoploteuthis chunii","label":"Enoploteuthis chunii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterobacter aerogenes","label":"Enterobacter aerogenes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"enterococcus raffinosus","label":"Enterococcus raffinosus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"epichloë coenophiala","label":"Epichloë coenophiala","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"equus caballus","label":"Equus caballus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erigeron sp","label":"Erigeron sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eristalis","label":"Eristalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eruca vesicaria","label":"Eruca vesicaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erwinia carotovora","label":"Erwinia carotovora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"erythronium americanum","label":"Erythronium americanum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"escherichia coli","label":"Escherichia coli","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"eukaryota","label":"Eukaryotes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"felis catus","label":"Felis catus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella novicida","label":"Francisella novicida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"francisella tularensis","label":"Francisella tularensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fraxinus americana","label":"Fraxinus americana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fucus distichus","label":"Fucus distichus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"fungi","label":"Fungi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gasteropelecus sp.","label":"Gasteropelecus sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"geranium sp","label":"Geranium sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"girardia","label":"Girardia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glaucomys volans","label":"Glaucomys volans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glycine max","label":"Glycine max","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Soybase","modLink":"https://soybase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"glyptemys insculpta","label":"Glyptemys insculpta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gossypium hirsutum","label":"Gossypium hirsutum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"CottonGen","modLink":"https://www.cottongen.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gromphadorhina portentosa","label":"Gromphadorhina portentosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"gryllodes sigillatus","label":"Gryllodes sigillatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"haliotis rufescens","label":"Haliotis rufescens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hepacivirus hominis","label":"Hepatitis C Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"herpes simplex virus type 1","label":"Herpes simplex virus type 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human","label":"Human","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"human coronavirus oc43","label":"Human coronavirus OC43","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydra vulgaris","label":"Hydra vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hydropsyche sp","label":"Hydropsyche sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hymenoptera","label":"Hymenoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Hymenoptera Genome Database","modLink":"https://hymenoptera.elsiklab.missouri.edu/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypochaeris radicata","label":"Hypochaeris radicata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"hypodynerus vespiformis","label":"Hypodynerus vespiformis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflaviridae","label":"Iflaviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"iflavuris","label":"Iflavirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ipomoea hederacea","label":"Ipomoea hederacea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera","label":"Ischnomera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ischnomera ruficollis","label":"Ischnomera ruficollis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"julidochromis marlieri","label":"Julidochromis marlieri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"juniperus virginiana","label":"Juniperus virginiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"kluyveromyces marxianus","label":"Kluyveromyces marxianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"l. casei","label":"L. casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lacticaseibacillus casei","label":"Lacticaseibacillus casei","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"larentiinae sp","label":"Larentiinae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"laurus nobilis","label":"Laurus nobilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lepidoptera","label":"Lepidoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"leucanthemum vulgare","label":"Leucanthemum vulgare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"linepithema humile","label":"Linepithema humile","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"liometopum occidentale","label":"Liometopum occidentale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lolium arundinaceum","label":"Lolium arundinaceum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbriculus variegatus","label":"Lumbriculus variegatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lumbricus terrestris","label":"Lumbricus terrestris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lupinus polyphyllus","label":"Lupinus polyphyllus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lycorma delicatula","label":"Lycorma delicatula","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"lynx rufus","label":"Lynx rufus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"magnaporthe oryzae","label":"Magnaporthe oryzae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mammalia","label":"Mammalia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"manihot esculenta","label":"Manihot esculenta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"medicago lupulina","label":"Medicago lupulina","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"meloidogyne","label":"Meloidogyne","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mimus polyglottos","label":"Mimus polyglottos","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"bryophyta","label":"Mosses","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mouse","label":"Mouse","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MGI","modLink":"https://informatics.jax.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"m. minutoides","label":"Mus minutoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"mycobacterium smegmatis","label":"Mycobacterium smegmatis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nakaseomyces glabratus","label":"Nakaseomyces glabratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nauphoeta cinerea","label":"Nauphoeta cinerea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"neurospora","label":"Neurospora","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"n. benthamiana","label":"Nicotiana benthamiana","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/Nicotiana_benthamiana/genome","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nicotiana tabacum","label":"Nicotiana tabacum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae","label":"Noctuidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"noctuidae sp","label":"Noctuidae sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"nothobranchius furzeri","label":"Nothobranchius furzeri","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"onchocerca volvulus","label":"Onchocerca volvulus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"orconectes virilis","label":"Orconectes virilis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ormia ochracea","label":"Ormia ochracea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"o. sativa","label":"Oryza sativa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Gramene","modLink":"https://www.gramene.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"other","label":"Other","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"oxalis enneaphylla","label":"Oxalis enneaphylla","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","label":"Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea","label":"Pantoea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pantoea agglomerans","label":"Pantoea agglomerans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"papaver sp","label":"Papaver sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"paramecium bursaria","label":"Paramecium bursaria","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"partitiviridae","label":"Partitiviridae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pelodiscus sinensis","label":"Pelodiscus sinensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"perezia recurvata","label":"Perezia recurvata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"petromyzon marinus","label":"Petromyzon marinus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis","label":"Photinus pyralis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","label":"Photinus pyralis associated partiti-like virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","label":"Photinus pyralis iflavirus 1","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"physcomitrium patens","label":"Physcomitrium patens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus strobus","label":"Pinus strobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pinus taeda","label":"Pinus taeda","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"platycheirus","label":"Platycheirus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"plectus sambesii","label":"Plectus sambesii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pogonomyrmex occidentalis","label":"Pogonomyrmex occidentalis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"poncirus trifoliata","label":"Poncirus trifoliata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"populus deltoides","label":"Populus deltoides","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"potato virus y","label":"Potato virus Y","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"primula magellanica","label":"Primula magellanica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pristionchus pacificus","label":"Pristionchus pacificus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"prunus persica","label":"Prunus persica","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Genome Database for Rosaceae","modLink":"https://www.rosaceae.org/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"psalmopoeus iriminia","label":"Psalmopoeus iriminia","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudanabaena sp.","label":"Pseudanabaena sp.","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas","label":"Pseudomonas","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas aeruginosa","label":"Pseudomonas aeruginosa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas glycinae","label":"Pseudomonas glycinae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas putida","label":"Pseudomonas putida","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pseudomonas syringae","label":"Pseudomonas syringae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"pterophyllum scalare","label":"Pterophyllum scalare","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"python regius","label":"Python regius","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"quercus macrocarpa","label":"Quercus macrocarpa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ralstonia solanacearum","label":"Ralstonia solanacearum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranitomeya imitator","label":"Ranitomeya imitator","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ranunculus peduncularis","label":"Ranunculus peduncularis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rat","label":"Rat","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"RGD","modLink":"https://rgd.mcw.edu","linkVariable":""},{"value":"rheinheimera","label":"Rheinheimera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ribes rubrum","label":"Ribes rubrum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sars-cov-2","label":"SARS-CoV-2","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. cerevisiae","label":"Saccharomyces cerevisiae","imageSrc":"yeast.png","imageAlt":"Yeast graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"SGD","modLink":"https://yeastgenome.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"saccharomyces paradoxus","label":"Saccharomyces paradoxus ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. uvarum","label":"Saccharomyces uvarum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schistosoma","label":"Schistosoma","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"schizosaccharomyces japonicus","label":"Schizosaccharomyces japonicus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. pombe","label":"Schizosaccharomyces pombe","imageSrc":"pombe.png","imageAlt":"Pombe graphic by Zoe Zorn © Caltech","mod":"PomBase","modLink":"https://www.pombase.org/reference/PMID:","linkVariable":"pmId"},{"value":"schmidtea mediterranea","label":"Schmidtea mediterranea","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"senecio sp","label":"Senecio sp","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"simocephalus","label":"Simocephalus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"siraitia grosvenorii","label":"Siraitia grosvenorii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"solanum lycopersicum","label":"Solanum lycopersicum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Solgenomics Network","modLink":"https://solgenomics.net/organism/1/view/","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sorghum","label":"Sorghum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"SorghumBase","modLink":"https://www.sorghumbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"spiroplasma eriocheiris","label":"Spiroplasma eriocheiris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus aureus","label":"Staphylococcus aureus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"staphylococcus epidermidis","label":"Staphylococcus epidermidis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema carpocapsae","label":"Steinernema carpocapsae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"https://wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"steinernema hermaphroditum","label":"Steinernema hermaphroditum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"stenotrophomonas geniculata","label":"Stenotrophomonas geniculata","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus gordonii ","label":"Streptococcus gordonii ","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"streptococcus mutans","label":"Streptococcus mutans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":" streptococcus pneumoniae","label":"Streptococcus pneumoniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"s. purpuratus","label":"Strongylocentrotus purpuratus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"Echinobase","modLink":"https://www.echinobase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"strongyloides ratti","label":"Strongyloides ratti","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"sulfolobus","label":"Sulfolobus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"symphoricarpos albus","label":"Symphoricarpos albus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syncirsodes","label":"Syncirsodes","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"synechococcus elongatus","label":"Synechococcus elongatus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"syrphidae","label":"Syrphidae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","label":"Tarantobelus jeffdanielsi","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"taraxacum officinale","label":"Taraxacum officinale","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tatochila theodice","label":"Tatochila theodice","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetrahymena","label":"Tetrahymena","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tetramorium immigrans","label":"Tetramorium immigrans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tomato brown rugose fruit virus","label":"ToBRFV","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trachemys scripta","label":"Trachemys scripta","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tribolium castaneum","label":"Tribolium castaneum","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichoptera","label":"Trichoptera","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trichuris muris","label":"Trichuris muris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"WormBase","modLink":"www.wormbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trifolium repens","label":"Trifolium repens","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"trypoxylus dichotomus","label":"Trypoxylus dichotomus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"tsuga canadensis","label":"Tsuga canadensis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"ulva expansa","label":"Ulva expansa","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"universal","label":"Universal","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":null,"modLink":null,"linkVariable":null},{"value":"vargula hilgendorfii","label":"Vargula hilgendorfii","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"vespula vulgaris","label":"Vespula vulgaris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"virus","label":"Virus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"watasenia scintillans","label":"Watasenia scintillans","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"wolbachia pipientis","label":"Wolbachia pipientis","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenopus","label":"Xenopus","imageSrc":"xenopus.png","imageAlt":"Xenopus graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"XenBase","modLink":"https://xenbase.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"xenorhabdus griffiniae","label":"Xenorhabdus griffiniae","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"yramea cytheris","label":"Yramea cytheris","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zaprionus indianus","label":"Zaprionus indianus","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"","modLink":"","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zea mays","label":"Zea mays","imageSrc":"","imageAlt":"","mod":"MaizeGDB","modLink":"https://www.maizegdb.org","linkVariable":""},{"value":"zebrafish","label":"Zebrafish","imageSrc":"zebrafish.png","imageAlt":"Zebrafish graphic by Zoe Zorn CC BY 4.0","mod":"ZFIN","modLink":"https://zfin.org","linkVariable":""}]}},"pageContext":{"id":"cc43d669-c58a-434f-9958-cfc7ec8d9957","citedBy":[],"parsedCsv":{"csvHeader":[],"csvData":[]}}}, "staticQueryHashes": ["2114697108"]}